Hydrogen energy storage method selection using fuzzy axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process

Abstract This paper presents an integrated Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (fAHP) and Weighted Fuzzy Axiomatic Design (wfAD) methodology for a strategic level problem of hydrogen energy storage (HES) method selection for Turkey. Considering alternatives of tank, metal hydride and chemical storage, we design our decision problem with respect to five assessment criteria as weight, capacity, storage loss and leak, reliability, and total system cost. In the solution methodology, we first implement fAHP to determine criteria weights by incorporating linguistic judgement and vague information. Next, we define functional requirements and design parameters for the selection problem and use wfAD to compare alternatives. After implementing the proposed integrated approach, we perform additional sensitivity analysis experiments to test the robustness of the solution with respect to changes in functional requirements.

[1]  A. Kaufmann,et al.  Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic : theory and applications , 1986 .

[2]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  Fuzzy Multi-actor Multi-criteria Decision Making for sustainability assessment of biomass-based technologies for hydrogen production , 2013 .

[3]  Erwin Rauch,et al.  Application of Axiomatic Design in Manufacturing System Design: A Literature Review , 2016 .

[4]  Chong Nam Chu,et al.  Axiomatic Design of Automotive Suspension Systems , 2002 .

[5]  Sunil Kumar Singal,et al.  Penstock material selection in small hydropower plants using MADM methods , 2015 .

[6]  Metin Celik,et al.  Fuzzy axiomatic design extension for managing model selection paradigm in decision science , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  M. Fowler,et al.  Benchmarking and selection of Power-to-Gas utilizing electrolytic hydrogen as an energy storage alternative , 2016 .

[8]  António Moniz,et al.  A review of multi-criteria decision making approaches for evaluating energy storage systems for grid applications , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[9]  Mkhulu Mathe,et al.  Current research trends and perspectives on materials-based hydrogen storage solutions: A critical review , 2017 .

[10]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  A review of multi-criteria decision-making applications to solve energy management problems: Two decades from 1995 to 2015 , 2017 .

[11]  António Gonçalves-Coelho,et al.  Axiomatic design as support for decision-making in a design for manufacturing context: A case study , 2007 .

[12]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Application of axiomatic design and TOPSIS methodologies under fuzzy environment for proposing competitive strategies on Turkish container ports in maritime transportation network , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[13]  Amro M. Farid,et al.  Axiomatic Design in Large Systems , 2016 .

[14]  Mumtaz Karatas,et al.  An ILP and simulation model to optimize search and rescue helicopter operations , 2017, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[15]  Konstantinos Salonitis,et al.  Design for additive manufacturing based on the axiomatic design method , 2016, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[16]  Tolga Temucin,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision Making , 2021, Research Anthology on Decision Support Systems and Decision Management in Healthcare, Business, and Engineering.

[17]  Zheng Li,et al.  A multi-objective optimization approach for selection of energy storage systems , 2018, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[18]  P. Seferlis,et al.  Power management strategies for a stand-alone power system using renewable energy sources and hydrogen storage , 2009 .

[19]  Arvind R. Singh,et al.  A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development , 2017 .

[20]  Mumtaz Karatas,et al.  A multi-objective model for locating search and rescue boats , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  D. Chang.  Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP , 1996 .

[22]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  Axiomatic Design of Software Systems , 2000 .

[23]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Evaluating construction projects of hotels based on environmental sustainability with MCDM framework , 2017 .

[24]  İhsan Kaya,et al.  An integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology based on type-2 fuzzy sets for selection among energy alternatives in Turkey , 2015 .

[25]  Luis Ribeiro,et al.  An Axiomatic Design of a Multiagent Reconfigurable Mechatronic System Architecture , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[26]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  principles in design , 1990 .

[27]  R. Tarkowski,et al.  Screening and ranking framework for underground hydrogen storage site selection in Poland , 2018 .

[28]  Ceren Tuncer Sakar,et al.  An MCDM-integrated maximum coverage approach for positioning of military surveillance systems , 2019, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[29]  S. M. Sapuan,et al.  A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection , 2011, Materials & Design.

[30]  Reza Hafezi,et al.  A new hybrid decision framework for prioritizing funding allocation to Iran's energy sector , 2017 .

[31]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Analysis of Success Factors in Aviation 4.0 Using Integrated Intuitionistic Fuzzy MCDM Methods , 2019, Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques in Big Data Analytics and Decision Making.

[32]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach , 2008 .

[33]  R. Todeschini,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making Methods , 2009 .

[34]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  A group decision making support system in logistics and supply chain management , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[35]  Egemen Sulukan,et al.  Energy Management Performance in Country Scale: A Data Envelopment Analysis , 2017 .

[36]  A. Popoola,et al.  Hydrogen energy, economy and storage: Review and recommendation , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[37]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  Design and operation of large systems , 1995 .

[38]  Po-Chien Chang,et al.  Fuzzy Delphi method for evaluating hydrogen production technologies , 2011 .

[39]  Jae-Hyuk Oh,et al.  Axiomatic Design of Machine Control System , 2001 .

[40]  R. Tarkowski,et al.  Underground hydrogen storage: Characteristics and prospects , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[41]  M. Kalubarme,et al.  Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Approach for Mangrove Health Assessment using Geo-informatics Technology , 2018, International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics.

