Rate-Dependent Changes in Intraventricular Conduction Produced by Procainamide in Anesthetized Dogs: A Quantitative Analysis Based on the Relation Between Phase 0 Inward Current and Conduction Velocity

Antiarrhythmic drug effects on maximal upstroke velocity (Vmax) are frequency dependent, which implies that the effects of these drugs on conduction should also be rate dependent. Previous in vivo studies have been limited by assumptions about unchanging propagation pathway, and by the empirical use of a first-order recovery model. To explore time-dependent antiarrhythmic drug-induced conduction slowing in vivo, we used 56-electrode epicardial mapping in chloralose-anesthetized dogs with formalin-induced atrioventricular block. Intervaldependent changes in conduction time were assessed under control conditions and then after three loading and maintenance infusions of procainamide. Under control conditions, epicardial activation time (86 ± 26 msec at a basic cycle length of 300 msec) was unchanged (87 ± 24 msec) by pauses up to 6.6 ± 2.2 seconds. Procainamide caused conduction slowing that dissipated as a function of recovery interval, with 94 ± 6% recovery over a maximum pause of 6.7 ± 1.5 seconds, but did not alter activation pattern. Drug-induced changes in conduction were evaluated by use of a mathematical model assuming phase 0 inward current proportional to conduction velocity squared. Conduction changes were better fitted by this "quadratic model" (least sum of squared deviations 3.9 ×l0−3 by mapping in five dogs, 2.7 ×l0−3 by use of QRS duration in nine dogs) than by a monoexponential model (sum of squared deviations 5.7×l0−3 by mapping, 3.4×l0−2 with QRS;<0.01 vs. quadratic model for each). As predicted by theoretical analysis, recovery time constants from the quadratic model were similar to time constants for procainamideinduced changes in Vmax In vitro, and significantly longer than values obtained with a monoexponential model. Drug-induced changes in QRS duration were highly correlated with simultaneous changes measured by epicardial mapping (r=0.95, p<0.001), indicating that QRS duration is a valid index of drug effects on ventricular conduction. We concluded that procainamide causes interval-dependent changes in ventricular conduction in vivo that are consistent with a proportional relation between phase 0 inward current and the square of conduction velocity. These observations have important potential implications for the dosedependent and heart rate-dependent effects of antiarrhythmic drugs.

[1]  H A Fozzard,et al.  Nonlinear Relation Between ±max and INa in Canine Cardiac Purkinje Cells , 1988, Circulation research.

[2]  J. Francis Heidlage,et al.  Influence of the Passive Anisotropic Properties on Directional Differences in Propagation Following Modification of the Sodium Conductance in Human Atrial Muscle: A Model of Reentry Based on Anisotropic Discontinuous Propagation , 1988, Circulation research.

[3]  S. Nattel,et al.  Exercise induced conduction slowing by flecainide an arrhythmogenic consequence of modulated receptor mechanisms , 1988 .

[4]  Hondeghem Lm,et al.  Quantitative structure activity studies of antiarrhythmic properties in a series of lidocaine and procainamide derivatives. , 1988, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[5]  W. Cascio,et al.  Enhancement of procainamide-induced rate-dependent conduction slowing by elevated myocardial extracellular potassium concentration in vivo. , 1987, Circulation.

[6]  D. Roden,et al.  Frequency- and orientation-dependent effects of mexiletine and quinidine on conduction in the intact dog heart. , 1987, Circulation.

[7]  J. Anderson,et al.  Occurrence of exercise-induced and spontaneous wide complex tachycardia during therapy with flecainide for complex ventricular arrhythmias: a probable proarrhythmic effect. , 1987, American heart journal.

[8]  S. Nattel Interval-dependent effects of lidocaine on conduction in canine cardiac Purkinje fibers: experimental observations and theoretical analysis. , 1987, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[9]  S. Nattel Relationship between use-dependent effects of antiarrhythmic drugs on conduction and Vmax in canine cardiac Purkinje fibers. , 1987, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[10]  L. Hondeghem,et al.  Antiarrhythmic agents: modulated receptor applications. , 1987, Circulation.

[11]  M S Spach,et al.  Propagating depolarization in anisotropic human and canine cardiac muscle: apparent directional differences in membrane capacitance. A simplified model for selective directional effects of modifying the sodium conductance on Vmax, tau foot, and the propagation safety factor. , 1987, Circulation research.

[12]  S. Nattel,et al.  Frequency-dependent effects of calcium antagonists on atrioventricular conduction and refractoriness: demonstration and characterization in anesthetized dogs. , 1986, Circulation.

[13]  J. Spear,et al.  The effects of procainamide on conduction in anisotropic canine ventricular myocardium. , 1986, Circulation.

