Mixture of differentially tagged Tol2 transposons accelerates conditional disruption of a broad spectrum of genes in mouse embryonic stem cells

Among the insertional mutagenesis techniques used in the current international knockout mouse project (KOMP) on the inactivation of all mouse genes in embryonic stem (ES) cells, random gene trapping has been playing a major role. Gene-targeting experiments have also been performed to individually and conditionally knockout the remaining ‘difficult-to-trap’ genes. Here, we show that transcriptionally silent genes in ES cells are severely underrepresented among the randomly trapped genes in KOMP. Our conditional poly(A)-trapping vector with a common retroviral backbone also has a strong bias to be integrated into constitutively transcribed genome loci. Most importantly, conditional gene disruption could not be successfully accomplished by using the retrovirus vector because of the frequent development of intra-vector deletions/rearrangements. We found that one of the cut and paste-type DNA transposons, Tol2, can serve as an ideal platform for gene-trap vectors that ensures identification and conditional disruption of a broad spectrum of genes in ES cells. We also solved a long-standing problem associated with multiple vector integration into the genome of a single cell by incorporating a mixture of differentially tagged Tol2 transposons. We believe our strategy indicates a straightforward approach to mass-production of conditionally disrupted alleles for genes in the target cells.

[1]  J. Zuber,et al.  Forward and reverse genetics through derivation of haploid mouse embryonic stem cells. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[2]  Martin Leeb,et al.  Derivation of haploid embryonic stem cells from mouse embryos , 2011, Nature.

[3]  J. Rinn,et al.  NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Nature. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 March 15. , 2022 .

[4]  J. Harrow,et al.  A conditional knockout resource for the genome-wide study of mouse gene function , 2011, Nature.

[5]  S. Ekker,et al.  Gene transfer efficiency and genome-wide integration profiling of Sleeping Beauty, Tol2, and piggyBac transposons in human primary T cells. , 2010, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[6]  K. Kawakami,et al.  A simple and highly efficient transgenesis method in mice with the Tol2 transposon system and cytoplasmic microinjection. , 2010, Genomics.

[7]  Wataru Nakamura,et al.  Development of the circadian oscillator during differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells in vitro , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  J. Boeke,et al.  Transposon-mediated genome manipulation in vertebrates , 2009, Nature Methods.

[9]  Claudia Seisenberger,et al.  Splinkerette PCR for more efficient characterization of gene trap events , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[10]  C. S. Raymond,et al.  High-Efficiency FLP and ΦC31 Site-Specific Recombination in Mammalian Cells , 2007, PloS one.

[11]  Akihiro Urasaki,et al.  Functional Dissection of the Tol2 Transposable Element Identified the Minimal cis-Sequence and a Highly Repetitive Sequence in the Subterminal Region Essential for Transposition , 2006, Genetics.

[12]  Songyan Liu,et al.  The International Gene Trap Consortium Website: a portal to all publicly available gene trap cell lines in mouse , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[13]  S. Mcconnell,et al.  Gene targeting using a promoterless gene trap vector ("targeted trapping") is an efficient method to mutate a large fraction of genes. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  S. Salzberg,et al.  The Transcriptional Landscape of the Mammalian Genome , 2005, Science.

[15]  Claudia Seisenberger,et al.  Genomewide production of multipurpose alleles for the functional analysis of the mouse genome. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  M. Kawaichi,et al.  Suppression of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay permits unbiased gene trapping in mouse embryonic stem cells , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  M. Kotlikoff,et al.  Gene trap and gene inversion methods for conditional gene inactivation in the mouse , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  Christopher P Austin,et al.  The Knockout Mouse Project , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[19]  F. Pedersen,et al.  An RNA secondary structure bias for non-homologous reverse transcriptase-mediated deletions in vivo. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  M. Kawaichi,et al.  Expression profiling with arrays of randomly disrupted genes in mouse embryonic stem cells leads to in vivo functional analysis , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  R. Fukumura,et al.  A sensitive transcriptome analysis method that can detect unknown transcripts. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[22]  Shawn M. Burgess,et al.  Transcription Start Regions in the Human Genome Are Favored Targets for MLV Integration , 2003, Science.

