You've Got Hypertext

In this paper we consider possible “future everyday hypertext systems.” To ground our discussion, we look first at the functional and conceptual definitions of hypertext that have evolved in the hypertext research community. We then consider these definitions against the Web, the best known current everyday hypertext, but one that the hypertext community has regarded as only partially a hypertext system at best. We propose, however, that a full, rich hypertext is alive and well and living in an equally successful everyday system, and that that system is email. We look at how email meets the criteria, both functionally and conceptually for rich hypertext. We then use email-as-hypertext as our touchstone for assessing future hypertext systems. In particular, we consider the newest system on the Web event horizon, the Semantic Web, and show how the potential hypertextness of the Semantic Web has been anticipated by pre- and co-Web hypertext research systems. We consider how, if informed by the attributes of our email model, the Semantic Web may be able to break away from the limited hypertext model of the Web to become a rich, everyday hypertext system like email. We present three current hypertext research efforts that use the Semantic Web platform to show how these may be seen to embody such email-like hypertext qualities.

[1]  Theodor Holm Nelson,et al.  Xanalogical structure, needed now more than ever: parallel documents, deep links to content, deep versioning, and deep re-use , 1999, CSUR.

[2]  Mark Bernstein Collage, composites, construction , 2003, HYPERTEXT '03.

[3]  N. Meyrowitz,et al.  The missing link: why we're all doing hypertext wrong , 1989 .

[4]  Danny Goodman,et al.  The complete HyperCard handbook , 1998 .

[5]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  Which semantic web? , 2003, HYPERTEXT '03.

[6]  James A. Hendler,et al.  Owl web ontology language 1 , 2002 .

[7]  Les Carr,et al.  The Distributed Link Service: A Tool for Publishers, Authors, and Readers , 1995, WWW.

[8]  Gary Hill,et al.  Open and Reconfigurable Hypermedia Systems: A Filter-Based Model , 1993, Hypermedia.

[9]  Line C. Pouchard,et al.  Hyper/Text/Theory , 1994 .

[10]  Austin Tate,et al.  I-P² - Intelligent Process Panels to Support Coalition Operations , 2002 .

[11]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  Back to the Oral Tradition Through Skywriting at the Speed of Thought , 2003 .

[12]  mc schraefel,et al.  mSpace: interaction design for user-determined, adaptable domain exploration in hypermedia , 2003 .

[13]  Bill N. Schilit,et al.  Linking by inking: trailblazing in a paper-like hypertext , 1998, HYPERTEXT '98.

[14]  Hugh C. Davis,et al.  Towards Multimedia Thesaurus Support for Media-based Navigation , 1998, Image Databases and Multi-Media Search.

[15]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing to Facilitate Browsing: A Look Back at the Hyperties Workstation Browser , 1991, Hypermedia.

[16]  Andries van Dam,et al.  Reading and Writing the Electronic Book , 1985, Computer.

[17]  Kaj Grønbæk,et al.  Open hypermedia as user controlled meta data for the Web , 2000, Comput. Networks.

[18]  Randall H. Trigg,et al.  Notecards in a nutshell , 1986, CHI '87.

[19]  Mark Bernstein Storyspace: hypertext and the process of writing , 1991 .

[20]  Nigel Shadbolt,et al.  CoAKTinG: Collaborative Advanced Knowledge Technologies in the Grid , 2002 .

[21]  Wendy Hall,et al.  Conceptual linking: ontology-based open hypermedia , 2001, WWW '01.

[22]  Mayer D. Schwartz,et al.  The Dexter Hypertext Reference Model , 1994, CACM.

[23]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Scholarly publishing and argument in hyperspace , 2003, WWW '03.

[24]  Monica M. C. Schraefel,et al.  Hunter gatherer: interaction support for the creation and management of within-web-page collections , 2002, WWW.

[25]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Semantic community Web portals , 2000, Comput. Networks.

[26]  E. James Whitehead Control choices and network effects in hypertext systems , 1999, HYPERTEXT '99.

[27]  J. Kristeva,et al.  The Kristeva Reader , 1986 .

[28]  Monica M. C. Schraefel,et al.  Breaking the book: translating the chemistry lab book into a pervasive computing lab environment , 2004, CHI.

[29]  Jeff Conklin,et al.  Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey , 1987, Computer.

[30]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  Logical Versus Analogical or Symbolic Versus Connectionist or Neat Versus Scruffy , 1991, AI Mag..

[31]  Vannevar Bush,et al.  As we may think , 1945, INTR.

[32]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  The visual knowledge builder: a second generation spatial hypertext , 2001, HYPERTEXT '01.

[33]  Hugh Glaser,et al.  CS AKTive space: representing computer science in the semantic web , 2004, WWW '04.

[34]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Semantic Layering with Magpie , 2004, Handbook on Ontologies.

[35]  Nicholas Gibbins,et al.  Applying mSpace Interfaces to the Semantic Web , 2003 .

[36]  Norman Meyrowitz,et al.  Intermedia: The architecture and construction of an object-oriented hypemedia system and applications framework , 1986, OOPLSA '86.

[37]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Aquanet: a hypertext tool to hold your knowledge in place , 1991, HYPERTEXT '91.

[38]  Hugh C. Davis,et al.  Towards an integrated information environment with open hypermedia systems , 1992, ECHT '92.

[39]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  VIKI: spatial hypertext supporting emergent structure , 1994, ECHT '94.

[40]  David De Roure,et al.  Context Slicing the Chemical Aether , 2003 .

[41]  Peter J. Brown,et al.  Turning ideas into products: the Guide system , 1987, Hypertext.

[42]  Steven M. Drucker,et al.  Intermedia: the concept and the construction of a seamless information environment , 1988, Computer.