Ground arthropod community structure in a heterogeneous urban environment

Despite being conspicuous and influential features of the biosphere, urban ecosystems have been neglected in ecological research. Arthropods are abundant in urban settings, but little is known about how these animals respond to urbanization. We systematically monitored the structure of ground arthropod communities for 12 months at 16 sites representing the four most abundant forms of urban land use (residential, industrial, agricultural, and desert remnant) in a rapidly growing metropolitan area (Phoenix, AZ). Although taxonomic richness was comparable among land-use types, community composition differed, with certain taxa being uniquely associated with each form of land use. Three taxa (springtails, ants, and mites) were extremely widespread and abundant, accounting for over 92% of captures; when these three taxa were excluded from analysis, however, differences were revealed in arthropod community composition with urban land use. Trophic dynamics also varied with land use: predators, herbivores, and detritivores were most abundant in agricultural sites, while omnivores were equally abundant in all forms of land use. These community-level differences resulted from taxon-specific responses to habitat structure, which varied with land use. Because arthropod community structure is affected by habitat structure and land use, and because arthropods play key roles in nutrient cycling, organic matter decomposition, pollination, and soil aeration, the spatial heterogeneity of urban ecosystems therefore may affect ecosystem functioning.

[1]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Ecological Census Techniques: Contents , 1996 .

[2]  T. Tscharntke,et al.  Habitat Fragmentation, Species Loss, and Biological Control , 1994, Science.

[3]  Robert B. Blair,et al.  Butterfly diversity and human land use: Species assemblages along an urban gradient , 1997 .

[4]  R. Blair.  Land Use and Avian Species Diversity Along an Urban Gradient , 1996 .

[5]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  A Theory of Gradient Analysis , 2004 .

[6]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[7]  M. Parlange.  THE CITY AS ECOSYSTEM , 1998 .

[8]  W. Czechowski,et al.  Occurrence of carabids (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in the urban greenery of Warsaw according to the land utilization and cultivation , 1982 .

[9]  W. Czechowski,et al.  Methods for the study of urban fauna , 1981 .

[10]  I. Gauld,et al.  Hymenoptera and biodiversity. , 1993 .

[11]  M. Zapparoli.  Urban development and insect biodiversity of the Rome area, Italy , 1997 .

[12]  S. Rottenborn.  Predicting the impacts of urbanization on riparian bird communities , 1999 .

[13]  Nancy E. McIntyre,et al.  Ecology of Urban Arthropods: A Review and a Call to Action , 2000 .

[14]  C. Braak.  Canonical Correspondence Analysis: A New Eigenvector Technique for Multivariate Direct Gradient Analysis , 1986 .

[15]  森下.  Measuring of interspecific association and similarity between communities. , 1961 .

[16]  Gene E. Likens,et al.  Humans as components of ecosystems : the ecology of subtle human effects and populated areas , 1993 .

[17]  P. Kevan.  POLLINATION: KEYSTONE PROCESS IN SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL PRODUCTIVITY , 1991 .

[18]  H. Wolda,et al.  DIVERSITY OF INSECT FAUNAS , 1977 .

[19]  Franz Rebele.  Urban Ecology and Special Features of Urban Ecosystems , 1994 .

[20]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1983 .

[21]  S. Dreistadt,et al.  Urban Forests and Insect EcologyComplex interactions among trees, insects, and people , 1990 .

[22]  L. Ehler,et al.  ECOLOGY OF INSECTS IN URBAN ENVIRONMENTS , 1978 .

[23]  D. Murphy.  Conservation and Confusion: Wrong Species, Wrong Scale, Wrong Conclusions , 1989 .

[24]  G. Lefebvre,et al.  Variations in bird abundance in tropical arid and semi‐arid habitats , 1993 .

[25]  T. Derting,et al.  Ecology: A Bridge between Science and Society , 1998 .

[26]  J. Wiens,et al.  The distribution of ant colonies in a semiarid landscape : implications for community and ecosystem processes , 1996 .

[27]  M. Palmer.  PUTTING THINGS IN EVEN BETTER ORDER: THE ADVANTAGES OF CANONICAL CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS' , 1993 .

[28]  H. Siepel,et al.  Mites of different feeding guilds affect decomposition of organic matter , 1994 .

[29]  K. Kloor.  A Surprising Tale of Life in the City , 1999, Science.

[30]  N. Elliott,et al.  Spatial and temporal distribution of ground beetle (Coleoptera : Carabidae) assemblages in riparian strips and adjacent wheat fields , 1999 .

[31]  Bert C. Klein.  Effects of Forest Fragmentation on Dung and Carrion Beetle Communities in Central Amazonia , 1989 .

[32]  J. Sawoniewicz.  Structure of Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) communities in urban green areas of Warsaw , 1986 .

[33]  Steward T. A. Pickett,et al.  Humans as Components of Ecosystems , 1993, Springer New York.

[34]  J. Lawton,et al.  Empirical Evidence that Declining Species Diversity May Alter the Performance of Terrestrial Ecosystems , 1995 .

[35]  Pamela A. Matson,et al.  Special Feature: The Use of Urban Gradients in Ecological Studies , 1990 .

[36]  Hongsuk H. Kim.  Urban heat island , 1992 .

[37]  H. Schmidt,et al.  Insect communities on experimental mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris L.) plots along an urban gradient , 1998, Oecologia.

[38]  P. Kevan.  Pollination and Environmental Conservation , 1975, Environmental Conservation.

[39]  M. Wackernagel,et al.  Perceptual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital: Economics from an ecological footprint perspective , 1997 .

[40]  L. L. D. Bruyn,et al.  Ants as bioindicators of soil function in rural environments , 1999 .

[41]  J. Niemelä,et al.  SAMPLING CARABID ASSEMBLAGES WITH PITFALL TRAPS: THE MADNESS AND THE METHOD , 1994, The Canadian Entomologist.

[42]  W. Rees.  Revisiting carrying capacity: Area-based indicators of sustainability , 1996 .