Why Anthropomorphic User Interface Feedback can be Effective and Preferred by Users

This paper addresses and resolves an interesting question concerning the reason for anthropomorphic user interface feedback being more effective (in two of three contexts) and preferred by users compared to an equivalent non-anthropomorphic feedback. Firstly the paper will summarise the author’s three internationally published experiments and results. These will show statistically significant results indicating that in two of the three contexts anthropomorphic user interface feedback is more effective and preferred by users. Secondly some of the famous work by Reeves and Nass will be introduced. This basically shows that humans behave in a social manner towards computers through a user interface. Thirdly the reasons for the obtained results by the author are inextricably linked to the work of Reeves and Nass. It can be seen that the performance results and preferences are due to the subconscious social behaviour of humans towards computers through a user interface. The conclusions reported in this paper are of significance to user interface designers as they allow one to design interfaces which match more closely our human characteristics. These in turn would enhance the profits of a software house.

[1]  Pietro Murano,et al.  Anthropomorphic Vs non-anthropomorphic software interface feedback for online factual delivery , 2002, Proceedings on Seventh International Conference on Information Visualization, 2003. IV 2003..

[2]  Pietro Murano.  Mapping human-oriented information to software agents for online systems usage , 2001 .

[3]  Susan Southworth,et al.  Maps: A Visual Survey and Design Guide , 1982 .

[4]  Steven J. Plimpton,et al.  Massively parallel methods for engineering and science problems , 1994, CACM.

[5]  Jacques de Villiers,et al.  New tools for interactive speech and language training: Using animated conversational agents in the classrooms of profoundly deaf children , 1999 .

[6]  Pietro Murano.  A new software agent 'learning' algorithm , 2001 .

[7]  P. Ekman,et al.  Emotion in the Human Face: Guidelines for Research and an Integration of Findings , 1972 .

[8]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  The impact of anthropomorphic interfaces on influence understanding, and credibility , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[9]  Ann Baker.  Ship or Sheep? An Intermediate Pronunciation Course , 2007 .

[10]  Susanne van Mulken,et al.  The impact of animated interface agents: a review of empirical research , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  C.D. Martin,et al.  The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television and New Media Like Real People and Places [Book Review] , 1997, IEEE Spectrum.

[12]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Agents with Faces: The Effects of Personification of Agents , 1996 .

[13]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[14]  Daniel Gilly,et al.  UNIX in a Nutshell , 2006 .

[15]  V. Zue.  Talking with your Computer , 1999 .

[16]  Michael R. Genesereth,et al.  Software agents , 1994, CACM.

[17]  T. Koda,et al.  Agents with faces: the effect of personification , 1996, Proceedings 5th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication. RO-MAN'96 TSUKUBA.

[18]  Penny Ur,et al.  A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory , 1996 .

[19]  Pietro Murano.  Anthropomorphic vs. Non-anthropomorphic Software Interface Feedback for Online Systems Usage , 2002, User Interfaces for All.

[20]  Ann Baker.  Tree or Three?: An Elementary Pronunciation Course , 2006 .

[21]  Rodger Doyle.  Men, Women and College , 1999 .

[22]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Agents that reduce work and information overload , 1994, CACM.

[23]  Ann Baker.  Ship or sheep? : an intermediate pronunciation course / Ann Baker , 1992 .

[24]  B. Schneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface. Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1992 .

[25]  Susan Brennan,et al.  Effects of message style on users' attributions toward agents , 1994, CHI Conference Companion.

[26]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[27]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Computers are social actors , 1994, CHI '94.

[28]  J. Burkholder,et al.  The lurking perils of Pfiesteria. , 1999, Scientific American.

[29]  H. R. J. Grosch,et al.  The Future of Computing , 1958 .

[30]  George N. Lewis,et al.  WHY NATIONAL MISSILE DEFENSE WON'T WORK , 1999 .

[31]  J. Kenworthy.  Teaching English Pronunciation , 1987 .

[32]  Pietro Murano.  Effectiveness of mapping human-oriented information to feedback from a software interface , 2002, ITI 2002. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces (IEEE Cat. No.02EX534).