Validation of wearable activity monitors for real-time cadence

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to establish evidence of validity for wearable activity monitors providing real-time cadence against a criterion measure. Thirty-six healthy adults, aged 18–65 years, participated in the study. Four activity monitors including 2 watch-based monitors and 2 cadence sensors attaching to shoelaces were tested. Each participant completed the study protocol consisting of 2 distinct components: (1) treadmill protocol and (2) overground protocol. Lin’s concordance correlation and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) were calculated for the comparisons between the criterion and measures of the monitors. Bland–Altman analysis was performed to determine the mean bias and 95% limits of agreement. All activity monitors showed high correlations with the criterion measures (p < .01). Lower correlations were observed at slow walking speeds in the watch-based monitors. In contrast, consistent and strong correlations were found with both cadence sensors regardless of walking speeds (p < .01). Similar patterns were observed in the MAPE scores. Greater than 90% of the participants were able to maintain prescribed walking intensity using real-time cadence. The results suggest that the wearable activity monitors are an acceptable measure of real-time cadence and provide the potential to improve intensity-based prescription of physical activity using the monitors.

[1]  Aaron Beighle,et al.  Determination of step rate thresholds corresponding to physical activity intensity classifications in adults. , 2011, Journal of physical activity & health.

[2]  Catrine Tudor-Locke,et al.  Utility of pedometers for assessing physical activity: convergent validity. , 2002, Sports medicine.

[3]  D. Rowe,et al.  Evaluation of inactive adults' ability to maintain a moderate-intensity walking pace. , 2013, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[4]  Lisa M Barnett,et al.  Global participation in sport and leisure-time physical activities: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, Preventive medicine.

[5]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .

[6]  J. Pillay,et al.  Steps that count: physical activity recommendations, brisk walking, and steps per minute--how do they relate? , 2014, Journal of Physical Activity and Health.

[7]  J. Takács,et al.  Validation of the Fitbit One activity monitor device during treadmill walking. , 2014, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[8]  Gregory J Welk,et al.  Validity of consumer-based physical activity monitors. , 2014, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  S. Edney,et al.  Users’ experiences of wearable activity trackers: a cross-sectional study , 2017, BMC Public Health.

[10]  Thea J. M. Kooiman,et al.  Reliability and Validity of Ten Consumer Activity Trackers Depend on Walking Speed , 2017, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[11]  Scott E. Maxwell,et al.  Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective , 1990 .

[12]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  Using step cadence goals to increase moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity. , 2013, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[13]  D. Thompson,et al.  Evaluation of activity monitors in controlled and free-living environments. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[14]  Scott E. Crouter,et al.  Validity of Consumer-Based Physical Activity Monitors for Estimating Energy Expenditure in Youth , 2017 .

[15]  G. Abt,et al.  Walking cadence required to elicit criterion moderate-intensity physical activity is moderated by fitness status , 2019, Journal of sports sciences.

[16]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  GPOWER: A general power analysis program , 1996 .

[17]  D. Kimmerly,et al.  Step Rate Thresholds Associated with Moderate and Vigorous Physical Activity in Adults , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[18]  L. John,et al.  Financial incentives for exercise adherence in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2013, American journal of preventive medicine.

[19]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Abstract MP11: Fitbit: An Accurate and Reliable Device for Wireless Physical Activity Tracking , 2015 .

[20]  R. A. Bailey Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: a Model Comparison Perspective, 2nd edn , 2005 .

[21]  Paul Hibbing,et al.  Comparative evaluation of heart rate-based monitors: Apple Watch vs Fitbit Charge HR , 2018, Journal of sports sciences.

[22]  Diana Adler,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 2016 .

[23]  Gregory J Welk,et al.  Comparison of Consumer and Research Monitors under Semistructured Settings. , 2016, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[24]  D. J. van der Valk,et al.  How accurately can sitting and the intensity of walking and cycling be classified using an accelerometer on the waist for the purpose of the “Global recommendations on physical activity for health”? , 2015 .

[25]  Thea J. M. Kooiman,et al.  Reliability and validity of ten consumer activity trackers , 2015, BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation.

[26]  John Staudenmayer,et al.  Walking cadence (steps/min) and intensity in 21–40 year olds: CADENCE-adults , 2019, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[27]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[28]  David R Bassett,et al.  2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[29]  G. Wendel-Vos,et al.  A Systematic Review of Financial Incentives for Physical Activity: The Effects on Physical Activity and Related Outcomes , 2017, Behavioral medicine.

[30]  W. Hays Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[31]  GREGORY J. WELK,et al.  Stride rate recommendations for moderate-intensity walking. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[32]  Minsoo Kang,et al.  How fast is fast enough? Walking cadence (steps/min) as a practical estimate of intensity in adults: a narrative review , 2018, British Journal of Sports Medicine.