How Co-creation Processes Unfold and Predict Submission Quality in Crowd-based Open Innovation

Advanced communication and collaboration technologies, supported by more bandwidth and more computing power, coupled with a demand for more rapid innovation, are driving firms toward crowd-based open innovation. In crowd-based open innovation, organizations generally invite novel contributions from outside the boundaries of the firm via an online platform that enables a large, diverse network of contributors to participate. Unfortunately, little is known about how to best structure and manage information coming from crowds outside of the firm and only a fraction of these efforts succeed. Failures are common, in part, because the ideas submitted are not novel and well-refined and because firms cannot absorb the ideas proffered (Wallin and von Krogh, 2010). Although a number of studies examine strategies of organizations and, at the micro-level, motivations of crowdworkers, we know little about how work is coordinated within the crowd and how to design systems to support higher levels of innovation among crowdworkers. Our goal in this research is to provide a better understanding of how workers collaborate in a crowd-based open innovation community and how these collaboration patterns affect innovation outcomes. Diversity, supported by collaboration and co-creation among community members has been said to be central to the benefits attributed to open innovation (Chesbrough et al., 2006; Ullrich and Vladova, 2016). We aim to unpack the micro-processes of co-creation and how diversity is leveraged in crowd-based open innovation.

[1]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Step by step: Capturing the dynamics of work team process through relational event sequences , 2018 .

[2]  J. Füller,et al.  Why Co‐Creation Experience Matters? Creative Experience and its Impact on the Quantity and Quality of Creative Contributions , 2011 .

[3]  Christoph Riedl,et al.  Teams vs. Crowds: A Field Test of the Relative Contribution of Incentives, Member Ability, and Emergent Collaboration to Crowd-Based Problem Solving Performance , 2016 .

[4]  V. Bekkers,et al.  A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey , 2014 .

[5]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  When Collections of Creatives Become Creative Collectives: A Field Study of Problem Solving at Work , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[6]  G. Vandervegt Joint Impact of Interdependence and Group Diversity on Innovation , 2003 .

[7]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Team diversity and information use , 2005 .

[8]  Padhraic Smyth,et al.  Hierarchical Models for Relational Event Sequences , 2012, 1207.7306.

[9]  Gergana Vladova,et al.  Weighing the Pros and Cons of Engaging in Open Innovation , 2016 .

[10]  Sandra Slaughter,et al.  Understanding the Motivations, Participation, and Performance of Open Source Software Developers: A Longitudinal Study of the Apache Projects , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Avan R. Jassawalla,et al.  Cultures that support product-innovation processes , 2002 .

[12]  Carter T Butts,et al.  Constructing and Modifying Sequence Statistics for relevent Using informR in 𝖱. , 2015, Journal of statistical software.

[13]  Nicola E. Stokburger-Sauer,et al.  Customer co-creation of travel services: the role of company support and customer satisfaction with the co-creation performance. , 2012 .

[14]  Christoph Riedl,et al.  Learning from Mixed Signals in Online Innovation Communities , 2018, Organ. Sci..

[15]  Ramesh K. Agarwal,et al.  A MODEL OF CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2011 .

[16]  J. West,et al.  Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation , 2013 .

[17]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm , 1996 .

[18]  P. Paulus,et al.  Idea Generation in Groups : A Basis for Creativity in Organizations , 1994 .

[19]  Bo Edvardsson,et al.  Co‐creation in Radical Service Innovation: A Systematic Analysis of Microlevel Processes , 2012 .

[20]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Flash Organizations: Crowdsourcing Complex Work by Structuring Crowds As Organizations , 2017, CHI.

[21]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel , 2003 .

[22]  Martin W. Wallin,et al.  Organizing for Open Innovation:: Focus on the Integration of Knowledge , 2010 .

[23]  Monika C. Schuhmacher,et al.  Identification of Lead User Characteristics Driving the Quality of Service Innovation Ideas , 2012 .

[24]  Spencer H. Harrison,et al.  An Inductive Study of Feedback Interactions over the Course of Creative Projects , 2015 .

[25]  Johann Füller,et al.  Co-Creation in Virtual Worlds: The Design of the User Experience , 2011, MIS Q..

[26]  J. Valacich,et al.  Idea Generation in Computer-Based Groups: A New Ending to an Old Story , 1994 .

[27]  C. Shalley,et al.  The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective , 2003 .

[28]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations , 1976 .

[29]  A. Cropley In Praise of Convergent Thinking , 2006 .

[30]  Linus Dahlander,et al.  Open to suggestions: How organizations elicit suggestions through proactive and reactive attention , 2014 .

[31]  Elizabeth D. Rouse Where You End and I Begin: Understanding Intimate Co-creation , 2020, Academy of Management Review.

[32]  P. Paulus,et al.  The Role of Social Anxiousness in Group Brainstorming , 1995 .

[33]  Victor R. Prybutok,et al.  Connection, trust, and commitment: dimensions of co-creation? , 2011 .

[34]  Daren C. Brabham MOVING THE CROWD AT THREADLESS , 2010 .

[35]  C. O'Reilly Individuals and Information Overload in Organizations: Is More Necessarily Better? , 1980 .

[36]  A. Bonaccorsi,et al.  Why Open Source Software Can Succeed , 2002 .

[37]  Daren C. Brabham Moving the crowd at iStockphoto: The composition of the crowd and motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application , 2008, First Monday.

[38]  U. Lichtenthaler OpenInnovation:rentDebates,andFutureDirections , 2011 .

[39]  Alexander Hars,et al.  Working for Free? Motivations for Participating in Open-Source Projects , 2002, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[40]  L. Fleming,et al.  Collaborative Brokerage, Generative Creativity, and Creative Success , 2007 .

[41]  Victor P. Seidel,et al.  Sustaining the flow of external ideas: : The role of dual social identity across communities and organizations , 2015 .

[42]  Alessandro Lomi,et al.  Modeling Relational Events , 2014 .

[43]  J. Füller,et al.  The dark and the bright side of co-creation: Triggers of member behavior in online innovation communities , 2013 .

[44]  J. West,et al.  Open Innovation: The Next Decade , 2014 .

[45]  L. Weingart,et al.  Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams , 2007 .

[46]  Gilad Ravid,et al.  Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: a theoretical model and empirical exploration , 2004, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[47]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  The future of crowd work , 2013, CSCW.

[48]  Beth A. Bechky Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[49]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Network Exchange Patterns in Online Communities , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[50]  J. Raab,et al.  Powell (1990): Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization , 2018, Schlüsselwerke der Netzwerkforschung.

[51]  Kari Kristinsson,et al.  Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation , 2011 .

[52]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Expert crowdsourcing with flash teams , 2014, UIST.

[53]  Brian A Vander Schee Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business , 2009 .

[54]  Eric Quintane,et al.  Short- and long-term stability in organizational networks: Temporal structures of project teams , 2013, Soc. Networks.

[55]  L. Perlow The Time Famine: Toward a Sociology of Work Time , 1999 .

[56]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Teams vs. Crowds: A Field Test of the Relative Contribution of Incentives, Member Ability, and Emergent Collaboration to Crowd-Based Problem Solving Performance , 2014 .

[57]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Diversity and creativity in work groups: A dynamic perspective on the affective and cognitive processes that link diversity and performance. , 2003 .

[58]  Nicholas Ind,et al.  The meanings of co‐creation , 2013 .

[59]  D. Gann,et al.  How open is innovation , 2010 .

[60]  Carter T. Butts,et al.  4. A Relational Event Framework for Social Action , 2008 .