Faction and Ideology: Thomas Starkey's Dialogue

Thomas Starkey's (c. 1495–1538) Dialogue between Reginald Pole and Thomas Lupset is one of the most significant works of political thought written in English between Fortescue and Hooker, for several reasons. It gives insight into its author's intellectual background – Oxford, Paris, Avignon, Padua, Venice – which he shared with many of the other ideologues of the Henrician state. More than that, the Dialogue represents one of the first attempts to blend continental humanism of a Venetian variety, and perhaps Florentine as well, with native English traditions in the creation of a theoretical justification for what Starkey called a ‘mixed state’. In this and in the practical reform proposals which issued from it, Starkey went beyond Thomas More, however superior Utopia may be as a work of literature, or how much more directly it seems to speak to us. The work is also worthy of attention for Starkey's own standing, even if hisinfluence with Thomas Cromwell was shortlived. G. R. Elton has begun this sort of study by using Starkey'sreforms to explore the intellectual underpinnings of the Cromwellian reform. Aside from this effort, interpretation has not been very successful. The Dialogue is undoubtedly a daunting work, not because of the inherent difficulty of its arguments, but rather the extreme eclecticism of the author and his attempt to fulfil two apparently discrepant purposes. It is precisely on this last point that modern criticism has fallen down most seriously. I would like to suggest that placing the work in its proper context in Starkey's life allows not only the recovery of those two conflicting intentions, but also a sketch of the motives underlying them. This will involve an examination of the only surviving manuscript of the Dialogue.

[1]  Paul B. Van Dyke Reginald Pole and Thomas Cromwell: An Examination of the Apologia Ad Carolum Quintum , 1904 .

[2]  G. Mattingly A Humanist Ambassador , 1932, The Journal of Modern History.

[3]  G. Spini Tra rinascimento e riforma : Antonio Brucioli , 1940 .

[4]  W. S. Hudson John Ponet (1516?-1556) : advocate of limited monarchy , 1943 .

[5]  H. Lipscomb,et al.  The Classical Republicans: An Essay in the Recovery of a Pattern of Thought in Seventeenth Century England , 2011 .

[6]  R. Bainton,et al.  Reginald Pole : cardinal of England , 1951 .

[7]  G. Elton The Political Creed of Thomas Cromwell , 1956, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society.

[8]  S. Lehmberg English Humanists, the Reformation, and the Problem of Counsel , 1961 .

[9]  I. Newton,et al.  Opera quae exstant omnia , 1964 .

[10]  Stuart E. Prall The Development of Equity in Tudor England , 1964 .

[11]  P. Laslett,et al.  Philosophy, Politics And Society , 1956 .

[12]  A. Ferguson The articulate citizen and the English Renaissance , 1965 .

[13]  Reginald Pole,et al.  Pole's defense of the Unity of the church , 1965 .

[14]  J. S. Brewer,et al.  Letters and papers, foreign and domestic, of the reign of Henry VIII. , 1965 .

[15]  W. Bouwsma Venice and the Defense of Republican Liberty: Renaissance Values in the Age of the Counter Reformation , 1968 .

[16]  G. Elton Reform by statute : Thomas Starkey's Dialogue and Thomas Cromwell's policy , 1968 .

[17]  W. G. Zeeveld Foundations of Tudor Policy , 1969 .

[18]  S. Lehmberg The Reformation parliament 1529-1536 , 1970 .

[19]  G. Burnet The History of the Reformation of the Church of England , 1970 .

[20]  G. Mattingly Catherine of Aragon , 1971 .

[21]  Barbara Shapiro Reform and Renewal, Thomas Cromwell and the Common Weal , 1973 .

[22]  G. Elton Presidential Address: Tudor Government: The Points of Contact III. The Court , 1975 .

[23]  Thomas F. Dunn The Development of the Text of Pole's "De Unitate Ecclesiae" , 1976, The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America.

[24]  G. Elton Reform and reformation: England 1509-1558 , 1978 .

[25]  G. Nicholson The nature and function of historical argument in the Henrician Reformation , 1977 .

[26]  K. Sharpe Sir Robert Cotton, 1586-1631: History and Politics in Early Modern England , 1979 .

[27]  J. Guy The Tudor Commonwealth: Revising Thomas Cromwell , 1980, The Historical Journal.

[28]  P. Holmes Resistance and Compromise: The Political Thought of the Elizabethan Catholics , 1982 .

[29]  G. Elton The Tudor constitution : documents and commentary , 1983 .