Semi-analytic reconstruction uses the analytic solution to a second-order, steady, ordinary differential equation (ODE) to simultaneously evaluate the convective and diffusive flux at all interfaces of a finite volume formulation. The second-order ODE is itself a linearized approximation to the governing first- and second- order partial differential equation conservation laws. Thus, semi-analytic reconstruction defines a family of formulations for finite volume interface fluxes using analytic solutions to approximating equations. Limiters are not applied in a conventional sense; rather, diffusivity is adjusted in the vicinity of changes in sign of eigenvalues in order to achieve a sufficiently small cell Reynolds number in the analytic formulation across critical points. Several approaches for application of semi-analytic reconstruction for the solution of one-dimensional scalar equations are introduced. Results are compared with exact analytic solutions to Burger s Equation as well as a conventional, upwind discretization using Roe s method. One approach, the end-point wave speed (EPWS) approximation, is further developed for more complex applications. One-dimensional vector equations are tested on a quasi one-dimensional nozzle application. The EPWS algorithm has a more compact difference stencil than Roe s algorithm but reconstruction time is approximately a factor of four larger than for Roe. Though both are second-order accurate schemes, Roe s method approaches a grid converged solution with fewer grid points. Reconstruction of flux in the context of multi-dimensional, vector conservation laws including effects of thermochemical nonequilibrium in the Navier-Stokes equations is developed.
[1]
Peter A. Gnoffo,et al.
Computational Fluid Dynamics Technology for Hypersonic Applications
,
2003
.
[2]
B. V. Leer,et al.
Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method
,
1979
.
[3]
Peter A. Gnoffo,et al.
Computational Aerothermodynamic Simulation Issues on Unstructured Grids
,
2004
.
[4]
W. K. Anderson,et al.
An implicit upwind algorithm for computing turbulent flows on unstructured grids
,
1994
.
[5]
Analytical and computational study of wall temperature jumps in supersonic flow
,
1999
.
[6]
P. Lax,et al.
On Upstream Differencing and Godunov-Type Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws
,
1983
.
[7]
G. Inger.
Triple-deck theory of supersonic laminar viscous–inviscid interaction due to wall temperature jumps
,
2007
.
[8]
P. Roe.
Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes
,
1997
.
[9]
Bram van Leer,et al.
On the Relation Between the Upwind-Differencing Schemes of Godunov, Engquist–Osher and Roe
,
1984
.
[10]
J. Anderson,et al.
Hypersonic and High-Temperature Gas Dynamics
,
2019
.
[11]
Peter A. Gnoffo,et al.
Analytic Corrections to Computational Heating Predictions Accounting for Changes in Surface Catalysis
,
1998
.
[12]
H. C. Yee,et al.
On symmetric and upwind TVD schemes
,
1985
.