Sponsoring Mobile Data: Analyzing the Impact on Internet Stakeholders

As demand for mobile data increases, end users increasingly need to pay more for consuming data. Sponsored data is a new pricing model that allows content providers (CPs) to subsidize some of this cost. It potentially offers benefits to multiple Internet stakeholders: users can enjoy lower data costs, CPs can attract more users by subsidizing their data access, and Internet service providers (ISPs) can create new revenue streams by charging CPs for sponsored data. However, the distribution of these benefits between different users, CPs, and the ISP remains unclear. Although concerns have been raised that sponsored data disproportionately benefits larger, less cost-sensitive CPs, little attention has been paid to analyzing sponsored data’s impact on end users. This paper does so by first formulating an analytical model of user, CP, and ISP interactions for heterogeneous users and CPs and deriving their optimal behaviors. We then show that while all three parties can benefit from sponsored data, sponsorship benefits users more than CPs. These disproportionate benefits are more pronounced for more cost-sensitive users when they receive sponsorship from less cost-sensitive CPs, indicating that sponsored data may help to bridge the digital divide between users who can afford the cost of mobile data and those who cannot. We then show that sponsorship disproportionately benefits less cost-sensitive CPs and more cost-sensitive users, exacerbating disparities among CPs but reducing disparities among users. We finally illustrate these results through numerical simulations with data from a commercial pricing trial.

[1]  Sangtae Ha,et al.  Sponsoring mobile data: An economic analysis of the impact on users and content providers , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM).

[2]  Sangtae Ha,et al.  The economics of shared data plans , 2012 .

[3]  Sangtae Ha,et al.  A survey of smart data pricing , 2012, ACM Comput. Surv..

[4]  Robert Somogyi,et al.  The Economics of Zero-Rating and Net Neutrality , 2016 .

[5]  Yuedong Xu,et al.  Net Neutrality and Quality of Service , 2011, GAMENETS.

[6]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  How Is the Mobile Internet Different? Search Costs and Local Activities , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Yuan Wu,et al.  Revenue sharing among ISPs in two-sided markets , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[8]  Yue Jin,et al.  A truthful pricing mechanism for sponsored content in wireless networks , 2016, IEEE INFOCOM 2016 - The 35th Annual IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[9]  Sampath Rangarajan,et al.  The economics of quality sponsored data in wireless networks , 2015, 2015 13th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOpt).

[10]  J. Rochet,et al.  Platform competition in two sided markets , 2003 .

[11]  Sangtae Ha,et al.  Incentivizing time-shifting of data: a survey of time-dependent pricing for internet access , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[12]  Dan Wang,et al.  Sponsoring content: Motivation and pitfalls for content service providers , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS).

[13]  M. Keane,et al.  Decision-Making Under Uncertainty: Capturing Dynamic Brand Choice Processes in Turbulent Consumer Goods Markets , 1996 .

[14]  Matthew Andrews,et al.  Implementing sponsored content in wireless data networks , 2013, 2013 51st Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[15]  Ashutosh Sabharwal,et al.  An Axiomatic Theory of Fairness in Network Resource Allocation , 2009, 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[16]  N. Economides,et al.  Network Neutrality on the Internet: A Two-Sided Market Analysis , 2012 .

[17]  A. Robert Calderbank,et al.  Pricing under Constraints in Access Networks: Revenue Maximization and Congestion Management , 2010, 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[18]  Qiong Wang,et al.  Economic models of sponsored content in wireless networks with uncertain demand , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS).

[19]  Eitan Altman,et al.  Application neutrality and a paradox of side payments , 2010, ReARCH '10.

[20]  Carlee Joe-Wong,et al.  Understanding rollover data , 2016, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS).

[21]  M. Chiang,et al.  Smart Data Pricing (SDP): Economic Solutions to Network Congestion , 2013 .

[22]  Asuman Ozdaglar,et al.  Investment in Two Sided Markets and the Net Neutrality Debate , 2010 .

[23]  Vijay Sivaraman,et al.  An economic model for a new broadband ecosystem based on fast and slow lanes , 2016, IEEE Network.

[24]  Xin Wang,et al.  On Optimal Two-Sided Pricing of Congested Networks , 2017, Proc. ACM Meas. Anal. Comput. Syst..

[25]  Sangtae Ha,et al.  Secondary markets for mobile data: Feasibility and benefits of traded data plans , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM).

[26]  Dan Wang,et al.  Sponsored Data Plan , 2015, SIGMETRICS.

[27]  A. Robert Calderbank,et al.  Network Pricing and Rate Allocation with Content Provider Participation , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[28]  Doug Brake Mobile Zero Rating: The Economics and Innovation Behind Free Data , 2016 .