The Role of Purchase Quantity in Assortment Choice: The Quantity-Matching Heuristic

Consumers often purchase multiple items from a product category on a single shopping trip. In doing so, they must frequently choose among items that are grouped in assortments, such as those offered by a particular store or brand. This article examines how the number of to-be-purchased items influences consumer choice among assortments. It is argued that when consumers are uncertain about their preferences, they are more likely to prefer an assortment for which the number of available options matches the desired purchase quantity. This prediction is based on the notion that a match between the size of an assortment and the number of to-be-purchased items enables consumers to simplify the selection process by eliminating the need to trade off the benefits and costs of individual choice alternatives—a strategy referred to as the “quantity-matching heuristic.” The theoretical predictions are supported by data from five empirical studies that offer converging evidence for the role of purchase-quantity goals in assortment choice and identify moderating factors and boundary conditions.

[1]  Bari A. Harlam,et al.  Modeling Consumers’ Choices of Multiple Items , 1995 .

[2]  S. Siddarth,et al.  Modelling the effect of purchase quantity on consumer choice of product assortment , 1998 .

[3]  M. Lepper,et al.  The Construction of Preference: When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing? , 2006 .

[4]  J. Lattin A Model of Balanced Choice Behavior , 1987 .

[5]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Constructive Consumer Choice Processes , 1998 .

[6]  A. Chernev Decision Focus and Consumer Choice Among Assortments , 2006 .

[7]  Itamar Simonson Original ArticlesThe effect of product assortment on buyer preferences4 , 1999 .

[8]  I. Simonson,et al.  The effect of product assortment on buyer preferences 4 4 The paper has benefited from the comments , 1999 .

[9]  Pierre Chandon,et al.  When Are Stockpiled Products Consumed Faster? A Convenience–Salience Framework of Postpurchase Consumption Incidence and Quantity , 2002 .

[10]  Alexander Chernev,et al.  Articulation Compatibility in Eliciting Price Bids , 2006 .

[11]  David J. Reibstein,et al.  Number of choices and perceived decision freedom as a determinant of satisfaction and consumer behavior. , 1975 .

[12]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Diversification bias: Explaining the discrepancy in variety seeking between combined and separated choices , 1995 .

[13]  John T. Gourville,et al.  Overchoice and Assortment Type: When and Why Variety Backfires , 2005 .

[14]  I. Simonson,et al.  The Influence of Purchase Quantity and Display Format on Consumer Preference for Variety , 1992 .

[15]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Accountability and complexity of thought. , 1983 .

[16]  Leigh McAlister,et al.  Choosing Multiple Items From A Product Class , 1978 .

[17]  Lyle Brenner,et al.  On Decisions That Lead to Decisions: Direct and Derived Evaluations of Preference , 2004 .

[18]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion , 1992 .

[19]  J. Walsh Flexibility in Consumer Purchasing for Uncertain Future Tastes , 1995 .

[20]  I. Simonson The Effect of Purchase Quantity and Timing on Variety-Seeking Behavior , 1990 .

[21]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  Reason-based choice , 1993, Cognition.

[22]  Sunil Gupta Impact of Sales Promotions on when, what, and how Much to Buy , 1988 .

[23]  B. Kahn,et al.  Modeling choice among assortments. , 1991 .

[24]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Accounting for the effects of accountability. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  D. Ariely,et al.  Sequential Choice in Group Settings: Taking the Road Less Traveled and Less Enjoyed , 2000 .

[26]  Rebecca K. Ratner,et al.  Choosing less-preferred experiences for the sake of variety. , 1999 .

[27]  Simona Botti,et al.  The psychological pleasure and pain of choosing: when people prefer choosing at the cost of subsequent outcome satisfaction. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  B. Kahn,et al.  The Influence of Assortment Structure on Perceived Variety and Consumption Quantities , 2004 .

[29]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Verbal reports as data. , 1980 .

[30]  David M. Kreps A REPRESENTATION THEOREM FOR "PREFERENCE FOR FLEXIBILITY" , 1979 .

[31]  Alexander Chernev,et al.  Feature Complementarity and Assortment in Choice , 2005 .

[32]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  The Variety of an Assortment , 1999 .

[33]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  An Anchoring and Adjustment Model of Purchase Quantity Decisions , 1998 .

[34]  Amitav Chakravarti,et al.  The Influence of Macro-Level Motives on Consideration Set Composition in Novel Purchase Situations , 2003 .

[35]  A. Tversky,et al.  Contingent weighting in judgment and choice , 1988 .

[36]  A. Chernev Product Assortment and Individual Decision Processes , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  Peter L. Wright,et al.  Analyzing Media Effects on Advertising Responses , 1974 .

[38]  I. Simonson,et al.  The Effect of Purchase Quantity and Timing on Variety-Seeking Behavior , 1990 .

[39]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[40]  B. Schwartz,et al.  Maximizing Versus Satisficing : Happiness Is a Matter of Choice , 2002 .

[41]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion , 1992 .

[42]  Lyle Brenner,et al.  Comparison, Grouping, and Preference , 1999 .