High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer: A North American Clinical Trial

Purpose We determined the safety and efficacy of whole gland high intensity focused ultrasound in men with radiorecurrent prostate cancer. Materials and Methods A total of 100 men with clinically localized recurrent prostate cancer at least 2 years after external beam radiation therapy underwent whole gland high intensity focused ultrasound in an open label trial from 2009 to 2012. Treatments were performed at 16 sites, including 14 in the United States and 2 in Canada. The primary end point was the combination of a prostate specific antigen nadir of 0.5 ng/ml or less and negative biopsy at 12 months. Validated questionnaires were administered to monitor changes in urinary and sexual function. Results Of the 100 treated men, in whom mean age was 70 years (range 53 to 83), 78 completed the 12‐month biopsy, which was negative in 63 (81%). Mean prostate specific antigen was 4.9 ng/ml (range 0.4 to 14) and the median Gleason score was 7. The 1‐year end point of a prostate specific antigen nadir of 0.5 ng/ml or less plus negative biopsy was achieved in 50 men. During post‐trial followup mean prostate specific antigen at 2 years was 1.1 ng/ml (range 0.1 to 17) in 33 patients. Adverse events developed in 91 men through 12 months, which were CTCAE grade 1 in 67, grade 2 in 80 and grade 3 in 20. Treatment related grade 3 adverse events included rectal fistulas in 5 men, which required surgery in 3, osteitis pubis in 3 and hematuria requiring intervention in 3. Treatment related grade 3 adverse events developed early in the trial and appeared related to operator experience. There were no life threatening adverse events or treatment related deaths. Conclusions Whole gland high intensity focused ultrasound appears reasonably safe and effective to treat radiorecurrent prostate cancer. The rate of complications, which are potentially severe, was acceptable, especially considering the advanced, refractory nature of the disease and the limited treatment options.

[1]  Liang Cheng,et al.  Phase I/II trial of high intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of previously untreated localized prostate cancer. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[2]  H. Eggesbø,et al.  Detection of radiorecurrent prostate cancer using diffusion-weighted imaging and targeted biopsies. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  D. Margolis,et al.  Value of Tracking Biopsy in Men Undergoing Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer , 2018, The Journal of urology.

[4]  H. Ahmed,et al.  Focal salvage high‐intensity focused ultrasound in radiorecurrent prostate cancer , 2017, BJU international.

[5]  J. Chin,et al.  Salvage HIFU for recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy , 2009, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[6]  S. Crouzet,et al.  Salvage high‐intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for locally recurrent prostate cancer after failed radiation therapy: Multi‐institutional analysis of 418 patients , 2017, BJU international.

[7]  J. Battermann,et al.  Patterns of outcome and toxicity after salvage prostatectomy, salvage cryosurgery and salvage brachytherapy for prostate cancer recurrences after radiation therapy: a multi-center experience and literature review , 2013, World Journal of Urology.

[8]  T. Uchida,et al.  High‐intensity focused ultrasound as salvage therapy for patients with recurrent prostate cancer after external beam radiation, brachytherapy or proton therapy , 2011, BJU international.

[9]  H. Ahmed,et al.  Focal salvage therapy for localized prostate cancer recurrence after external beam radiotherapy , 2012, Cancer.

[10]  J. Chin,et al.  Pathological, Oncologic and Functional Outcomes of a Prospective Registry of Salvage High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation for Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer , 2017, The Journal of urology.

[11]  C. Chaussy,et al.  Evolution and outcomes of 3 MHz high intensity focused ultrasound therapy for localized prostate cancer during 15 years. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[12]  P. O’Reilly,et al.  VISUALLY DIRECTED HIGH‐INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND FOR ORGAN‐CONFINED PROSTATE CANCER: A PROPOSED STANDARD FOR THE CONDUCT OF THERAPY , 2007, BJU international.

[13]  Shyam Natarajan,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Underestimation of Prostate Cancer Geometry: Use of Patient Specific Molds to Correlate Images with Whole Mount Pathology , 2017, The Journal of urology.

[14]  J. Chin,et al.  Whole‐gland salvage high‐intensity focused ultrasound therapy for localized prostate cancer recurrence after external beam radiation therapy , 2012, Cancer.

[15]  Geoffrey A. Sonn,et al.  Initial experience with electronic tracking of specific tumor sites in men undergoing active surveillance of prostate cancer. , 2014, Urologic oncology.

[16]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Clinical application of a 3D ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy system. , 2011, Urologic oncology.

[17]  S. Crouzet,et al.  Hemi salvage high‐intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in unilateral radiorecurrent prostate cancer: a prospective two‐centre study , 2014, BJU international.

[18]  A. Rosenkrantz,et al.  Imaging and evaluation of patients with high-risk prostate cancer , 2015, Nature Reviews Urology.

[19]  U. Lindner,et al.  An update on focal therapy for prostate cancer , 2016, Nature Reviews Urology.

[20]  L. Curiel,et al.  Local recurrence of prostate cancer after external beam radiotherapy: early experience of salvage therapy using high-intensity focused ultrasonography. , 2004, Urology.

[21]  P. Carroll,et al.  Treatment failure after primary and salvage therapy for prostate cancer , 2008, Cancer.