The role of intermodulation distortion in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions

Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) are low-intensity sounds recorded in the external ear canal immediately following stimulation by a transient stimulus, typically a click. While the details of their production is unknown, there is evidence to suggest that the amplitude of each component frequency reflects the physiological condition of the corresponding region of the cochlea. Certain observations are at variance with this assumption, however, suggesting that pathology at a basal site within the cochlea might affect the production of emissions at frequencies which are not characteristic for that site. We have recorded click-evoked emissions in guinea pigs using high-pass clicks and found emissions at frequencies which are not present in the stimulus and which could not, therefore, have originated from the characteristic place for those emission frequencies. These new frequencies are, by definition, intermodulation distortion frequencies and must have been generated from combinations of frequencies in the stimulus by non-linear processes within the cochlea. Further processing of the emissions by Kemp's technique of non-linear recovery showed that the magnitude of emissions at frequencies within the stimulus frequency pass-band was approximately the same as that of frequencies not present in the stimulus. We propose that, in guinea pigs at least, most of the click-evoked emission energy is generated as intermodulation distortion, produced by non-linear intermodulation between various frequency components of the stimulus. If this result is confirmed in humans, many of the anomalies in the literature may be resolved.

[1]  E. M. Burns,et al.  Incidence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in children and infants. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  E. Zwicker,et al.  Acoustical responses and suppression-period patterns in guinea pigs , 1981, Hearing Research.

[3]  David T. Kemp,et al.  Ear canal acoustic and round window electrical correlates of 2f 1- f 2 distortion generated in the cochlea , 1984, Hearing Research.

[4]  Joe C. Adams,et al.  Stimulated acoustic emissions in the ear canal of the gerbil , 1981, Hearing Research.

[5]  G. Zweig,et al.  Noninvasive measurement of the cochlear traveling-wave ratio. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  P. Avan,et al.  Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and high-frequency acoustic trauma in the guinea pig. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Basilar membrane mechanics in the hook region of cat and guinea-pig cochleae: Sharp tuning and nonlinearity in the absence of baseline position shifts , 1992, Hearing Research.

[8]  A. M. Brown,et al.  Suppression of human acoustic distortion product: dual origin of 2f1-f2. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  P. Avan,et al.  Temporal patterns of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired cochleae , 1993, Hearing Research.

[10]  Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler,et al.  Suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) near 2f1−f2 removes DP-gram fine structure—Evidence for a secondary generator , 1998 .

[11]  L. Robles,et al.  Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input-output functions, tuning curves, and response phases. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Xu Li,et al.  Peripheral analysis of frequency in human ears revealed by tone burst evoked otoacoustic emissions , 1994, Hearing Research.

[13]  E. ELLIOTT,et al.  A Ripple Effect in the Audiogram , 1958, Nature.

[14]  W. S. Rhode Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer technique. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  G. Zweig,et al.  The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  P M Zurek Acoustic emissions from the ear: a summary of results from humans and animals. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  S. Neely,et al.  Click- and tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  P. E. Stopp Frequency analysis and periodicity detection in hearing 1971, Plomp and Smoorenburg (Editors). Leiden, Netherlands: Sijthoff Leiden. Cloth, Fl. 60 , 1971 .

[19]  D. T. Kemp,et al.  Otoacoustic emissions, travelling waves and cochlear mechanisms , 1986, Hearing Research.

[20]  The effect of furosemide on evoked otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs , 1992, Hearing Research.

[21]  D O Kim,et al.  Cochlear mechanics: nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  D. T. Kemp,et al.  Properties of the generator of stimulated acoustic emissions , 1980, Hearing Research.

[23]  G K Yates,et al.  Otoacoustic emissions measured with a physically open recording system. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  S J Norton,et al.  Tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  A. M. Brown,et al.  Two sources of acoustic distortion products from the human cochlea. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  G. K. Martin,et al.  Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. II. Sites of origin revealed by suppression contours and pure-tone exposures , 1987, Hearing Research.

[27]  A. M. Brown,et al.  Measurement of acoustic distortion reveals underlying similarities between human and rodent mechanical responses. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  G. Tavartkiladze,et al.  Transient evoked otoacoustic emission with unexpectedly short latency. , 1997, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[29]  M. Souter Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions from guinea pig and human subjects , 1995, Hearing Research.

[30]  M. Spies,et al.  Elastic wave propagation in transversely isotropic media. II. The generalized Rayleigh function and an integral representation for the transducer field. Theory , 1995 .

[31]  P. Avan,et al.  Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and the influence of high-frequency hearing losses in humans. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Hendrikus Duifhuis,et al.  Biophysics of Hair Cell Sensory Systems , 1993 .

[33]  P Bray,et al.  An advanced cochlear echo technique suitable for infant screening. , 1987, British journal of audiology.

[34]  B. Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. I. Basic features and physiological vulnerability , 1987, Hearing Research.

[35]  R. J. Ritsma,et al.  Evoked acoustical responses from the human ear: Some experimental results , 1980, Hearing Research.

[36]  G K Yates,et al.  Enhancement of the transient-evoked otoacoustic emission produced by the addition of a pure tone in the guinea pig. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  D T Kemp,et al.  A Guide to the Effective Use of Otoacoustic Emissions , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[39]  D. Kemp Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  Hans Werner Strube,et al.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions as cochlear Bragg reflections , 1989, Hearing Research.