Photoluminescence in Analysis of Surfaces and Interfaces

Photoluminescence (PL) is the spontaneous emission of light from a material under optical excitation. The excitation energy and intensity are chosen to probe different regions and excitation concentrations in the sample. PL investigations can be used to characterize a variety of material parameters. PL spectroscopy provides electrical (as opposed to mechanical) characterization, and it is a selective and extremely sensitive probe of discrete electronic states. Features of the emission spectrum can be used to identify surface, interface, and impurity levels and to gauge alloy disorder and interface roughness. The intensity of the PL signal provides information on the quality of surfaces and interfaces. Under pulsed excitation, the transient PLintensity yields the lifetime of nonequilibrium interface and bulk states. Variation of the PL intensity under an applied bias can be used to map the electric field at the surface of a sample. In addition, thermally activated processes cause changes in PL intensity with temperature. PL analysis is nondestructive. Indeed, the technique requires very little sample manipulation or environmental control. Because the sample is excited optically, electrical contacts and junctions are unnecessary and high-resistivity materials pose no practical difficulty. In addition, time-resolved PL can be very fast, making it useful for characterizing the most rapid processes in a material. The fundamental limitation of PL analysis is its reliance on radiative events. Materials with poor radiative efficiency, such as low-quality indirect bandgap semiconductors, are difficult to study via ordinary PL. Similarly, identification of impurity and defect states depends on their optical activity. Although PL is a very sensitive probe of radiative levels, one must rely on secondary evidence to study states that couple weakly with light.

[1]  A. Henry,et al.  Photoluminescence characterization of plasma exposed silicon surfaces , 1991 .

[2]  B. Sermage,et al.  Photoluminescence study of the interface in type II InAlAs–InP heterostructures , 1998 .

[3]  K. Uosaki,et al.  Photoluminescence and impedance study of p-gallium arsenide/electrolyte interfaces under cathodic bias: evidence for flat-band potential shift during illumination and introduction of high-density surface states by platinum treatment , 1989 .

[4]  C. Louis,et al.  Application of dynamic photoluminescence spectroscopy to the study of the active surface sites on supported molybdenum/silica catalysts: features of anchored and impregnated catalysts , 1989 .

[5]  Martelli,et al.  Linewidth analysis of the photoluminescence of InxGa1-xAs/GaAs quantum wells (x=0.09, 0.18, 1.0). , 1995, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[6]  J. Merz,et al.  Characterization of recombination processes in multiple narrow asymmetric coupled quantum wells based on the dependence of photoluminescence on laser intensity , 1992 .

[7]  M. Gal,et al.  Observation of interface defects in strained InGaAs‐GaAs by photoluminescence spectroscopy , 1989 .

[8]  B. A. Foreman,et al.  One- and two-photon-excited time-resolved photoluminescence investigations of bulk and surface recombination dynamics in ZnSe , 1998 .

[9]  T. Dittrich,et al.  Express characterization of indirect semiconductor surfaces by in situ photoluminescence during chemical and electrochemical treatments , 1998 .

[10]  T. Yao,et al.  Characterization of alloy formation at the ZnSe/CdSe quantum-well interface by photoluminescence spectroscopy , 1994 .

[11]  Yingchun Zhu,et al.  Electronic State Characterization of TiO2Ultrafine Particles by Luminescence Spectroscopy , 1998 .

[12]  Richard K. Ahrenkiel,et al.  Recombination lifetime of In0.53Ga0.47As as a function of doping density , 1998 .

[13]  N. Lewis,et al.  Chemical studies of the passivation of GaAs surface recombination using sulfides and thiols , 1991 .

[14]  T. H. Gfroerer,et al.  Efficient directional spontaneous emission from an InGaAs/InP heterostructure with an integral parabolic reflector , 1998 .

[15]  Richard K. Ahrenkiel,et al.  Ultralow recombination velocity at Ga0.5In0.5P/GaAs heterointerfaces , 1989 .

