Parameterization of distributed hydrological models: learning from the experiences of lumped modeling

Abstract The Hydrology Lab (HL) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's National Weather Service (NOAA/NWS), Office of Hydrologic Development (OHD) is currently developing and testing the HL Research Modeling System (HL-RMS). Currently, the system has one snow model (SNOW-17) and two runoff models: the Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting (SAC-SMA) and the Continuous Antecedent Precipitation Index (CONT-API). The NWS lumped CONT-API model is operational in one of the NWS River Forecasting Centers (RFCs), the Middle Atlantic RFC (MARFC) in the United States. This study deals with the derivation of a priori distributed parameters for the CONT-API model. In our strategy, initial distributed parameters based on the calibrated lumped CONT-API parameters of 67 basins in the Susquehanna River Basin are derived. This study shows that the CONT-API model six-hourly calibrated parameters can be used in an one-hourly lumped model with only minor changes in total runoff volume (less than 5%). However, to obtain the timing of simulated hydrographs, appropriate one-hourly unit hydrographs need to be derived. A priori-distributed model parameters were based on relationships between soil properties and calibrated lumped CONT-API parameters. Multiple linear regressions with coefficients of determination ranging from 0.39 to 0.63 were obtained for 10 lumped model parameters. Using these predicted parameters, the lumped model produced simulations having Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency, N eff , statistics ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 for five of the 67 basins. These are commensurate with goodness-of-fit statistics from lumped model calibrations. Furthermore, application of the method in deriving a priori parameters gave a promising result in distributed model simulations.

[1]  Michael Smith,et al.  Hydrology laboratory research modeling system (HL-RMS) of the US national weather service , 2004 .

[2]  H. Fuelberg,et al.  An Examination of Radar and Rain Gauge-Derived Mean Areal Precipitation over Georgia Watersheds , 2001 .

[3]  S. Howarth,et al.  Relationships between dynamic response characteristics and physical descriptors of catchments in England and Wales , 1998 .

[4]  J. Feyen,et al.  Analysis of uncertainties associated with different methods to determine soil hydraulic properties and their propagation in the distributed hydrological MIKE SHE model , 2001 .

[5]  Baxter E. Vieux,et al.  Finite‐Element Modeling of Storm Water Runoff Using GRASS GIS , 1994 .

[6]  C. O. Clark.  Storage and the Unit Hydrograph , 1945 .

[7]  V. Koren,et al.  PAWWMETERIZATION OF HYDROLOGICAL MODEL USING NOAA/AVHRR DATA , 1995, 1995 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS '95. Quantitative Remote Sensing for Science and Applications.

[8]  Richard H. McCuen,et al.  A proposed index for comparing hydrographs , 1975 .

[9]  R. H. Brooks,et al.  Hydraulic properties of porous media , 1963 .

[10]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Predicting the daily streamflow of ungauged catchments in S.E. Australia by regionalising the parameters of a lumped conceptual rainfall-runoff model , 1999 .

[11]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN CATCHMENT ATTRIBUTES AND HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE CHARACTERISTICS IN SMALL AUSTRALIAN MOUNTAIN ASH CATCHMENTS , 1996 .

[12]  Richard H. McCuen,et al.  A guide to hydrologic analysis using SCS methods , 1982 .

[13]  V. Singh,et al.  Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology , 1995 .

[14]  B. Armstrong.  Derivation of initial soil moisture accounting parameters from soil properties for the National Weather Service River Forecast System , 1978 .

[15]  Walter J. Rawls,et al.  Green‐ampt Infiltration Parameters from Soils Data , 1983 .

[16]  Seann Reed,et al.  Deriving flow directions for coarse‐resolution (1–4 km) gridded hydrologic modeling , 2003 .

[17]  Parameterization of hydrological model using NOAA/AVHRR data , 1997 .

[18]  J. Refsgaard.  Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models , 1997 .

[19]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  Evaluating NEXRAD Multisensor Precipitation Estimates for Operational Hydrologic Forecasting , 2000 .

[20]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  Space-time scale sensitivity of the Sacramento model to radar-gage precipitation inputs , 1997 .

[21]  D. Seo,et al.  Overall distributed model intercomparison project results , 2004 .

[22]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  An introduction to the European Hydrological System — Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, “SHE”, 2: Structure of a physically-based, distributed modelling system , 1986 .

[23]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  An introduction to the European Hydrological System — Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, “SHE”, 1: History and philosophy of a physically-based, distributed modelling system , 1986 .

[24]  Eric A. Anderson,et al.  National Weather Service river forecast system: snow accumulation and ablation model , 1973 .

[25]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  The NWS River Forecast System - catchment modeling. , 1995 .

[26]  Alain Dezetter,et al.  Rainfall-runoff modelling and water resources assessment in northwestern Ivory Coast. Tentative extension to ungauged catchments , 1993 .

[27]  M. A. Kohler,et al.  Hydrology for engineers , 1958 .

[28]  Victor Koren,et al.  Comparing Mean Areal Precipitation Estimates from NEXRAD and Rain Gauge Networks , 1999 .