[42]  Mumtaz Karatas,et al.  Assessment of Turkey's energy management performance via a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making methodology , 2018, Energy.

[43]  Patrick T. Hester,et al.  An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods , 2013 .

[44]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Fuzzy Axiomatic Design approach based green supplier selection: A case study from Singapore , 2015 .

[45]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications , 2001 .

[46]  Andreas Züttel,et al.  Hydrogen storage methods , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.

[47]  Hakan Tozan,et al.  A Fuzzy MCDM Framework for Weapon Systems Selection , 2019, Operations Research for Military Organizations.

[48]  C. Kahraman,et al.  Multi-attribute comparison of advanced manufacturing systems using fuzzy vs. crisp axiomatic design approach , 2005 .

[49]  Mumtaz Karatas,et al.  An integrated multi-criteria decision making methodology for health technology assessment , 2018 .

[50]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  A Hybrid MCDM Technique for Risk Management in Construction Projects , 2018, Symmetry.

[51]  Suh Nam-pyo,et al.  Complexity: Theory and Applications , 2005 .

[52]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: The case of Istanbul , 2010 .

[53]  Zenonas Turskis,et al.  Information Security Risk Assessment in Critical Infrastructure: A Hybrid MCDM Approach , 2019, Informatica.

[54]  Morteza Osanloo,et al.  Mine closure risk management: An integration of 3D risk model and MCDM techniques , 2018 .

[55]  Gyunyoung Heo,et al.  An axiomatic design approach in development of nanofluid coolants , 2009 .

[56]  Alev Taskin Gumus,et al.  A Combined Fuzzy-AHP and Fuzzy-GRA Methodology for Hydrogen Energy Storage Method Selection in Turkey , 2013 .

[57]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Multicriteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[58]  Harish Hirani,et al.  Journal bearing design using multiobjective genetic algorithm and axiomatic design approaches , 2005 .

[59]  M. Suha Yazici,et al.  Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Demonstrations in Turkey , 2012 .

[60]  Gyung-Jin Park,et al.  Development of a design system for EPS cushioning package of a monitor using axiomatic design , 2005, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[61]  R. Shankar,et al.  Select the best supply chain by risk analysis for Indian industries environment using MCDM approaches , 2017 .

[62]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[63]  İbrahim Zeki Akyurt,et al.  Hydrogen mobility roll-up site selection using intuitionistic fuzzy sets based WASPAS, COPRAS and EDAS , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[64]  Osman Kulak,et al.  A complete cellular manufacturing system design methodology based on axiomatic design principles , 2005, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[65]  Adrian V. Gheorghe,et al.  Hydrogen underground storage in Romania, potential directions of development, stakeholders and general aspects , 2014 .

[66]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  A Novel Hybrid MCDM Approach for Complicated Supply Chain Management Problems in Construction , 2017 .

[67]  Glin Bykzkan,et al.  Application of a new combined intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM approach based on axiomatic design methodology for the supplier selection problem , 2017 .

[68]  A. H. Pandith,et al.  Hydrogen storage: Materials, methods and perspectives , 2015 .

[69]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  A grey-based group decision-making methodology for the selection of hydrogen technologies in life cycle sustainability perspective , 2012 .

[70]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  A new multi-attribute decision making method: Hierarchical fuzzy axiomatic design , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[71]  A. Özarslan.  Large-scale hydrogen energy storage in salt caverns , 2012 .

[72]  Guangdong Tian,et al.  Green decoration materials selection under interior environment characteristics: A grey-correlation based hybrid MCDM method , 2018 .

[73]  Juan Miguel Sánchez-Lozano,et al.  An Analysis of Decision Criteria for the Selection of Military Training Aircrafts , 2017, Soft Computing Based Optimization and Decision Models.

[74]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Evaluation of energy storage technologies for integration with renewable electricity: Quantifying expert opinions , 2012 .

[75]  Hüseyin Basligil,et al.  A Hybrid Multicriteria Decision Making Methodology Based on Type-2 Fuzzy Sets For Selection Among Energy Storage Alternatives , 2015, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[76]  İbrahim Zeki Akyurt,et al.  An integrated ARAS and interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy sets method for underground site selection: Seasonal hydrogen storage in salt caverns , 2019, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.

[77]  N. Suh.  Ergonomics, axiomatic design and complexity theory , 2007 .

[78]  Rosemarie D C Bernabe,et al.  Decision theory and the evaluation of risks and benefits of clinical trials. , 2012, Drug discovery today.

[79]  C. Kahraman,et al.  Fuzzy multi-attribute selection among transportation companies using axiomatic design and analytic h , 2005 .

[80]  Sin-Jin Lin,et al.  Construction method selection for green building projects to improve environmental sustainability by using an MCDM approach , 2013 .

[81]  Mumtaz Karatas,et al.  Multiattribute Decision Making Using Multiperiod Probabilistic Weighted Fuzzy Axiomatic Design , 2017, Syst. Eng..

[82]  Hakan Tozan,et al.  Multi Criteria Decision Methods in Health Technology Assessment: A Brief Literature Review , 2016 .

[83]  Miguel Cavique,et al.  Axiomatic design and HVAC systems: An efficient design decision-making criterion , 2009 .

[84]  Ruth Jill Urbanic,et al.  Using axiomatic design with the design recovery framework to provide a platform for subsequent design modifications , 2009 .