[16]  G. Carver Scanned photoluminescence with high spatial resolution in semi-insulating GaAs and InP:aspects of surface passivation and photodegradation , 1992 .

[17]  K. Mettler Photoluminescence as a tool for the study of the electronic surface properties of gallium arsenide , 1977 .

[18]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  High-resolution dry etching of zinc telluride: characterization of etched surfaces by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, photoluminescence and Raman scattering , 1991 .

[19]  Rainer Kassing,et al.  Characterization Of InP Surfaces Using Integral Photoluminescence Measurements , 1989, Other Conferences.

[20]  S. Brueck,et al.  A confocal photoluminescence study of metalorganic chemical vapor deposition growth on patterned GaAs substrates , 1994 .

[21]  Y. Mori,et al.  Photoluminescence study on the interface of a GaAs/AlxGa1-xAs heterostructure grown by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition , 1988 .

[22]  N. Haegel,et al.  Recombination model for heterostructure interfaces , 1993 .

[23]  D. Arent,et al.  Investigation of chemical wet-etch surface modification of Ga0.5In0.5P using photoluminescence , x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, capacitance measurements, and photocurrent-voltage curves , 1995 .

[24]  Photoluminescence and interface abruptness in InGaAsP/InGaAsP quantum wells , 1994 .

[25]  J. Sites,et al.  Photoluminescence dead layer in p‐type InP , 1982 .

[26]  D. Lile,et al.  Surface characterization of InP using photoluminescence , 1987 .

[27]  I. Umebu,et al.  Characterization of radiative efficiency in double heterostructures of InGaAsP/InP by photoluminescence intensity analysis , 1986 .

[28]  M. Thewalt,et al.  Photoluminescence studies of ultrahigh‐purity epitaxial silicon , 1986 .

[29]  A. Forchel,et al.  Direct optical analysis of the carrier diffusion in semiconductor wire structures , 1995 .

[30]  Emil S. Koteles,et al.  Optical Characterization Of Single Quantum Wells Fabricated Under Conditions Of Interrupted Growth , 1987, Other Conferences.

[31]  Toshiyuki Yoshida,et al.  Characterization of Interface Electronic Properties of Low-Temperature Ultrathin Oxides and Oxynitrides Formed on Si(111) Surfaces by Contactless Capacitance-Voltage and Photoluminescence Methods , 1997 .

[32]  M. Tajima Characterization of semiconductors by photoluminescence mapping at room temperature , 1990 .

[33]  T. Kuech,et al.  Detection of ammonia, phosphine, and arsine gases by reversible modulation of cadmium selenide photoluminescence intensity , 1995 .

[34]  B. Deveaud,et al.  Photoluminescence study of interface defects in high‐quality GaAs‐GaAlAs superlattices , 1986 .

[35]  I. Ferguson,et al.  The optical properties of thin Al0.3Ga0.7As-GaAs quantum wells on misorientated substrates with (110) terraces. A study of interface roughness using photoluminescence , 1992 .

[36]  J. G. Mendoza-Alvarez,et al.  Photoluminescence characterization of the surface layer of chemically etched CdTe , 1990 .

[37]  J. Massies,et al.  Photoluminescence energy and interface chemistry of GaInP/GaAs quantum wells , 1997 .

[38]  B. Elsner,et al.  Lp-movpe Growth and Optical Characterization of Galnp/gaas Heterostructures: Interfaces, Quantum Wells and Quantum Wires , 1992 .

[39]  J. Harbison,et al.  Recombination at GaAs surfaces and GaAs/AlGaAs interfaces probed by in situ photoluminescence , 1991 .

[40]  Y. Kawakami,et al.  Fabrication and optical properties of ZnCdSe/ZnSe single quantum wells on GaAs(110) surfaces cleaved in UHV by molecular beam epitaxy , 1996 .

[41]  M. Garrigues,et al.  Study of InP surface treatments by scanning photoluminescence microscopy , 1986 .

[42]  S. Naritsuka,et al.  Spatially resolved photoluminescence of laterally overgrown InP on InP-coated Si substrates , 1997 .