Collaboration Network and Trends of Global Coronavirus Disease Research: A Scientometric Analysis

As a global pandemic threatens health and livelihoods, finding effective treatments has become a vital issue that requires worldwide collaboration. This study examines research collaboration and network profiles through a case study of coronavirus diseases, including both the extinct severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and the emerging species (SARS-CoV-2). A scientometric process was designed to apply quantitative tools and a qualitative approach employing technological expertise to accomplish a three-level collaboration analysis. The text mining software, VantagePoint, was used to analyze research articles from the Web of Science database to identify the key national, organizational, and individual players in the coronavirus research field combined with indicators, namely, the breadth and depth of collaboration. The results show that China and the United States are at the center of coronavirus research networks at all three levels, including many endeavors involving single or joint entities. This study demonstrates how governments, public sectors, and private sectors, such as the pharmaceutical industry, can use scientometric analysis to gain insight into the holistic research trends and networks of players in this field, leading to the formulation of strategies to strengthen research and development programs. Furthermore, this approach can be utilized as a visualization and decision support tool for further policy planning, identification and execution of collaboration, and research exchange opportunities. This scientometric process should be directly applicable to other fields.

[1]  S. K. Jalal.  Co-authorship and co-occurrences analysis using Bibliometrix R-package: a casestudy of India and Bangladesh , 2019 .

[2]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Forecasting Innovation Pathways (FIP) for new and emerging science and technologies , 2013 .

[3]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Oscar F. Castellanos,et al.  Technology intelligence: Methods and capabilities for generation of knowledge and decision making , 2010, PICMET 2010 TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT FOR GLOBAL ECONOMIC GROWTH.

[5]  A. L. Porter,et al.  Comparing methods to extract technical content for technological intelligence , 2012, 2012 Proceedings of PICMET '12: Technology Management for Emerging Technologies.

[6]  Alisa Kongthon,et al.  Identify Potential Opportunity for Research Collaboration Using Bibliometrics , 2018 .

[7]  Anuj Sharma,et al.  Bibliometric overview of the Technological Forecasting and Social Change journal: Analysis from 1970 to 2018 , 2020 .

[8]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Consolidation in a crisis: Patterns of international collaboration in early COVID-19 research , 2020, PloS one.

[9]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  Opinion Mining, Sentiment Analysis and Emotion Understanding in Advertising: A Bibliometric Analysis , 2020, IEEE Access.

[10]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance , 2005, Science.

[11]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations , 2004, Scientometrics.

[12]  J. Nájera-Sanchez.  A Systematic Review of Sustainable Banking through a Co-Word Analysis , 2019, Sustainability.

[13]  Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Collaboration Patterns as a Function of Article Genre among Mixed Researchers: A Mixed Methods Bibliometric Study , 2017 .

[14]  O. Persson,et al.  Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration , 1992 .

[15]  J. Nájera-Sanchez,et al.  Mapping the conceptual structure of environmental management: a co-word analysis , 2019, Business: Theory and Practice.

[16]  M E J Newman,et al.  Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  A. Monto,et al.  Epidemiology of viral respiratory infections , 2002, The American Journal of Medicine.

[18]  A. Lis.  Keywords Co-occurrence Analysis of Research on Sustainable Enterprise and Sustainable Organisation , 2018 .

[19]  Melanie J. Norton,et al.  Introductory Concepts in Information Science , 2010 .

[20]  O. S. Albahri,et al.  Sentiment analysis and its applications in fighting COVID-19 and infectious diseases: A systematic review , 2020, Expert Systems with Applications.

[21]  Dawn Freshwater,et al.  International research collaboration , 2006 .

[22]  Ibrahim A. Hameed,et al.  A Bibliometric Analysis of Corona Pandemic in Social Sciences: A Review of Influential Aspects and Conceptual Structure , 2020, IEEE Access.

[23]  Linlin Wu,et al.  Travel mode choice and their impacts on environment—a literature review based on bibliometric and content analysis, 2000–2018 , 2020 .

[24]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis , 2017, Scientometrics.

[25]  A. Hassanien,et al.  Sentiment Analysis of COVID-19 tweets by Deep Learning Classifiers—A study to show how popularity is affecting accuracy in social media , 2020, Applied Soft Computing.

[26]  Yun Liu,et al.  Multilevel Analysis of International Scientific Collaboration Network in the Influenza Virus Vaccine Field: 2006–2013 , 2018 .

[27]  Y. Geng,et al.  A bibliometric analysis on waste electrical and electronic equipment research , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[28]  M. Bayram,et al.  COVID-19 Digital Health Innovation Policy: A Portal to Alternative Futures in the Making. , 2020, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[29]  M. Taqi.  Marketing concept evolution: a bibliometrics co-occurrence analysis , 2019, Marketing and Management of Innovations.

