Signal and Noise Covariance Estimation Based on ICA for High-Resolution Cortical Dipole Imaging

We investigated suitable spatial inverse filters for cortical dipole imaging from the scalp electroencephalogram (EEG). The effects of incorporating statistical information of signal and noise into inverse procedures were examined by computer simulations and experimental studies. The parametric projection filter (PPF) and parametric Wiener filter (PWF) were applied to an inhomogeneous three-sphere volume conductor head model. The noise covariance matrix was estimated by applying independent component analysis (ICA) to scalp potentials. The present simulation results suggest that the PPF and the PWF provided excellent performance when the noise covariance was estimated from the differential noise between EEG and the separated signal using ICA and the signal covariance was estimated from the separated signal. Moreover, the spatial resolution of the cortical dipole imaging was improved while the influence of noise was suppressed by including the differential noise at the instant of the imaging and by adjusting the duration of noise sample according to the signal to noise ratio. We applied the proposed imaging technique to human experimental data of visual evoked potential and obtained reasonable results that coincide to physiological knowledge.

[1]  Bin He,et al.  A computer simulation study of cortical imaging from scalp potentials , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[3]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  On the realization of an analytic high-resolution EEG , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  J. White Neural engineering , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  S. G. Andino,et al.  Distributed Source Models: Standard Solutions and New Developments , 1999 .

[6]  Chris Eliasmith,et al.  Neural Engineering , 2020 .

[7]  Christine Schlichting,et al.  Age-related features of the resting and P300 auditory evoked responses using the dipole localization method and cortical imaging technique , 1990, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[8]  Bin He,et al.  Equivalent Dipole Source Imaging of Brain Electric Activity by Means of Parametric Projection Filter , 2001, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  A. Dale,et al.  Improved Localizadon of Cortical Activity by Combining EEG and MEG with MRI Cortical Surface Reconstruction: A Linear Approach , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  Erkki Oja,et al.  Parametric projection filter for image and signal restoration , 1986, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[11]  Jie Lian,et al.  High-resolution EEG: on the cortical equivalent dipole layer imaging , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  F Babiloni,et al.  High resolution EEG: a new model-dependent spatial deblurring method using a realistically-shaped MR-constructed subject's head model. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  Bin He,et al.  Spatio-temporal cortical source imaging of brain electrical activity by means of time-varying parametric projection filter , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  D. A. Driscoll,et al.  EEG electrode sensitivity--an application of reciprocity. , 1969, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[15]  Rodica Strungaru,et al.  Independent Component Analysis Applied in Biomedical Signal Processing , 2004 .

[16]  A Gevins,et al.  High resolution EEG: 124-channel recording, spatial deblurring and MRI integration methods. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  Truncated Singular Value Decomposition Solutions to Discrete Ill-Posed Problems with Ill-Determined Numerical Rank , 1990, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[18]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[19]  B. He,et al.  Brain electric source imaging: scalp Laplacian mapping and cortical imaging. , 1999, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[20]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Magnetic source images determined by a lead-field analysis: the unique minimum-norm least-squares estimation , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  A. N. Tikhonov,et al.  Solutions of ill-posed problems , 1977 .

[22]  R. Stephenson A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[23]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[24]  B. He,et al.  High-resolution source imaging of brain electrical activity , 1998, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[25]  Bin He,et al.  Cortical Dipole Imaging of Movement-related Potentials by Means of Parametric Inverse Filters Incorporating with Signal and Noise Covariance , 2007, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[26]  K. Sekihara,et al.  Noise covariance incorporated MEG-MUSIC algorithm: a method for multiple-dipole estimation tolerant of the influence of background brain activity , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  MEG-based imaging of focal neuronal current sources , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[28]  K. Sekihara,et al.  Average-intensity reconstruction and Wiener reconstruction of bioelectric current distribution based on its estimated covariance matrix , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  Bin He,et al.  EEG Cortical Potential Imaging of Brain Electrical Activity by means of Parametric Projection Filters , 2003 .

[30]  R. Srebro,et al.  Estimating regional brain activity from evoked potential fields on the scalp , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  W. Drongelen,et al.  Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  P. Nunez,et al.  A theoretical and experimental study of high resolution EEG based on surface Laplacians and cortical imaging. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.