Exploring empathy in cyberbullying with serious games

[1]  Iván Martínez-Ortiz,et al.  Serious games to prevent and detect bullying and cyberbullying: A systematic serious games and literature review , 2020, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Paula Costa Ferreira,et al.  Responsive bystander behaviour in cyberbullying: a path through self-efficacy , 2019, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[3]  Cendri A. C. Hutcherson,et al.  Empathy is hard work: People choose to avoid empathy because of its cognitive costs. , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  M. Hock,et al.  Bystanders of bullying: Social-cognitive and affective reactions to school bullying and cyberbullying , 2018, Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace.

[5]  P. Ferreira,et al.  University students’ perceptions of campus climate, cyberbullying and cultural issues: implications for theory and practice , 2018 .

[6]  S. DiPaola,et al.  A computational model of empathy for interactive agents , 2018, Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures.

[7]  Sofia Mateus Francisco,et al.  Cyberbullying: Shaping the use of verbal aggression through normative moral beliefs and self-efficacy , 2018, New Media Soc..

[8]  Francisco C. Santos,et al.  Engineering Pro-Sociality With Autonomous Agents , 2018, AAAI.

[9]  Karolien Poels,et al.  The efficacy of the Friendly Attac serious digital game to promote prosocial bystander behavior in cyberbullying among young adolescents: A cluster-randomized controlled trial , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  T. Schoeler,et al.  Assessing the consequences of cyberbullying on mental health , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.

[11]  Kimberley R. Allison,et al.  Individual and collective moral influences on intervention in cyberbullying , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  Thomas W. Schubert,et al.  Empathic Concern Is Part of a More General Communal Emotion , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[13]  Sigal Eden,et al.  Bystanders’ Behavior in Cyberbullying Episodes , 2017, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[14]  Karolien Poels,et al.  "Thinking before posting?" Reducing cyber harassment on social networking sites through a reflective message , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Magdalena Obermaier,et al.  Bystanding or standing by? How the number of bystanders affects the intention to intervene in cyberbullying , 2016, New Media Soc..

[16]  L. Harris,et al.  The Emotional Cost of Humanity , 2016 .

[17]  Kay Bussey,et al.  The effect of victims' responses to overt bullying on same-sex peer bystander reactions. , 2015, Journal of school psychology.

[18]  Junji Yamato,et al.  Analyzing Interpersonal Empathy via Collective Impressions , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[19]  Peter A. M. Ruijten,et al.  Lonely and Susceptible: The Influence of Social Exclusion and Gender on Persuasion by an Artificial Agent , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[20]  Roger Fontaine,et al.  Does cyberbullying overlap with school bullying when taking modality of involvement into account? , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  Paula Costa Ferreira,et al.  Cyberbullying: The hidden side of college students , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  R. Reisenzein A Short History of Psychological Perspectives on Emotion , 2015 .

[23]  Christian Keysers,et al.  Dissociating the ability and propensity for empathy , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Empathic Robots for Long-term Interaction , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[25]  Peter P. Groenewegen,et al.  Hierarchical linear modeling , 2014 .

[26]  B. Zimmerman From Cognitive Modeling to Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Career Path , 2013 .

[27]  São Luís Castro,et al.  Medir a empatia: Adaptação portuguesa do Índice de Reactividade Interpessoal , 2013 .

[28]  Klaus R. Scherer,et al.  The Nature and Dynamics of Relevance and Valence Appraisals: Theoretical Advances and Recent Evidence , 2013 .

[29]  H. Machácková,et al.  Bystanders' Support of Cyberbullied Schoolmates , 2013 .

[30]  Fran C. Blumberg,et al.  Serious Games: What Are They? What Do They Do? Why Should We Play Them? , 2012 .

[31]  Catholijn M. Jonker,et al.  A Conversation Model Enabling Intelligent Agents to Give Emotional Support , 2012, Modern Advances in Intelligent Systems and Tools.

[32]  Henry Lieberman,et al.  Common Sense Reasoning for Detection, Prevention, and Mitigation of Cyberbullying , 2012, TIIS.

[33]  Bernhard Schmitz,et al.  A plea for self-regulated learning as a process: Modelling, measuring and intervening , 2011 .

[34]  C. Jonker,et al.  Simulating Peer Support for Victims of Cyberbullying , 2010 .

[35]  Jean Decety,et al.  The Neurodevelopment of Empathy in Humans , 2010, Developmental Neuroscience.

[36]  Jonathan Belman Designing Games to Foster Empathy , 2010 .

[37]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Virtual learning intervention to reduce bullying victimization in primary school: a controlled trial. , 2010, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[38]  Hua Wang,et al.  Multimodality and Interactivity: Connecting Properties of Serious Games with Educational Outcomes , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[39]  T. Singer,et al.  The Social Neuroscience of Empathy , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Nancy Eisenberg,et al.  Empathic responding: Sympathy and personal distress. , 2009 .

[41]  Juan Calmaestra,et al.  The emotional impact on victims of traditional bullying and cyberbullying: A study of Spanish adolescents. , 2009 .

[42]  Jaap Ham,et al.  A robot that says “bad!”: Using negative and positive social feedback from a robotic agent to save energy , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[43]  Amanda B. Nickerson,et al.  Attachment and empathy as predictors of roles as defenders or outsiders in bullying interactions. , 2008, Journal of school psychology.

[44]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  Mixed methods for mixed reality: understanding users’ avatar activities in virtual worlds , 2008 .

[45]  Michael R. Mullen,et al.  Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit , 2008 .

[46]  A. Bandura Toward a Psychology of Human Agency , 2006, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[47]  J. Prinz,et al.  The emotional basis of moral judgments , 2006 .

[48]  Bernhard Schmitz,et al.  New perspectives for the evaluation of training sessions in self-regulated learning: Time-series analyses of diary data , 2006 .

[49]  Gillian Ku,et al.  Perspective-Taking and Self-Other Overlap: Fostering Social Bonds and Facilitating Social Coordination , 2005 .

[50]  Ana Paiva,et al.  LEARNING BY FEELING: EVOKING EMPATHY WITH SYNTHETIC CHARACTERS , 2005, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[51]  R. Hayward Empathy , 1971, The Lancet.

[52]  David A. Lishner,et al.  “... As you Would have Them Do Unto You”: Does Imagining Yourself in the Other's Place Stimulate Moral Action? , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[53]  A. Bandura Selective Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency , 2002 .

[54]  K. Scherer Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. , 2001 .

[55]  C. Nass,et al.  Are Machines Gender Neutral? Gender‐Stereotypic Responses to Computers With Voices , 1997 .

[56]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[57]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[58]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.