A survey of general dental practitioners' approach to the restoration of root-filled teeth.

This paper reports the findings of a survey of a group of general dental practitioners (GDPs) from one region of the United Kingdom. The practitioners were asked to complete a questionnaire investigating their approach to the restoration of root-filled teeth. A high response rate was achieved and the replies indicated that most practitioners restore teeth within 1 month of completing the root filling. Nonprecious cast alloys cores were popular as was amalgam for core build-ups. Most practitioners opted for a post which was two-thirds the length of the root and zinc phosphate was the most popular luting material. Almost one-quarter of respondents believed that a root is strengthened by a post retained restoration and a similar number have never attended a postgraduate meeting on the subject of the restoration of root-filled teeth.

[1]  R. McAndrew,et al.  A radiographic study of post-retained crowns in patients attending a dental hospital , 1993, British Dental Journal.

[2]  E. Swift,et al.  A national survey on the use of glass-ionomer cements. , 1993, Operative dentistry.

[3]  M. Abou-Rass Post and core restoration of endodontically treated teeth. , 1992, Current opinion in dentistry.

[4]  M. Gelfand,et al.  Effect of complete veneer crowns on the compressive strength of endodontically treated posterior teeth. , 1984, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[5]  J. Martinoff,et al.  Clinically significant factors in dowel design. , 1984, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  A E Skidmore,et al.  Twenty years of endodontic success and failure. , 1983, Journal of endodontics.

[7]  D. Assif,et al.  Retention of dowels using a composite resin as a cementing medium. , 1982, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  J. Nicholls,et al.  Pin-retained amalgam cores vs. cast-gold dowel-cores. , 1977, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.