The Impact of Seller Expertise and a Refund Guarantee on Auction Outcome: Evidence from an Online Field Experiment of Camera Lens Market

The purpose of this study is to determine if an auction with high seller expertise and a refund guarantee can have a significant impact on consumers’ willing to transact with as well as the actual price premiums received by an online auction business in the context of a thin market. A controlled field experiment was conducted to examine bidders’ behaviors in the four online auction businesses over the course of one year. Fifteen used camera lenses were selected as the product sold in the auctions. The finding suggested that higher seller expertise leads to higher price premiums and higher willingness to participate in the bidding process. And providing a refund guarantee has a positive effect on price premiums, but its effect on willingness to transact is not significant. Finally, contrary to our expectations, results indicates that auctions with no refund guarantee attracted more unique bidders and bids than auctions providing a refund guarantee for the two high seller expertise groups. And bidders adopted entirely different bidding strategies in the two groups.

[1]  M. Zanna,et al.  Attitudes and Attitude Change , 1993 .

[2]  J. Wooders,et al.  Reputation in Auctions: Theory, and Evidence from Ebay , 2006 .

[3]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[4]  C. Avery,et al.  Strategic Jump Bidding in English Auctions , 1998 .

[5]  David E. Kaun,et al.  Marketing Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Screening Processes. , 1974 .

[6]  A. Rao,et al.  No Pain, No Gain: A Critical Review of the Literature on Signaling Unobservable Product Quality , 2000 .

[7]  Ido Millet,et al.  A conceptual research framework for analyzing online auctions in a B2B environment , 2004 .

[8]  Steven Walczak,et al.  Dressing Your Online Auction Business for Success: An Experiment Comparing Two eBay Businesses , 2008, MIS Q..

[9]  D. Hardesty,et al.  Maximizing earnings and price fairness perceptions in online consumer-to-consumer auctions , 2005 .

[10]  Ewald A. Kaluscha,et al.  Empirical research in on-line trust: a review and critical assessment , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  L. Phillips,et al.  The persuasive effect of source credibility: a situational analysis. , 1978, Public opinion quarterly.

[12]  Judy Chuan-Chuan Lin,et al.  Predicting customer behavior in the market-space: a study of Rayport and Sviokla's framework , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[13]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Attitudes and attitude change. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[14]  A. Roth,et al.  Last-Minute Bidding and the Rules for Ending Second-Price Auctions: Evidence from eBay and Amazon Auctions on the Internet , 2002 .

[15]  Charles A. Wilson,et al.  The Nature of Equilibrium in Markets with Adverse Selection , 1980 .

[16]  M. Spence.  Signaling in Retrospect and the Informational Structure of Markets , 2002 .

[17]  Amit Sharma,et al.  The Persuasive Effect of Salesperson Credibility: Conceptual and Empirical Examination , 2013 .

[18]  Kirk R. Karwan,et al.  The Effects of Severity of Failure and Customer Loyalty on Service Recovery Strategies , 2004 .

[19]  Baohong Sun,et al.  Internet Auction Features as Quality Signals. , 2009 .

[20]  Syed Saad Andaleeb,et al.  Factors Influencing Customer Trust in Salespersons in a Developing Country , 1996 .

[21]  C. Ranganathan,et al.  Key dimensions of business-to-consumer web sites , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[22]  David T. Wilson,et al.  An Experimental Analysis of a Salesman's Expert and Referent Bases of Social Power in the Buyer-Seller Dyad , 1976 .

[23]  A. d’Astous,et al.  Effects of retailer post-purchase guarantee policies on consumer perceptions with the moderating influence of financial risk and product complexity , 2008 .

[24]  D. Ariely,et al.  Buying, Bidding, Playing, or Competing? Value Assessment and Decision Dynamics in Online Auctions , 2003 .

[25]  Jae-Hyeon Ahn,et al.  A model for buyer's trust in the e-marketplace , 2005, ICEC '05.

[26]  R. Staelin,et al.  A Model of Perceived Risk and Intended Risk-handling Activity , 1994 .

[27]  Ho Geun Lee,et al.  Do electronic marketplaces lower the price of goods? , 1998, CACM.

[28]  Jianwei Hou,et al.  Market structure and quality uncertainty: a theoretical framework for online auction research , 2010, Electron. Mark..

[29]  R. Goldsmith,et al.  The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility , 2001 .

[30]  Joseph P. Cannon,et al.  An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer–Seller Relationships: , 1997 .

[31]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Evidence of the Effect of Trust Building Technology in Electronic Markets: Price Premiums and Buyer Behavior , 2002, MIS Q..

[32]  M. Dewally,et al.  Reputation, Certification, Warranties, and Information as Remedies for Seller-Buyer Information Asymmetries: Lessons from the On-Line Comic Book Market , 2006 .