Towards an integrated probabilistic analysis of the blackout risk in transmission power systems

In our modern society, the electrical grid has become one of the most critical infrastructures. Even if feedback from the electrical sector is very positive, electricity generation and transmission cannot be considered as totally reliable activities. A residual blackout risk remains, especially as new ways of generating electricity and operating the grid develop. To study the grid reliability, deterministic criteria are usually considered. Probabilistic risk assessment methods have also been developed, but they usually neglect the dependencies between failures and the dynamic evolution of the grid in the course of a transient: yet a blackout is due to cascading failures in the grid. There is a strong coupling between events, since the loss of an element increases the stress on others and, hence, their probability to fail. Our purpose is therefore to develop an integrated probabilistic approach to blackout analysis, capable of handling the dynamic response of the grid to stochastic initiating perturbations and the event sequences they possibly entail. This approach is adapted from dynamic reliability methodologies, by accounting for the different characteristic times and processes of different cascading phases leading to a blackout. This paper focuses on the modeling adopted for the first phase, ruled by thermal transients. The goal is to identify dangerous cascading scenarios (possibly leading to a blackout) and calculate their frequency. A Monte Carlo code derived from this methodology is validated on a test grid. Some dangerous scenarios are presented and their frequency calculated by this method is compared with the classical estimation.

[1]  R. Eaton,et al.  Electrical Breakdown Characteristics and Testing of High Voltage XLPE and EPR Insulated Cables , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[2]  J. Hortal,et al.  Application of the integrated safety assessment methodology to the protection of electric systems , 1996 .

[3]  C. J. McMillen,et al.  Gas Bubble Studies and Impulse Tests on Distribution Transformers During Loading Above Nameplate Rating , 1983, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[4]  D. Fabiani,et al.  Discussion on application of the Weibull distribution to electrical breakdown of insulating materials , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation.

[5]  Pierre-Etienne Labeau,et al.  Transmission Grid Security: A PSA Approach , 2011 .

[6]  Friedrich Kiessling Overhead Power Lines: Planning, Design, Construction , 2003 .

[7]  A. F. Brandão A model for substation reliability analysis including overload effects , 1987 .

[8]  Qiming Chen,et al.  The probability, identification, and prevention of rare events in power systems , 2004 .

[9]  Zhejing Bao,et al.  Analysis of cascading failure in electric grid based on power flow entropy , 2009 .

[10]  B. Pal,et al.  Robust Control in Power Systems , 2005 .

[11]  F. Heinrichs,et al.  Bubble Formation in Power Transformer Windings at Overload Temperatures , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[12]  Dusko P. Nedic,et al.  Simulation Of Large System Disturbances , 2003 .

[13]  V. Vittal,et al.  Risk Assessment for Transformer Loading , 2001, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[14]  Mohammad Shahidehpour,et al.  The IEEE Reliability Test System-1996. A report prepared by the Reliability Test System Task Force of the Application of Probability Methods Subcommittee , 1999 .

[15]  Dorota Kurowicka,et al.  Integration of stochastic generation in power systems , 2006 .

[16]  Liisa Haarla,et al.  A method for analysing the reliability of a transmission grid , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  Éric Zamaï,et al.  Blackouts: Description, Analysis and Classification , 2006 .