From Intervention to Co-constitution: New Directions in Theorizing about Aging and Technology

We propose directions for future research on aging and technology to address fundamental changes in the experience of later life that come with the "digitization" of societies. Our argument is contextualized by the massive investments of policy makers and companies in gerontechnologies and their failure to create scale and impact. Partly this failure is due to an interventionist logic that positions new technologies as interventions or solutions to the problems of aging. What has been overlooked - at least theoretically - is how aging is already co-constituted by gerontechnology design, the socio-material practices it enacts, and the policy discourse around them. Goals are (a) reviewing elements of the current aging and technology agenda, (b) demonstrating how the interventionist logic has hampered theory development (and practical impact), (c) pulling together key insights from the emerging body of empirical literature at the intersection of social gerontology and Science and Technology Studies (STS), with the objective of (d) providing directions for future research on aging and technology. Our argument presents the theoretical gains that can be made by combining insights from STS and social gerontology to research the co-constitution of aging and technology.

[1]  Alexander Peine,et al.  The rise of the “innosumer”—Rethinking older technology users , 2014 .

[2]  S. Katz,et al.  How Old am I? , 2016 .

[3]  Sandra C Buttigieg,et al.  Inclusion of Older Adults in the Research and Design of Digital Technology , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[4]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches , 2004 .

[5]  S. Czaja,et al.  Advancing the Aging and Technology Agenda in Gerontology. , 2015, The Gerontologist.

[6]  Louis Neven,et al.  By any means? Questioning the link between gerontechnological innovation and older people's wish to live at home , 2015 .

[7]  T. Pinch,et al.  Living in a Material World: Economic Sociology Meets Science and Technology Studies , 2008 .

[8]  Meika Loe,et al.  A sociological approach to ageing, technology and health. , 2010, Sociology of health & illness.

[9]  Andrew Sixsmith,et al.  Technology and the Challenge of Aging , 2013 .

[10]  W Ben Mortenson,et al.  The power(s) of observation: theoretical perspectives on surveillance technologies and older people , 2013, Ageing and Society.

[11]  Roser Beneito-Montagut,et al.  What do we know about the relationship between Internet mediated interaction and social isolation and loneliness in later life , 2018 .

[12]  Jeannette Pols,et al.  Where is grandma? Home telecare, good aging and the domestication of later life , 2015 .

[13]  Mireia Fernández-Ardèvol,et al.  Beyond WhatsApp: Older people and smartphones , 2016 .

[14]  Jonathan Hughes,et al.  Reflecting on User-Involvement and Participatory Research , 2010 .

[15]  S. Sismondo.  An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies , 2003 .

[16]  Neil Charness,et al.  Aging and Human Performance , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[17]  Meika Loe.  Comfort and medical ambivalence in old age , 2015 .

[18]  Louis Neven,et al.  'But obviously not for me': robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test users. , 2010, Sociology of health & illness.

[19]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Aging and ergonomics : the challenges of individual differences and environmental change , 1996 .

[20]  H. Verloo,et al.  Perceptions About Technologies That Help Community-Dwelling Older Adults Remain at Home: Qualitative Study. , 2020, Journal of medical Internet research.

[21]  Julie Bønnelycke,et al.  Innovating for ‘active ageing’ in a public–private innovation partnership: Creating doable problems and alignment , 2015 .

[22]  A. Peine.  The Co-Constitution of Health Systems and Innovation , 2019, International journal of health policy and management.

[23]  Alexander Peine,et al.  Social-structural lag revisited , 2011 .

[24]  A. Peine,et al.  From Triple Win to Triple Sin: How a Problematic Future Discourse is Shaping the Way People Age with Technology , 2017 .

[25]  Sil Aarts,et al.  Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place , 2015, Gerontology.

[26]  Jeannette Pols,et al.  Good relations with technology: Empirical ethics and aesthetics in care. , 2017, Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals.

[27]  Jeannette Pols,et al.  Ethical implications of home telecare for older people: a framework derived from a multisited participative study , 2015, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[28]  Tiago Moreira.  Science, Technology and the Ageing Society , 2016 .

[29]  B. Latour.  We Have Never Been Modern , 1991 .

[30]  Daniel Lopez Gomez.  Little arrangements that matter. Rethinking autonomy-enabling innovations for later life , 2015 .

[31]  Gabriel Abend.  Living in a Material World: Economic Sociology Meets Science and Technology Studies , 2010 .

[32]  Elisa Giaccardi,et al.  Design for Resourceful Ageing : Intervening in the Ethics of Gerontechnology , 2016 .

[33]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  The Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement(CREATE): A program to enhance technology for older adults , 2001 .

[34]  Stephen J. Cutler,et al.  Technological Change and Aging , 2006 .

[35]  Alexander Peine,et al.  Rejuvenating Design , 2017 .

[36]  Britt Östlund,et al.  Turning older people’s experiences into innovations: Ippi as the convergence of mobile services and TV viewing , 2011 .

[37]  Neil Charness,et al.  TRAINING OLDER AND YOUNGER ADULTS TO USE SOFTWARE , 1989 .

[38]  A. Wanka.  Continuity and change in the transition to retirement: how time allocation, leisure practices and lifestyles evolve when work vanishes in later life , 2019, European Journal of Ageing.

[39]  Alexander Peine,et al.  Science, technology and the ‘grand challenge’ of ageing—Understanding the socio-material constitution of later life , 2015 .

[40]  Sun Young Park,et al.  Technological and Organizational Adaptation of EMR Implementation in an Emergency Department , 2015, TCHI.

[41]  V. P. Franklin,et al.  Introduction , 2018, The Journal of African American History.

[42]  Tiago Moreira,et al.  Unmaking old age: political and cognitive formats of active ageing. , 2014, Journal of aging studies.

[43]  C. N. Scanaill,et al.  Older adults, falls and technologies for independent living: a life space approach , 2011, Ageing and Society.

[44]  Neil Charness,et al.  Twenty Six – Human Factors and Design for Older Adults , 1990 .

[45]  Hans-Werner Wahl,et al.  Age and cohort effects in gerontechnology: A reconsideration , 2012 .

[46]  Alexander Peine,et al.  Valuing health technology – habilitating and prosthetic strategies in personal health systems , 2015 .

[47]  A. Seifert,et al.  Use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Devices Among the Oldest-Old: Loneliness, Anomie, and Autonomy , 2020, Innovation in aging.

[48]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare. , 2013, Social science & medicine.

[49]  E. Hutchins.  Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[50]  M. Mort,et al.  Telecare and older people: who cares where? , 2011, Social science & medicine.

[51]  M. C. Clark,et al.  Older Adults and Daily Living Task Profiles , 1990, Human factors.

[52]  Clara Berridge,et al.  Breathing Room in Monitored Space: The Impact of Passive Monitoring Technology on Privacy in Independent Living. , 2016, The Gerontologist.

[53]  Meika Loe,et al.  Doing it my way: old women, technology and wellbeing. , 2010, Sociology of health & illness.

[54]  J. Birren,et al.  Aging and technological advances , 1985 .

[55]  Katie Brittain,et al.  An Age-Old Problem: Examining the Discourses of Ageing in HCI and Strategies for Future Research , 2015, TCHI.