Hearing aid measurements with speech and noise signals.

An increasing number of hearing aid types include one or more features which are intentionally non-linear. In such devices measurement of frequency response and distortion using sweep tone measurements are typically of little relevance. Five different non-linear hearing aid types were used to evaluate three different broad-band measuring methods. The results revealed that these methods were meaningful in estimating average frequency response obtained with a specific input signal, but none of the three methods used in the study was able to evaluate separately the effects of the most important signal modifications: memoryless non-linearity like peak clipping, time-varying gain from AGC and additive internal noise.

[1]  C Ludvigsen,et al.  Evaluation of a noise reduction method--comparison between observed scores and scores predicted from STI. , 1993, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[2]  C Ludvigsen,et al.  DANTALE: a new Danish speech material. , 1989, Scandinavian audiology.

[3]  O Dyrlund Characterization of non-linear distortion in hearing aids using coherence analysis. A pilot study. , 1989, Scandinavian audiology.

[4]  O. Dyrlund Coherence measurements in hearing instruments, using different broad-band signals. , 1992, Scandinavian audiology.

[5]  C Elberling,et al.  Prediction of intelligibility of non-linearly processed speech. , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[6]  M. Schroeder Reference Signal for Signal Quality Studies , 1968 .

[7]  D A Preves,et al.  Input stimuli for obtaining frequency responses of automatic gain control hearing aids. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[8]  J M Kates A test suite for hearing aid evaluation. , 1990, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[9]  K. Hecox,et al.  Speech distortion measures for hearing aids. , 1987, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.