Time to First Culture Positivity Among Critically Ill Adults With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Growth in Respiratory or Blood Cultures

Background: For critically ill adults receiving empirical vancomycin, the duration of negative cultures after which vancomycin may be discontinued without risking subsequent growth of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains unknown. Objective: We hypothesized that if sputum cultures did not grow MRSA or blood cultures did not grow Gram-positive cocci on Gram stain by 48 hours, those cultures would not subsequently demonstrate MRSA. Methods: We conducted an ancillary analysis from patients enrolled in the Isotonic Solutions and Major Adverse Renal Events Trial (SMART). In this cohort of patients, we collected data on the time of either MRSA identification in culture or Gram-positive cocci identification on Gram stain and rate of vancomycin discontinuation. Results: Of the 15 802 patient admissions in the SMART study, 6553 (41.5%) received empirical intravenous vancomycin. Respiratory sputum cultures demonstrated MRSA during 178 patient admissions. Among respiratory cultures that would ultimately grow MRSA, 85% were positive within 48 hours, and 97% were positive within 72 hours. Cultures demonstrated MRSA bacteremia during 85 patient admissions. In 83 cases (97.6%) of MRSA bacteremia, Gram-positive cocci were identified within 48 hours after the culture was obtained. Conclusion and Relevance: This analysis of a large cohort of critically ill adults receiving empirical vancomycin found that Staphylococcus aureus was present in all but 15% of cases of MRSA-positive respiratory cultures after 48 hours, whereas Gram-positive cocci were identified within 48 hours during nearly all episodes of MRSA bacteremia. These findings may inform the timing of discontinuation of empirical vancomycin among critically ill adults.

[1]  M. Kollef,et al.  Outcomes Associated With De‐escalating Therapy for Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Culture‐Negative Nosocomial Pneumonia , 2019, Chest.

[2]  E. Mylonakis,et al.  The Clinical Utility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nasal Screening to Rule Out MRSA Pneumonia: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis With Antimicrobial Stewardship Implications , 2018, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[3]  B. Posteraro,et al.  T2Bacteria magnetic resonance assay for the rapid detection of ESKAPEc pathogens directly in whole blood , 2018, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[4]  Jesse M. Ehrenfeld,et al.  Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults , 2018, Journal Club AINS.

[5]  S. Cosgrove,et al.  The Role of Negative Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Surveillance Swabs in Predicting the Need for Empiric Vancomycin Therapy , 2017, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[6]  D. Spandidos,et al.  Major pathogen microorganisms except yeasts can be detected from blood cultures within the first three days of incubation: A two-year study from a University Hospital , 2017, Experimental and therapeutic medicine.

[7]  V. Luther,et al.  Frequency of empiric antibiotic de-escalation in an acute care hospital with an established Antimicrobial Stewardship Program , 2016, BMC Infectious Diseases.

[8]  J. Grigg Seeking an Accurate, Point-of-Contact Diagnostic Test for Bacterial Pneumonia. , 2016, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[9]  J. Dawson,et al.  Comparative effectiveness of beta-lactams versus vancomycin for treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections among 122 hospitals. , 2015, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[10]  G. Forrest,et al.  Review of rapid diagnostic tests used by antimicrobial stewardship programs. , 2014, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[11]  R. Ramphal,et al.  Time to Positivity of Blood Cultures Supports Antibiotic De-escalation at 48 Hours , 2014, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[12]  J. Garnacho-Montero,et al.  De-escalation of empirical therapy is associated with lower mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock , 2013, Intensive Care Medicine.

[13]  Frédérique Jacobs,et al.  Antibiotic strategies in severe nosocomial sepsis: Why do we not de-escalate more often?* , 2012, Critical care medicine.

[14]  Sara E Cosgrove,et al.  Clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of america for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children. , 2011, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[15]  J. Morel,et al.  De-escalation as part of a global strategy of empiric antibiotherapy management. A retrospective study in a medico-surgical intensive care unit , 2010, Critical care.

[16]  K. Laupland,et al.  Time to blood culture positivity in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: association with 30-day mortality. , 2010, The Journal of infection.

[17]  J. Carlet,et al.  Epidemiology and control of antibiotic resistance in the intensive care unit , 2004, Current opinion in infectious diseases.