[23]  P. Chambon,et al.  A directional strategy for monitoring Cre-mediated recombination at the cellular level in the mouse , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[24]  W. Stanford,et al.  Gene-trap mutagenesis: past, present and beyond , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[25]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[26]  K. Kawakami,et al.  Identification of a functional transposase of the Tol2 element, an Ac-like element from the Japanese medaka fish, and its transposition in the zebrafish germ lineage. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  T. Kitamura,et al.  Plat-E: an efficient and stable system for transient packaging of retroviruses , 2000, Gene Therapy.

[28]  P. Leder,et al.  RET: a poly A-trap retrovirus vector for reversible disruption and expression monitoring of genes in living cells. , 1999, Nucleic acids research.

[29]  Carlos Cordon-Cardo,et al.  Pten is essential for embryonic development and tumour suppression , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[30]  P. Angrand,et al.  Improved properties of FLP recombinase evolved by cycling mutagenesis , 1998, Nature Biotechnology.

[31]  Christophe Person,et al.  Disruption and sequence identification of 2,000 genes in mouse embryonic stem cells , 1998, Nature.

[32]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  Utility of C57BL/6J × 129/SvJae embryonic stem cells for generating chromosomal deletions: tolerance to γ radiation and microsatellite polymorphism , 1998, Mammalian Genome.

[33]  Y. Bessho,et al.  Transposable element in fish , 1996, Nature.

[34]  D J Porteous,et al.  Splinkerettes--improved vectorettes for greater efficiency in PCR walking. , 1995, Nucleic acids research.

[35]  P. Leder,et al.  Murine FGFR-1 is required for early postimplantation growth and axial organization. , 1994, Genes & development.

[36]  K. Rajewsky,et al.  Independent control of immunoglobulin switch recombination at individual switch regions evidenced through Cre-loxP-mediated gene targeting , 1993, Cell.

[37]  H. Niwa,et al.  An efficient gene-trap method using poly A trap vectors and characterization of gene-trap events. , 1993, Journal of biochemistry.

[38]  Philippe Soriano,et al.  Promoter interactions in retrovirus vectors introduced into fibroblasts and embryonic stem cells , 1991, Journal of virology.

[39]  Andrew P. McMahon,et al.  The Wnt-1 (int-1) proto-oncogene is required for development of a large region of the mouse brain , 1990, Cell.

[40]  M. Breindl,et al.  Transcriptionally active genome regions are preferred targets for retrovirus integration , 1990, Journal of virology.

[41]  T. M. Dmitrieva,et al.  Conservation of the secondary structure elements of the 5'-untranslated region of cardio- and aphthovirus RNAs. , 1989, Nucleic acids research.

[42]  A. Joyner,et al.  Mouse embryonic stem cells and reporter constructs to detect developmentally regulated genes. , 1989, Science.

[43]  A. Bradley,et al.  Genome-wide forward genetic screens in mouse ES cells. , 2010, Methods in enzymology.

[44]  J. Brickman,et al.  A wider context for gene trap mutagenesis. , 2010, Methods in enzymology.

[45]  J. Takeda,et al.  Functional genomics in the mouse using the sleeping beauty transposon system. , 2010, Methods in enzymology.

[46]  J. Brickman,et al.  METHODS IN ENZYMOLOGY, VOL 477: GUIDE TO TECHNIQUES IN MOUSE DEVELOPMENT, PART B: MOUSE MOLECULAR GENETICS, SECOND EDITION , 2010 .

[47]  J. Rossant,et al.  Gene trapping in embryonic stem cells. , 2006, Methods in enzymology.

[48]  Mei Yu,et al.  The Centre for Modeling Human Disease Gene Trap resource , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[49]  C. Branda,et al.  Talking about a revolution: The impact of site-specific recombinases on genetic analyses in mice. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[50]  J. Lindeberg,et al.  Conditional gene targeting. , 2003, Upsala journal of medical sciences.

[51]  M. Negroni,et al.  Mechanisms of retroviral recombination. , 2001, Annual review of genetics.

[52]  B. Hogan,et al.  Manipulating the mouse embryo: A laboratory manual , 1986 .