Throughput and Range Performance Investigation for IEEE 802.11a, 802.11n and 802.11ac Technologies in an On-Campus Heterogeneous Network Environment

This paper presents an analysis and measurement results for an experimental study on throughput, range and efficiency performance of IEEE 802.11a, 802.11n and 802.11ac standards in an indoor environment on a typical University Campus. The investigation considers a number of key system features including PHY layers mainly, Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO), Multi-User Multiple Input Multiple Output (MU-MIMO), Channel Bonding and Short-Guard Interval (SGI) in the heterogeneous wireless network. The experiment is carried out for the IEEE 802.11ac standard along with the legacy protocols 802.11a/n in a heterogeneous environment which is typically deployed on Campus. The results compare the maximum throughput of IEEE 802.11 standard amendments, in terms of theoretical and experimental throughput over TCP and UDP protocols for different set of parameters and features to check their efficiency and range. To achieve this desired goal, different tests are proposed. The result of these tests will help to determine the capability of each protocol and their efficiency in a practical heterogeneous on-campus environment.

[1]  Richard van Nee,et al.  Breaking the Gigabit-per-second barrier with 802.11AC , 2011 .

[2]  Janne Riihijärvi,et al.  Measurement-based study of the performance of IEEE 802.11ac in an indoor environment , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[3]  Jaume Barceló,et al.  On the Performance of Packet Aggregation in IEEE 802.11ac MU-MIMO WLANs , 2012, IEEE Communications Letters.

[4]  David D. Coleman,et al.  CWNA: Certified Wireless Network Administrator Official Study Guide: Exam PW0-105 , 2006 .

[5]  Jean-François Hélard,et al.  SU/MU-MIMO in IEEE 802.11ac: PHY+MAC performance comparison for single antenna stations , 2012, Wireless Telecommunications Symposium 2012.

[6]  Parth H. Pathak,et al.  A first look at 802.11ac in action: Energy efficiency and interference characterization , 2014, 2014 IFIP Networking Conference.

[7]  Weizhi Ma,et al.  Performance test of IEEE 802.11ac wireless devices , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI).

[8]  W. Al-Khateeb,et al.  Scalability and performance analysis of IEEE 802.11a , 2005, Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2005..

[9]  Der-Jiunn Deng,et al.  QoS/QoE Support for H.264/AVC Video Stream in IEEE 802.11ac WLANs , 2017, IEEE Systems Journal.

[10]  Abdo Gaber,et al.  A study of TDOA estimation using Matrix Pencil algorithms and IEEE 802.11ac , 2012, 2012 Ubiquitous Positioning, Indoor Navigation, and Location Based Service (UPINLBS).

[11]  Miguel García-Pineda,et al.  Do Current Domestic Gigabit Wireless Technologies Fulfill User Requirements for Ultra High Definition Videos? , 2017, 2017 13th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC).

[12]  Rung-Shiang Cheng,et al.  Performance evaluation of stream control transport protocol over IEEE 802.11ac networks , 2015, 2015 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW).

[13]  Edward W. Knightly,et al.  IEEE 802.11ac: from channelization to multi-user MIMO , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[14]  Saleem N. Bhatti,et al.  Upgrading 802.11 deployments: A Critical Examination of Performance , 2015, 2015 IEEE 29th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications.

[15]  Piotr Remlein,et al.  OFDM interfering signal rejection from 802.11ac channel , 2012, 2012 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications - (PIMRC).

[16]  Zhuo Chen,et al.  Performance of 802.11n WLAN with transmit antenna selection in measured indoor channels , 2008, 2008 Australian Communications Theory Workshop.