[30]  Bruna de Paula Fonseca e Fonseca,et al.  Co-authorship network analysis in health research: method and potential use , 2016, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[31]  M E Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[32]  Mario Coccia,et al.  Allometric models to measure and analyze the evolution of international research collaboration , 2016, Scientometrics.

[33]  K. S. Kumar,et al.  Research collaboration and knowledge sharing in e-governance , 2019, Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy.

[34]  R. Law,et al.  Analyzing co-authoring communities of tourism research collaboration , 2020 .

[35]  M. Coccia,et al.  Evolution and convergence of the patterns of international scientific collaboration , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  David Probert,et al.  Developing a Technology Intelligence Strategy at Kodak European Research: Scan & Target , 2010 .

[37]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Tech Mining: Exploiting New Technologies for Competitive Advantage , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[38]  Man Hung,et al.  Social Network Analysis of COVID-19 Sentiments: Application of Artificial Intelligence , 2020, Journal of medical Internet research.

[39]  G. Rubin,et al.  The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence , 2020, The Lancet.

[40]  S. Gauch,et al.  Analysing published global Ebola Virus Disease research using social network analysis , 2017, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[41]  Jaideep P. Sundaram,et al.  Health Innovation Networks to Help Developing Countries Address Neglected Diseases , 2005, Science.

[42]  The 2019 novel corona virus outbreak – An institutional guideline , 2020, Indian journal of anaesthesia.

[43]  J. Youtie,et al.  Refining search terms for nanotechnology , 2008 .

[44]  M. E. El Zowalaty,et al.  From SARS to COVID-19: A previously unknown SARS- related coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) of pandemic potential infecting humans – Call for a One Health approach , 2020, One Health.

[45]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity , 2005 .

[46]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Mapping child-computer interaction research through co-word analysis , 2020, Int. J. Child Comput. Interact..

[47]  Gaston Heimeriks,et al.  Mapping research topics using word-reference co-occurrences: A method and an exploratory case study , 2006, Scientometrics.

[48]  Hai-long Ma,et al.  The Effect of Geographical Proximity on Scientific Cooperation among Chinese Cities from 1990 to 2010 , 2014, PloS one.

[49]  Richa Kumari,et al.  Topic modelling and social network analysis of publications and patents in humanoid robot technology , 2019, J. Inf. Sci..

[50]  Olle Persson,et al.  The measurement of international scientific collaboration , 1993, Scientometrics.

[51]  A. Porter,et al.  Profiling Leading Scientists in Nanobiomedical Science: Interdisciplinarity and Potential Leading Indicators of Research Directions , 2011 .

[52]  Elizabeth A. Corley,et al.  Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital , 2004 .

[53]  Nader Ale Ebrahim,et al.  Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Time-Series Classification Using Deep Learning , 2020, IEEE Access.

[54]  L. H. Nguyen,et al.  Economic evaluation studies in the field of HIV/AIDS: bibliometric analysis on research development and scopes (GAPRESEARCH) , 2019, BMC Health Services Research.

[55]  M. Coccia.  An index to quantify environmental risk of exposure to future epidemics of the COVID-19 and similar viral agents: Theory and practice , 2020, Environmental Research.

[56]  Diana Hicks,et al.  How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model , 1997, Scientometrics.

[57]  F. Squazzoni,et al.  Understanding COVID-19 diffusion requires an interdisciplinary, multi-dimensional approach , 2020, Environmental Research.

[58]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Tech mining to validate and refine a technology roadmap , 2018 .

[59]  Bin Li,et al.  A Scientometric Analysis of Global Terahertz Research by Web of Science Data , 2020, IEEE Access.

[60]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[61]  Stephen M Fiore,et al.  The Science of Team Science: A Review of the Empirical Evidence and Research Gaps on Collaboration in Science , 2018, The American psychologist.

[62]  Mario Coccia,et al.  Factors determining the diffusion of COVID-19 and suggested strategy to prevent future accelerated viral infectivity similar to COVID , 2020, Science of The Total Environment.

[63]  Jing Liu,et al.  Mapping theme trends and knowledge structures for human neural stem cells: a quantitative and co-word biclustering analysis for the 2013–2018 period , 2019, Neural regeneration research.

[64]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  The relationship among research productivity, research collaboration, and their determinants , 2017, J. Informetrics.

[65]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Science in Scandinavia: A Bibliometric Approach , 2000, Scientometrics.

[66]  Bangrae Lee,et al.  Mapping Korea’s national R&D domain of robot technology by using the co-word analysis , 2008, Scientometrics.

[67]  S. Russo,et al.  UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COOPERATION NETWORK IN ACADEMIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL PRODUCTIVITY , 2018, Revista Gestão Inovação e Tecnologias.

[68]  Jan Youtie,et al.  Research collaboration experiences, good and bad: Dispatches from the front lines , 2016 .

[69]  COVID-19 and the policy sciences: initial reactions and perspectives , 2020, Policy sciences.

[70]  Jan Youtie,et al.  Where does nanotechnology belong in the map of science? , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.