Returns to residential energy efficiency and conservation measures: A field experiment

Residential energy conservation is a key component of contemporary energy and climate change policy in the US and elsewhere. Comparisons of the relative effectiveness of measures aimed at reducing residential energy consumption are made challenging, however, by the endogeneity of technology and energy use decisions. In this paper we describe a novel small-scale field experiment that uses randomized treatments to estimate the returns to three types of energy conservation measures in institutionally owned homes. The results from the experiment indicate considerable reductions in natural gas consumption associated with the installation of attic insulation and the provision of incentives for conservation. The results are supported by observations of ambient indoor temperature data, which show that households receiving incentives significantly reduce their temperature settings—especially when coupled with access to a programmable thermostat. The study will ideally provide guidance for institutions and communities considering energy efficiency measures and for future researchers designing randomized experiments to study residential energy use.

[1]  S. Hayes,et al.  Reducing residential electrical energy use: payments, information, and feedback. , 1977, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[2]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms , 2007, Psychological science.

[3]  E. Duflo,et al.  How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates? , 2001 .

[4]  Michael K. Price,et al.  Handbook on Experimental Economics and the Environment , 2013 .

[5]  Matthew E. Kahn,et al.  Why Has California&Apos;S Residential Electricity Consumption Been so Flat Since the 1980s?: A Microeconometric Approach , 2010 .

[6]  D. Greene,et al.  Energy efficiency and consumption — the rebound effect — a survey , 2000 .

[7]  R. Battalio Residential Electricity Demand: An Experimental Study , 1979 .

[8]  R. Winett,et al.  Effects of self-monitoring and feedback on residential electricity consumption. , 1979, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[9]  Matthew J. Kotchen,et al.  Are Building Codes Effective at Saving Energy? Evidence from Residential Billing Data in Florida , 2010, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[10]  Lucas W. Davis Durable goods and residential demand for energy and water: evidence from a field trial , 2008 .

[11]  H. Allcott,et al.  Is There an Energy Efficiency Gap? , 2012 .

[12]  K. Gillingham,et al.  Split Incentives in Residential Energy Consumption , 2012 .

[13]  Ian Ayres,et al.  Evidence from Two Large Field Experiments that Peer Comparison Feedback can Reduce Residential Energy Usage , 2009 .

[14]  Jeffrey A. Dubin,et al.  An Econometric Analysis of Residential Electric Appliance Holdings and Consumption , 1984 .

[15]  H. Allcott,et al.  Social Norms and Energy Conservation , 2011 .

[16]  Allen K. Miedema,et al.  Price Effects of Energy-Efficient Technologies: A Study of Residential Demand for Heating and Cooling , 1986 .

[17]  A. Levinson,et al.  Energy Use By Apartment Tenants When Landlords Pay For Utilities , 2004 .

[18]  R. Sutherland Market Barriers to Energy-Efficiency Investments , 1991 .

[19]  Gilbert E. Metcalf,et al.  Measuring the Energy Savings from Home Improvement Investments: Evidence from Monthly Billing Data , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[20]  Christian A. Vossler,et al.  Analyzing repeated-game economics experiments: robust standard errors for panel data with serial correlation , 2009 .

[21]  Matthew E. Kahn,et al.  Energy Conservation "Nudges" and Environmentalist Ideology: Evidence from a Randomized Residential Electricity Field Experiment , 2010 .

[22]  P. Linares,et al.  Energy Efficiency: Economics and Policy , 2010 .

[23]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  Normative Social Influence is Underdetected , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[24]  A. Jaffe,et al.  The energy-efficiency gap What does it mean? , 1994 .