[14]  B. Katzung,et al.  Use-dependent effects of lidocaine on conduction in canine myocardium: application of the modulated receptor hypothesis in vivo. , 1986, Circulation.

[15]  S. Nattel Frequency-dependent effects of amitriptyline on ventricular conduction and cardiac rhythm in dogs. , 1985, Circulation.

[16]  K. Ellenbogen,et al.  Frequency-dependent effects of verapamil on atrioventricular nodal conduction in man. , 1985, Circulation.

[17]  F. Morady,et al.  Rate-dependent effects of intravenous lidocaine, procainamide and amiodarone on intraventricular conduction. , 1985, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  E. Gang,et al.  Rate-dependent effects of procainamide on His-Purkinje conduction in man. , 1985, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  B. Surawicz,et al.  Frequency-Dependent Effects of Several Class I Antiarrhythmic Drugs on &OV0312;max of Action Potential Upstroke in Canine Cardiac Purkinje Fibers , 1985, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology.

[20]  J E Saffitz,et al.  Intramural Reentry as a Mechanism of Ventricular Tachycardia during Evolving Canine Myocardial Infarction , 1985, Circulation research.

[21]  J. Hume,et al.  Interactions of organic calcium channel antagonists with calcium channels in single frog atrial cells , 1985, The Journal of general physiology.

[22]  J W Buchanan,et al.  The Effects of Antiarrhythmic Drugs, Stimulation Frequency, and Potassium‐Induced Resting Membrane: Potential Changes on Conduction Velocity and dV/dtmax in Guinea Pig Myocardium , 1985, Circulation research.

[23]  C. Starmer,et al.  Antiarrhythmic drug action. Blockade of the inward sodium current. , 1984, Circulation research.

[24]  C F Starmer,et al.  Mechanisms of use-dependent block of sodium channels in excitable membranes by local anesthetics. , 1984, Biophysical journal.

[25]  R. Tsien,et al.  Maximal Upstroke Velocity as an Index of Available Sodium Conductance: Comparison of Maximal Upstroke Velocity and Voltage Clamp Measurements of Sodium Current in Rabbit Purkinje Fibers , 1984, Circulation research.

[26]  S. Nattel,et al.  Frequency-dependent effects of antiarrhythmic drugs on action potential duration and refractoriness of canine cardiac Purkinje fibers. , 1984, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[27]  H A Fozzard,et al.  The conducted action potential. Models and comparison to experiments. , 1983, Biophysical journal.

[28]  M R Franz,et al.  Long-term recording of monophasic action potentials from human endocardium. , 1983, The American journal of cardiology.

[29]  Y. Tsuda,et al.  Voltage- and use-dependent effects of lidocaine on sodium current in rat single ventricular cells. , 1983, Circulation research.

[30]  K. Courtney Interval-dependent effects of small antiarrhythmic drugs on excitability of guinea-pig myocardium. , 1980, Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology.

[31]  L. Horowitz,et al.  Large dose procainamide therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmia. , 1980, The American journal of cardiology.

[32]  B. Katzung,et al.  Time- and voltage-dependent interactions of antiarrhythmic drugs with cardiac sodium channels. , 1977, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[33]  J. Bigger,et al.  The Effect of Procaine Amide on Components of Excitability in Long Mammalian Cardiac Purkinje Fibers , 1976, Circulation research.

[34]  B. Katzung,et al.  Effect of Lidocaine and Quinidine on Steady‐State: Characteristics and Recovery Kinetics of (dV/dt)max in Guinea Pig Ventricular Myocardium , 1975, Circulation research.

[35]  M. Rosen,et al.  Effects of procaine amide on the electrophysiologic properties of the canine ventricular conducting system. , 1973, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[36]  J. Bigger,et al.  Intermittent intravenous procaine amide to treat ventricular arrhythmias. Correlation of plasma concentration with effect on arrhythmia, electrocardiogram, and blood pressure. , 1973, Annals of internal medicine.

[37]  D. Durrer,et al.  Spread of activation in the left ventricular wall of the dog. II. Activation conditions at the epicardial surface. , 1954, American heart journal.

[38]  D. A. Bell,et al.  Applied Statistics , 1953, Nature.

[39]  M. Josephson,et al.  Predicting ventricular tachycardia cycle length after procainamide by assessing cycle length-dependent changes in paced QRS duration. , 1989, Circulation.

[40]  B. Katzung,et al.  Antiarrhythmic agents: the modulated receptor mechanism of action of sodium and calcium channel-blocking drugs. , 1984, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[41]  P J Hunter,et al.  Analytical models of propagation in excitable cells. , 1975, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.