Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

BACKGROUND Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is found in 5% to 10% of men aged 65 to 79 years. The major complication is rupture which presents as a surgical emergency. The mortality after rupture is high, 80% for patients reaching hospital and 50% for those undergoing surgery for emergency repair. Currently elective surgical repair is recommended for aneurysms discovered to be larger than 5.5 cm to prevent rupture. There is interest in population screening to detect, monitor and repair abdominal aortic aneurysms before rupture. OBJECTIVES To determine the effects of screening asymptomatic individuals for AAA on mortality, subsequent treatment, quality of life and cost effectiveness of screening. SEARCH STRATEGY The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group searched their Trials Register (last searched 26 January 2007) and CENTRAL (last searched Issue 1, 2007). SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials of population screening for AAA. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed trials and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS Four studies involving 127,891 men and 9,342 women were included in this review. Only one study included women. Results for men and women were analysed separately. Three to five years after screening there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between screened and unscreened groups for men or women (men, odds ratio (OR) 0.95; 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 1.07; for women OR 1.06; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.21). There was a significant decrease in mortality from AAA in men (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.78), but not for women (OR 1.99; 95% CI 0.36 to 10.88). In this analysis mortality includes death from rupture and from emergency or elective surgery for aneurysm repair. There was also a decreased incidence of ruptured aneurysm in men (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.99) but not in women (OR 1.49; 95% CI 0.25 to 8.94). There was a significant increase in surgery for AAA in men (OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.59 to 2.59). This was not reported in women. There were no data on life expectancy, complications of surgery or subjective quality of life. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is evidence of a significant reduction in mortality from AAA in men aged 65 to 79 years who undergo ultrasound screening. There is insufficient evidence to demonstrate benefit in women. The cost effectiveness may be acceptable, but needs further expert analysis. These findings need careful consideration in judging whether a co-ordinated population-based screening programme should be introduced.

[1]  J. Lindholt,et al.  Psychological consequences of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm and conservative treatment of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2000, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[2]  K. Jamrozik,et al.  Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: lessons from a population‐based study , 2000, The Medical journal of Australia.

[3]  H A Ashton,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in women , 2002, The British journal of surgery.

[4]  K. Johnston,et al.  Nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: six-year follow-up results from the multicenter prospective Canadian aneurysm study. Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery Aneurysm Study Group. , 1994, Journal of vascular surgery.

[5]  J. Lindholt,et al.  Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: single centre randomised controlled trial , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  Konrad Jamrozik,et al.  Population based randomised controlled trial on impact of screening on mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  C. Quick,et al.  Epidemiology and potential for prevention of abdominal aortic aneurysm , 1998, The British journal of surgery.

[8]  S. Thompson,et al.  Late results concerning feasibility and compliance from a randomized trial of ultrasonographic screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm , 2002, The British journal of surgery.

[9]  J. Lindholt,et al.  Impaired results of a randomised double blinded clinical trial of propranolol versus placebo on the expansion rate of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 1999, International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology.

[10]  P. Basnyat,et al.  Mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in Wales , 1999, The British journal of surgery.

[11]  J. Lindholt,et al.  [Preliminary results of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in the ounty of Viborg]. , 1997, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[12]  K. Vardulaki,et al.  Quantifying the risks of hypertension, age, sex and smoking in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm , 2000, The British journal of surgery.

[13]  RAP Scott,et al.  The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[14]  J. Lindholt,et al.  The validity of ultrasonographic scanning as screening method for abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 1999, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[15]  N. Day,et al.  Incidence among men of asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms: estimates from 500 screen detected cases , 1999, Journal of medical screening.

[16]  R. J. Hayes,et al.  Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. , 1995, JAMA.

[17]  J. Lindholt,et al.  Hospital Based Screening of 65–73 Year Old Men for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in the County of Viborg, Denmark , 1996, Journal of medical screening.

[18]  N. Donnelly,et al.  Initial results of ultrasound screening for aneurysm of the abdominal aorta in Western Australia: relevance for endoluminal treatment of aneurysm disease. , 2001, Cardiovascular surgery.

[19]  H A Ashton,et al.  Influence of screening on the incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: 5‐year results of a randomized controlled study , 1995, The British journal of surgery.

[20]  A R Jadad,et al.  Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? , 1996, Controlled clinical trials.

[21]  S G Thompson,et al.  Probabilities of progression of aortic aneurysms: estimates and implications for screening policy , 2002, Journal of medical screening.

[22]  N. Day,et al.  The long-term benefits of a single scan for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) at age 65. , 2001, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[23]  J. Collin,et al.  Implications of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms on surgical workload , 2005, The British journal of surgery.

[24]  A. R. Brady,et al.  Mortality results for randomised controlled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms , 1998, The Lancet.

[25]  J. Lindholt,et al.  Hospital costs and benefits of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Results from a randomised population screening trial. , 2002, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[26]  J. Lindholt,et al.  Randomized double‐blind controlled trial of roxithromycin for prevention of abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion , 2001, The British journal of surgery.

[27]  Private Costs Associated with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening: The Importance of Private Travel and Time Costs , 1995, Journal of medical screening.

[28]  K. Jamrozik,et al.  The potential for a selective screening strategy for abdominal aortic aneurysm , 2000, Journal of medical screening.

[29]  K. Johnston Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: six-year follow-up results of a multicenter prospective study. Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery Aneurysm Study Group. , 1994, Journal of vascular surgery.

[30]  J. Lindholt,et al.  Cystatin C deficiency is associated with the progression of small abdominal aortic aneurysms , 2001, The British journal of surgery.

[31]  J. Lindholt,et al.  Is screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm acceptable to the population? Selection and recruitment to hospital-based mass screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 1998, Journal of public health medicine.