Reduced volume PCR amplification reactions using the AmpFlSTR Profiler Plus kit.

The forensic community continues to seek improvements in DNA typing methods on aspects such as sensitivity and efficacy. Reducing the volume of the AmpFlSTR Profiler Plus reagents offered greater sensitivity and improved the chance of obtaining useful results for samples with very low quantities of DNA and multiple source samples. On the downside, amplifications initiated with less than 0.4 ng of DNA exhibited a twofold increase in the standard deviation of peak ratios. This research suggested a twofold approach to analyzing samples. For samples with greater than 0.25 ng of DNA, a 25 microL reaction is appropriate. Samples that did not demonstrate quantifiable results, or that have less than 0.25 ng, can be amplified by drying the sample directly in the PCR tube and amplifying in a 5 microL reaction. The analyst can expect at least limited results with as little as 0.03 ng of DNA in the 5 microL reaction.

[1]  Bruce Budowle,et al.  Validation Studies on the Analysis of the HLA DQα Locus Using the Polymerase Chain Reaction , 1991 .

[2]  C. Garrett,et al.  Enhanced analytical sensitivity of a quantitative PCR for CMV using a modified nucleic‐acid extraction procedure , 2000, Journal of clinical laboratory analysis.

[3]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[4]  J. Whitaker,et al.  Analysis and interpretation of mixed forensic stains using DNA STR profiling. , 1998, Forensic science international.

[5]  J Buckleton,et al.  An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[6]  P Gill,et al.  Report of the European Network of Forensic Science Institutes (ENSFI): formulation and testing of principles to evaluate STR multiplexes. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[7]  R Higuchi,et al.  Preferential PCR amplification of alleles: mechanisms and solutions. , 1992, PCR methods and applications.

[8]  N. Oldroyd,et al.  Rapid quantification of DNA samples extracted from buccal scrapes prior to DNA profiling. , 1997, BioTechniques.

[9]  C. Kimpton,et al.  Highly discriminating heptaplex short tandem repeat PCR system for forensic identification. , 1995, BioTechniques.

[10]  P Gill,et al.  A comparison of the characteristics of profiles produced with the AMPFlSTR SGM Plus multiplex system for both standard and low copy number (LCN) STR DNA analysis. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[11]  J. Schumm,et al.  General approach to analysis of polymorphic short tandem repeat loci. , 1996, BioTechniques.

[12]  L. Jin,et al.  Evaluation of 13 short tandem repeat loci for use in personal identification applications. , 1994, American journal of human genetics.

[13]  A. Jeffreys,et al.  Amplification of human minisatellites by the polymerase chain reaction: towards DNA fingerprinting of single cells. , 1988, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  K. Mullis,et al.  Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via a polymerase-catalyzed chain reaction. , 1987, Methods in enzymology.

[15]  R. Reynolds,et al.  Analysis of genetic markers in forensic DNA samples using the polymerase chain reaction. , 1991, Analytical chemistry.

[16]  J. Schumm,et al.  Multiplex sets for the amplification of polymorphic short tandem repeat loci--silver stain and fluorescence detection. , 1996, BioTechniques.

[17]  J Buckleton,et al.  Interpreting simple STR mixtures using allele peak areas. , 1998, Forensic science international.

[18]  C. Caskey,et al.  DNA typing and genetic mapping with trimeric and tetrameric tandem repeats. , 1991, American journal of human genetics.