Chirp-modulated visual evoked potential as a generalization of steady state visual evoked potential

Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) are of great concern in cognitive and clinical neuroscience as well as in the recent research field of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). In this study, a chirp-modulated stimulation was employed to serve as a novel type of visual stimulus. Based on our empirical study, the chirp stimuli visual evoked potential (Chirp-VEP) preserved frequency features of the chirp stimulus analogous to the steady state evoked potential (SSVEP), and therefore it can be regarded as a generalization of SSVEP. Specifically, we first investigated the characteristics of the Chirp-VEP in the time-frequency domain and the fractional domain via fractional Fourier transform. We also proposed a group delay technique to derive the apparent latency from Chirp-VEP. Results on EEG data showed that our approach outperformed the traditional SSVEP-based method in efficiency and ease of apparent latency estimation. For the recruited six subjects, the average apparent latencies ranged from 100 to 130 ms. Finally, we implemented a BCI system with six targets to validate the feasibility of Chirp-VEP as a potential candidate in the field of BCIs.

[1]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  An online multi-channel SSVEP-based brain–computer interface using a canonical correlation analysis method , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[2]  V. Namias.  The Fractional Order Fourier Transform and its Application to Quantum Mechanics , 1980 .

[3]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  Design and implementation of a brain-computer interface with high transfer rates , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Levent Onural,et al.  Convolution, filtering, and multiplexing in fractional Fourier domains and their relation to chirp and wavelet transforms , 1994 .

[5]  Ivan Volosyak,et al.  Multiple Channel Detection of Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials for Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  A. Cichocki,et al.  Steady-state visually evoked potentials: Focus on essential paradigms and future perspectives , 2010, Progress in Neurobiology.

[7]  T. J. Sullivan,et al.  A user-friendly SSVEP-based brain–computer interface using a time-domain classifier , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[8]  Björn Johansson,et al.  Fourier analysis of steady-state visual evoked potentials in subjects with normal and defective stereo vision , 2000, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[9]  Hubert Cecotti,et al.  A Self-Paced and Calibration-Less SSVEP-Based Brain–Computer Interface Speller , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  D. Regan.  Some characteristics of average steady-state and transient responses evoked by modulated light. , 1966, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  D. Regan.  Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine , 1989 .

[12]  Peter E. Hart,et al.  Nearest neighbor pattern classification , 1967, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[13]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[14]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  An SSVEP BCI to Control a Hand Orthosis for Persons With Tetraplegia , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[15]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  Enhancing the classification accuracy of steady-state visual evoked potential-based brain–computer interfaces using phase constrained canonical correlation analysis , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[16]  G Calhoun,et al.  Brain-computer interfaces based on the steady-state visual-evoked response. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[17]  G Pfurtscheller,et al.  Toward a hybrid brain–computer interface based on imagined movement and visual attention , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[18]  D. Regan.  Steady-state evoked potentials. , 1977, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[19]  Hans Strasburger,et al.  THE ANALYSIS OF STEADY STATE EVOKED POTENTIALS REVISITED , 1987 .

[20]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention to stimulus location modulates the steady-state visual evoked potential. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Luís B. Almeida,et al.  The fractional Fourier transform and time-frequency representations , 1994, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[22]  A. Keil,et al.  Aberrant brain dynamics in schizophrenia: delayed buildup and prolonged decay of the visual steady-state response. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[23]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  Frequency and Phase Mixed Coding in SSVEP-Based Brain--Computer Interface , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  V Porciatti,et al.  The temporal frequency response function of pattern ERG and VEP: changes in optic neuritis. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[25]  Pradeep J Nathan,et al.  Augmentation of serotonin enhances pleasant and suppresses unpleasant cortical electrophysiological responses to visual emotional stimuli in humans , 2004, NeuroImage.

[26]  J. Radon.  On the determination of functions from their integral values along certain manifolds , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  S. Tobimatsu,et al.  Studies of human visual pathophysiology with visual evoked potentials , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[28]  M. A. Kutay,et al.  Introduction to the Fractional Fourier Transform and Its Applications , 1999 .

[29]  Yu-Te Wang,et al.  A cell-phone-based brain–computer interface for communication in daily life , 2010, AICI.

[30]  Gozde Bozdagi Akar,et al.  Digital computation of the fractional Fourier transform , 1996, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[31]  Erich E. Sutter,et al.  The brain response interface: communication through visually-induced electrical brain responses , 1992 .

[32]  J. Bieger,et al.  Light Stimulation Properties to Influence Brain Activity: A Brain-CoMputer Interface application , 2010 .

[33]  J.J. Vidal,et al.  Real-time detection of brain events in EEG , 1977, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[34]  F. Pasquier,et al.  Atteinte de la voie magnocellulaire dans la maladie d’Alzheimer , 2002 .

[35]  M. de Tommaso,et al.  Discrimination between migraine patients and normal subjects based on steady state visual evoked potentials: discriminant analysis and artificial neural network classifiers. , 1997, Functional neurology.

[36]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for an early attentional mechanism in visual processing in humans , 1999, Vision Research.