Relationship of molecular and phenotypic divergence with hybrid performance in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)

Predicting hybrid performance from the parental generation could largely enhance the efficiency of hybrid breeding programmes. To determine the relationship of parental distances estimated from phenotypic traits and SSR markers with F1 performance, average heterosis and heterobeltiosis in 44 indigenous and exotic genotypes of Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. and Coss.], were studied. Jaccard’s genetic distances (JD) and Manhattan genetic distances (MD) were taken as criteria to classify the genotypic pairs into four diversity groups, viz. high, intermediate high, intermediate low and low. Seventy crosses representing the four diversity groups each for JD and MD were evaluated. Placement of higher number of significantly better hybrids was in extreme diversity groups created using JD, while, it was higher in intermediate diversity groups generated through MD. Low regression values were observed between JD among genotypic pairs and mean performance (R2 = 0.02), average heterosis (R2 = 0.046) and heterobeltiosis (R2 = 0.15). Similarly, low regression values were observed between MD among genotypic pairs and mean performance (R2 = 0.033), average heterosis (R2 = 0.046) and heterobeltiosis (R2 = 0.009). The slope of linear regression curve, placement of hybrids on the plot and low regression values in all the cases revealed that there is no significant association between genetic distance and hybrid performance. Therefore, desirable genetic diversity, in form of heterotic pools, needs to be identified from indigenous and exotic germplasm for expression of heterosis.

[1]  D. Singh,et al.  Genetic diversity studies in relation to seed yield and its component traits in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern & Coss.) , 2016 .

[2]  A. Melchinger Genetic Diversity and Heterosis , 2015 .

[3]  Kuldeep Singh,et al.  Yield-Enhancing Heterotic QTL Transferred from Wild Species to Cultivated Rice Oryza sativa L , 2014, PloS one.

[4]  K. Prabhu,et al.  Assessment of genetic diversity in Brassica juncea (Brassicaceae) genotypes using phenotypic differences and SSR markers. , 2013, Revista de biologia tropical.

[5]  Priti Gupta,et al.  Heterosis and combining ability analysis for yield and its components in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern & Coss) , 2010 .

[6]  C. Jung,et al.  Heterotic patterns in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): II. Crosses between European winter and Chinese semi-winter lines. , 2009 .

[7]  C. Jung,et al.  Heterotic patterns in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): I. Crosses between spring and Chinese semi-winter lines , 2007, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[8]  Z. Haider,et al.  Heterosis in Indian mustard ( Brassica juncea L. Czern & Cosson) , 2006 .

[9]  H. Becker,et al.  Geographic Pattern of Genetic Diversity Among 43 Ethiopian Mustard(Brassica carinata A. Braun) Accessions as Revealed by RAPD Analysis , 2006, Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution.

[10]  A. Guo,et al.  Genetic distances revealed by morphological characters, isozymes, proteins and RAPD markers and their relationships with hybrid performance in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) , 2005, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[11]  Andreas Girke Neue Genpools aus resynthetisiertem Raps (Brassica napus L.) für die Hybridzüchtung , 2002 .

[12]  A. Riaz,et al.  Genetic diversity of oilseed Brassica napus inbred lines based on sequence‐related amplified polymorphism and its relation to hybrid performance , 2001 .

[13]  D. Struss,et al.  Microsatellite markers for genome analysis in Brassica. I. development in Brassica napus and abundance in Brassicaceae species , 2001, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[14]  C. Sun,et al.  Differentiation and classification of parental lines and favorable genic interactions affecting F1 fertility in distant crosses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) , 1998, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[15]  J. Burstin,et al.  Relationship between phenotypic and marker distances: theoretical and experimental investigations , 1997, Heredity.

[16]  K. Falk,et al.  Performance of inter-cultivar summer turnip rape hybrids in Saskatchewan , 1994 .

[17]  S. Banga,et al.  Potential use of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) technique to study the genetic diversity in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) and its relationship to heterosis , 1994, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[18]  Robert R. Sokal,et al.  A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships , 1958 .

[19]  Naveen P Singh,et al.  Combining ability and heterobeltiosis for yield and yield contributing traits in high quality oil Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) genotypes , 2015 .

[20]  V. K. Dwivedi,et al.  Combining ability and heterobeltiosis for yield and yield-contributing traits in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) , 2012 .

[21]  P. Sharma,et al.  Genetic Diversity Analysis in Indian Mustard [Brassica Juncea (L.) CZERN & COSS] , 2009 .

[22]  Sardar Ali,et al.  ESTIMATION OF HETEROSIS FOR SOME IMPORTANT TRAITS IN MUSTARD (BRASSICA JUNCEA L.) , 2006 .

[23]  S. Tewari,et al.  Genetic divergence for important quantitative traits in indian mustard {Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss}* , 2006 .

[24]  T. Mahmood,et al.  Heterosis for Some Quantitative Characters in Brassica juncea L. , 2003 .

[25]  I. Ali,et al.  Mutant heterosis in oilseed rape. , 2000 .

[26]  B. Diers,et al.  Relationship between heterosis and genetic distance based on restriction fragment length polymorphism markers in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). , 1996 .

[27]  A. Tiwari,et al.  Heterosis and inbreeding depression in Indian mustard , 1991 .

[28]  J. Doyle,et al.  Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue , 1990 .

[29]  M. Lefort-Buson,et al.  Heterosis and genetic distance in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Use of different indicators of genetic divergence in a 7 × 7 diallel , 1986 .

[30]  P. Sneath,et al.  Numerical Taxonomy , 1962, Nature.