Subcutaneous versus intravenous granulocyte colony stimulating factor for the treatment of neutropenia in hospitalized hemato‐oncological patients: Randomized controlled trial

Intravenous (IV) granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G‐CSF) might be safer and more convenient than subcutaneous (SC) administration to hospitalized hemato‐oncological patients receiving chemotherapy. To compare IV vs. SC G‐CSF administration, we conducted a randomized, open‐label trial. We included inpatients receiving chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, lymphoma or multiple myeloma, and allogeneic or autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Patients were randomized to 5 mcg/kg single daily dose of IV bolus versus SC filgrastim given for its clinical indications. Patients were crossed‐over to the alternate study arm on the subsequent chemotherapy course. The primary outcomes were time from initiation of filgrastim to recovery of stable neutrophil count of >500 cells/µL and a composite clinical outcome of infection or death assessed for the first course post‐randomization. The study was stopped on the second interim analysis. Of 120 patients randomized, 118 were evaluated in the first treatment course. The mean time to neutropenia resolution was longer with IV G‐CSF [7.9 days, 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.6–9.1] compared with SC G‐CSF (5.4 days, 95% CI 4.6–6.2), log‐rank P = 0.001. Longer neutropenia duration was observed in all patient subgroups, except for patients undergoing autologous HCT. There was no significant difference between groups in the occurrence of infection or death, but more deaths were observed with IV (4/57, 7%) versus SC (1/61, 1.6%) G‐CSF administration, P = 0.196. Similar results were observed when all 158 courses following cross‐over were analyzed. Patients reported similar pain and satisfaction scores in both groups. Bolus IV administration of G‐CSF results in longer neutropenia duration than SC administration, with no difference in clinical or quality‐of‐life measures. Am. J. Hematol. 89:243–248, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  G. Lyman,et al.  Colony-stimulating factors for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  Wojciech Krzyzanski,et al.  Population Pharmacokinetic Modelling of Filgrastim in Healthy Adults following Intravenous and Subcutaneous Administrations , 2009, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[3]  Y. Sawada,et al.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of neutrophil proliferation induced by recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF): comparison between intravenous and subcutaneous administration. , 1997, Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin.

[4]  Margaret A Dudeck,et al.  CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. , 2008, American journal of infection control.

[5]  Thomas J. Smith,et al.  2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  D. Follmann,et al.  Kinetics of G–CSF‐induced granulocyte mobilization in healthy subjects: effects of route of administration and addition of dexamethasone , 2002, Transfusion.

[7]  Patricia Muñoz,et al.  Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. , 2008, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[8]  G. Schwarzer,et al.  Granulopoiesis-stimulating factors to prevent adverse effects in the treatment of malignant lymphoma. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[9]  M. Kawagishi,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor after intravenous and subcutaneous administration in the rat. , 1989, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[10]  R. Shadduck,et al.  Comparison of intravenous versus subcutaneous recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with primary myelodysplasia. , 1991, Experimental hematology.

[11]  S. Corey,et al.  G-CSF and GM-CSF in Neutropenia , 2015, The Journal of Immunology.

[12]  Meng Chen,et al.  The optimal choice of medication administration route regarding intravenous, intramuscular, and subcutaneous injection , 2015, Patient preference and adherence.

[13]  Matthias Briel,et al.  Early stopping of randomized clinical trials for overt efficacy is problematic. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[14]  L. Vidal,et al.  Colony-stimulating factors for prevention and treatment of infectious complications in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[15]  P. Nathan,et al.  Meta-analysis: Effect of Prophylactic Hematopoietic Colony-Stimulating Factors on Mortality and Outcomes of Infection , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[16]  M. Sorror,et al.  Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-specific comorbidity index: a new tool for risk assessment before allogeneic HCT. , 2005, Blood.

[17]  C. Seong,et al.  A prospective randomized study on the mobilization of CD34+ cells comparing continuous intravenous vs subcutaneous administration of rhG-CSF in normal donors , 2005, Bone Marrow Transplantation.