One-year survival among patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock, and its relation to early revascularization: results from the GUSTO-I trial.

BACKGROUND Although 30-day survival is increased in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock who undergo coronary revascularization, the longer-term outcome in such patients and the duration of benefit from revascularization are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS We analyzed 30-day survivors of acute myocardial infarction in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue-Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) trial and identified 36 333 who had not had cardiogenic shock (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg for >/=1 hour, group 1) and 1321 patients who had shock (group 2). Group 2 patients were older and sicker. At 1 year, 97.4% of group 1 patients were alive versus 88.0% of group 2 (P=0.0001). Among group 2 patients, 578 (44%) had undergone revascularization within 30 days (group 2A) and 728 (56%) had not (group 2B). Revascularization was not required by protocol but was selected by the attending physicians. At 1 year, 91.7% of group 2A patients were alive versus 85.3% of group 2B (P=0.0003). With the use of multivariable logistic regression analysis to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics of shock patients alive at 30 days, revascularization within 30 days was independently associated with reduced 1-year mortality (odds ratio 0.6, [95% confidence interval 0.4, 0.9], P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS Most patients (88%) with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock who are alive at 30 days survived at least 1 year. Shock patients who underwent revascularization within 30 days had improved survival at 1 year compared with shock patients who did not receive revascularization, even after adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups.

[1]  R. Califf,et al.  Impact of an aggressive invasive catheterization and revascularization strategy on mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) trial. An observational study. , 1997, Circulation.

[2]  R. Califf,et al.  Difference in countries' use of resources and clinical outcome for patients with cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction: results from the GUSTO trial , 1997, The Lancet.

[3]  C. Simpfendorfer,et al.  Early and 1-year survival rates in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a retrospective study comparing coronary angioplasty with medical treatment. , 1995, American heart journal.

[4]  E R Bates,et al.  Contemporary reperfusion therapy for cardiogenic shock: the GUSTO-I trial experience. The GUSTO-I Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  J Col,et al.  Predictors of 30-day mortality in the era of reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction. Results from an international trial of 41,021 patients. GUSTO-I Investigators. , 1995, Circulation.

[6]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Current Spectrum of Cardiogenic Shock and Effect of Early Revascularization on Mortality Results of an International Registry , 1995 .

[7]  Frans Van de Werf,et al.  An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  R. Califf,et al.  Prognosis in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction in the interventional era. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  K. Bailey,et al.  Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients with cardiogenic shock. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  A. Garson Clinical research on children in the 1990s. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  W. O’Neill,et al.  Multicenter registry of angioplasty therapy of cardiogenic shock: initial and long-term survival. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  E. Verna,et al.  Emergency coronary angioplasty in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction or cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. , 1989, European heart journal.

[13]  W. O’Neill,et al.  Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty improves survival in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. , 1988, Circulation.

[14]  J. Benjamin,et al.  Cardiogenic shock in evolving myocardial infarction: treatment by angioplasty and streptokinase. , 1987, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.