Screening for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma in the Primary Care Setting: An Update for the US Preventive Services Task Force

PURPOSE Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is a leading cause of blindness and vision-related disability. This review examines the effectiveness of screening for and treatment of early POAG in asymptomatic persons. METHODS We identified studies of glaucoma screening and treatment from MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and glaucoma experts. Two reviewers abstracted relevant studies and graded articles according to US Preventive Services Task Force criteria. RESULTS No randomized, controlled trials of population screening for POAG have been reported. Two randomized controlled trials compared the efficacy of treatment to lower intraocular pressure with no treatment for persons who have early primary open-angle glaucoma. In a Swedish trial, treatment reduced progression at 5 years from 62% without treatment to 45% with treatment (absolute risk reduction [ARR] 17%, number needed to treat 5.8, P = .007). In a US trial of patients with early POAG and normal intraocular pressure, progression at 5 years was observed in 39% of those without treatment and 33% of those with treatment (P = .21). The benefit of delaying progression of visual field loss on vision-related function in patients with early POAG is unclear. The principal harm of treatment is loss of visual acuity resulting from an increased risk of cataract formation. CONCLUSIONS Treatment to lower intraocular pressure may delay progression of visual field deficits in some asymptomatic individuals with early POAG. Further studies of population screening are needed to show that early recognition and treatment of glaucoma in asymptomatic patients are effective in improving vision-specific functional outcomes and health-related quality of life.

[1]  M. C. Leske,et al.  Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[2]  E. Higginbotham,et al.  Evaluating a visual field screening test for glaucoma: How the choice of the gold standard affects the validity of the test , 2001, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[3]  W. Feuer,et al.  Visual function and quality of life among patients with glaucoma. , 1997, Archives of ophthalmology.

[4]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Influence of glaucomatous visual field loss on health-related quality of life. , 1997, Archives of ophthalmology.

[5]  Glaucoma-Laser-Trial-Research-Group The Glaucoma Laser Trial (GLT): 6. Treatment group differences in visual field changes. Glaucoma Laser Trial Research Group. , 1995, American journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  E. E. Hartmann,et al.  The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[7]  J Katz,et al.  Rate of progression in open-angle glaucoma estimated from cross-sectional prevalence of visual field damage. , 1996, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  H Goldmann,et al.  Open-angle glaucoma. , 1972, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  David Haber,et al.  Guide to clinical preventive services: a challenge to physician resourcefulness , 1993 .

[10]  A. Sommer,et al.  An evaluation of optic disc and nerve fiber layer examinations in monitoring progression of early glaucoma damage. , 1992, Ophthalmology.

[11]  Rate of Progression in Open-angle Glaucoma Estimated From Cross-sectional Prevalence of Visual Field Damage , 1996 .

[12]  A. Sommer,et al.  Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. , 1991, JAMA.

[13]  H. Quigley,et al.  Models of open-angle glaucoma prevalence and incidence in the United States. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  C. Mulrow,et al.  Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. , 2001, American journal of preventive medicine.

[15]  H. Jampel We should treat fewer patients with elevated intraocular pressure now that we know the results of the ocular hypertension treatment study. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[16]  A. Investigators The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 12. Baseline risk factors for sustained loss of visual field and visual acuity in patients with advanced glaucoma. , 2002, American journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  Douglas R. Anderson,et al.  Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. , 1998, American journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  R. P. Mills,et al.  Interim clinical outcomes in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study comparing initial treatment randomized to medications or surgery. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[19]  J. Katz,et al.  The ocular hypertension treatment study: intraocular pressure lowering prevents the development of glaucoma, but does that mean we should treat before the onset of disease? , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[20]  The Glaucoma Laser Trial (GLT) and glaucoma laser trial follow-up study: 7. Results. Glaucoma Laser Trial Research Group. , 1995, American journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  J Katz,et al.  A population-based evaluation of glaucoma screening: the Baltimore Eye Survey. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[22]  Douglas R. Anderson,et al.  The effectiveness of intraocular pressure reduction in the treatment of normal-tension glaucoma. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. , 1998, American journal of ophthalmology.

[23]  J Katz,et al.  Methodological variations in estimating apparent progressive visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment. , 1999, Archives of ophthalmology.

[24]  A D Mickalide,et al.  U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. , 1986, Pediatric clinics of North America.