Empathic Perspective-Taking and Ethical Decision-Making in Engineering Ethics Education

Ethical decision-making within engineering has not been broadly studied, although there is a growing body of evidence supporting the view that missteps in ethical decision-making result in changes in organizational culture and in disasters which in turn negatively impact a broad number of stakeholders. The ethical decision-making framework we propose in this paper builds on the notion of empathy as central, although not sufficient in of itself, to the ethical decision-making process. We build on work outside of engineering on the role of empathy in ethical reasoning along with an emerging model of empathy within engineering, drawing on literature in the fields of philosophy, social psychology, neuroscience, and engineering education. We first discuss what empathy is and how empathy informs ethical decision-making in general, with a specific focus on the cognitive form of empathy or what we call empathic perspective-taking. Next we explore methods through which engineers might empathically think and act in ethically challenging situations. Finally, we explore a range of engineering contexts and cases that highlight the role empathy plays in coming to an ethically justifiable decision in specific contexts. We conclude with the suggestion that engineering ethics educators need to develop effective tools for developing and assessing empathic perspective-taking to promote ethical decision-making within the practice of engineering.

[1]  J. Hess,et al.  AC 2012-4456: EMPATHY AND CARING AS CONCEPTUALIZED IN- SIDE AND OUTSIDE OF ENGINEERING: EXTENSIVE LITERATURE REVIEW AND FACULTY FOCUS GROUP ANALYSES , 2012 .

[2]  J. Deigh Empathy and Universalizability , 1995, Ethics.

[3]  Donald D. Carpenter,et al.  An Assessment of Engineering Students' Curricular and Co‐Curricular Experiences and Their Ethical Development , 2012 .

[4]  Lorraine G. Kisselburgh,et al.  An ethics transfer case assessment tool for measuring ethical reasoning abilities of engineering students using reflexive principlism approach , 2014, 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings.

[5]  Donna Riley,et al.  Engineering and Social Justice: In the University and Beyond , 2008 .

[6]  Daniel A. Vallero,et al.  Macroethics and Engineering Leadership , 2008 .

[7]  P. Vesilind,et al.  Socially responsible engineering : justice in risk management , 2006 .

[8]  C. Batson,et al.  Perspective Taking: Imagining How Another Feels Versus Imaging How You Would Feel , 1997 .

[9]  Sara H. Konrath,et al.  Changes in Dispositional Empathy in American College Students Over Time: A Meta-Analysis , 2011, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[10]  Mark W. Baldwin,et al.  Priming relationship schemas: My advisor and the pope are watching me from the back of my mind , 1990 .

[11]  Robert Niewoehner,et al.  The Loss of the Space Shuttle Columbia: Portaging Leadership Lessons with a Critical Thinking Model , 2008 .

[12]  Merel Noorman,et al.  Responsibility Practices in Robotic Warfare , 2014 .

[13]  Lorraine G. Kisselburgh,et al.  Effectively Engaging Engineers in Ethical Reasoning about Emerging Technologies: A Cyber-Enabled Framework of Scaffolded, Integrated, and Reflexive Analysis of Cases , 2014 .

[14]  Ezra Stotland,et al.  Exploratory Investigations of Empathy1 , 1969 .

[15]  Marco Iacoboni,et al.  Mirroring People: The Science of Empathy and How We Connect With Others. , 2013, Partner Abuse.

[16]  Matthew W. Ohland,et al.  ABET Criterion 3.f: How Much Curriculum Content is Enough? , 2012, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[17]  Julinna C. Oxley The Moral Dimensions of Empathy , 2011 .

[18]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration , 1992 .

[19]  Andrew O. Brightman,et al.  Reflexive Principlism as an Effective Approach for Developing Ethical Reasoning in Engineering , 2016, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[20]  Simone van der Burg,et al.  Understanding moral responsibility in the design of trailers , 2005 .

[21]  Juan Manuel Iranzo,et al.  Revisión Crítica: De Waal, Frans (2009). The Age of Empathy. Nature’s Lessons for a Kinder Society. Nueva York: Harmony Books. , 2010 .

[22]  R. Freeman Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[23]  Carla B. Zoltowski,et al.  AC 2011-1833: THE CREATION OF TOOLS FOR ASSESSING ETHICAL AWARENESS IN DIVERSE MULTI-DISCIPLINARY PROGRAMS , 2011 .

[24]  Julinna C. Oxley The Moral Dimensions of Empathy: Limits and Applications in Ethical Theory and Practice , 2011 .

[25]  Sara D. Hodges,et al.  Automatic and controlled empathy , 1997 .

[26]  Henrik Danielsson,et al.  Empathy among students in engineering programmes , 2012 .

[27]  J. Berenguer,et al.  The Effect of Empathy in Proenvironmental Attitudes and Behaviors , 2007 .

[28]  D. Haws Ethics Instruction in Engineering Education: A (Mini) Meta‐Analysis , 2001 .

[29]  Rui Pan,et al.  Empathy and care within engineering: qualitative perspectives from engineering faculty and practicing engineers , 2013 .

[30]  Sabine Roeser,et al.  Emotional Engineers: Toward Morally Responsible Design , 2010, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[31]  Gregory Hickok,et al.  The Myth of Mirror Neurons: The Real Neuroscience of Communication and Cognition , 2014 .

[32]  Daniel A. Vallero,et al.  Preventing Disputes with Empathy , 2006 .