An analytical test case for snow models

This paper develops general analytical solutions for examples of water movement through snow and compares the derived analytical solutions to numerical simulations from a coupled energy and mass balance model. The intended use of the test cases is to evaluate the impact of different numerical approximations, especially different vertical discretization strategies and different time stepping schemes. The analytical solutions provide both outflow from the snowpack, as well as vertical profiles of temperature and volumetric liquid water content at different times throughout the analysis period. The derived analytical solutions have close correspondence with model simulations in most cases. The most pronounced differences between the numerical simulations and the analytical solutions are for the fresh snow test case, where the numerical simulations predict earlier arrival of snowpack outflow. The analytical solutions provide a useful test case for physically motivated snow models because the solutions can be used to evaluate the coupling of hydrology and thermodynamics as well as the unsaturated flow of water through porous media.

[1]  Sujay V. Kumar,et al.  Benchmarking NLDAS-2 Soil Moisture and Evapotranspiration to Separate Uncertainty Contributions. , 2016, Journal of hydrometeorology.

[2]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Improving the representation of hydrologic processes in Earth System Models , 2015 .

[3]  P. Dirmeyer,et al.  The Plumbing of Land Surface Models: Benchmarking Model Performance , 2015 .

[4]  R. Essery,et al.  Evaluating snow models with varying process representations for hydrological applications , 2015 .

[5]  Dmitri Kavetski,et al.  A unified approach for process‐based hydrologic modeling: 1. Modeling concept , 2015 .

[6]  Dmitri Kavetski,et al.  A unified approach for process‐based hydrologic modeling: 2. Model implementation and case studies , 2015 .

[7]  C. Voss,et al.  Analytical solutions for benchmarking cold regions subsurface water flow and energy transport models: one-dimensional soil thaw with conduction and advection , 2014 .

[8]  M. Lehning,et al.  Solving Richards Equation for snow improves snowpack meltwater runoff estimations in detailed multi-layer snowpack model , 2014 .

[9]  Olaf Kolditz,et al.  Surface‐subsurface model intercomparison: A first set of benchmark results to diagnose integrated hydrology and feedbacks , 2014 .

[10]  Yves Lejeune,et al.  A comparison of 1701 snow models using observations from an alpine site , 2013 .

[11]  Gab Abramowitz,et al.  Towards a public, standardized, diagnostic benchmarking system for land surface models , 2012 .

[12]  E. Martin,et al.  The detailed snowpack scheme Crocus and its implementation in SURFEX v7.2 , 2012 .

[13]  Dmitri Kavetski,et al.  Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling , 2011 .

[14]  Kevin W. Manning,et al.  The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements , 2011 .

[15]  Kevin W. Manning,et al.  The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 2. Evaluation over global river basins , 2011 .

[16]  Dmitri Kavetski,et al.  Numerical troubles in conceptual hydrology: Approximations, absurdities and impact on hypothesis testing , 2011 .

[17]  M. Clark,et al.  Ancient numerical daemons of conceptual hydrological modeling: 2. Impact of time stepping schemes on model analysis and prediction , 2010 .

[18]  Dmitri Kavetski,et al.  Ancient numerical daemons of conceptual hydrological modeling: 1. Fidelity and efficiency of time stepping schemes , 2010 .

[19]  A. Pitman,et al.  Evaluating the Performance of Land Surface Models , 2008 .

[20]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  A process‐based diagnostic approach to model evaluation: Application to the NWS distributed hydrologic model , 2008 .

[21]  K. Oleson,et al.  Use of FLUXNET in the Community Land Model development , 2008 .

[22]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Evaluating model performance and parameter behavior for varying levels of land surface model complexity , 2006 .

[23]  Masaru Mizoguchi,et al.  Water Flow and Heat Transport in Frozen Soil: Numerical Solution and Freeze–Thaw Applications , 2004 .

[24]  P. Bartelt,et al.  A physical SNOWPACK model for the Swiss avalanche warning: Part I: numerical model , 2002 .

[25]  Pierre Etchevers,et al.  An Intercomparison of Three Snow Schemes of Varying Complexity Coupled to the Same Land Surface Model: Local-Scale Evaluation at an Alpine Site , 2001 .

[26]  James B. Domingo,et al.  A spatially distributed energy balance snowmelt model for application in mountain basins , 1999 .

[27]  David G. Tarboton,et al.  Sub-grid parameterization of snow distribution for an energy and mass balance snow cover model , 1999 .

[28]  C. E. Desborough,et al.  Surface energy balance complexity in GCM land surface models , 1999 .

[29]  Mark S. Wigmosta,et al.  A comparison of simplified methods for routing topographically driven subsurface flow , 1999 .

[30]  Aaron Boone,et al.  Issues related to low resolution modeling of soil moisture: experience with the PLACE model , 1996 .

[31]  A. Jakeman,et al.  How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall‐runoff model? , 1993 .

[32]  C. Luce,et al.  Modification of the Kinematic Wave‐Philip Infiltration Overland Flow Model , 1992 .

[33]  R. Jordan.  A One-dimensional temperature model for a snow cover : technical documentation for SNTHERM.89 , 1991 .

[34]  Grant Jordan.  All Out Except Mrs of Step Thatcher? , 1991 .

[35]  M. Celia,et al.  A General Mass-Conservative Numerical Solution for the Unsaturated Flow Equation , 1990 .

[36]  Randall J. Charbeneau,et al.  Kinematic Models for Soil Moisture and Solute Transport , 1984 .

[37]  K. Beven.  On subsurface stormflow: Predictions with simple kinematic theory for saturated and unsaturated flows , 1982 .

[38]  Eric A. Anderson,et al.  The permeability of a melting snow cover , 1982 .

[39]  J. B. Sisson,et al.  Simple Method for Predicting Drainage from Field Plots1 , 1980 .

[40]  S. Colbeck,et al.  An analysis of water flow in dry snow , 1976 .

[41]  Hiromu Shimizu,et al.  Air Permeability of Deposited Snow , 1970 .

[42]  Dmitri Kavetski,et al.  The structure for unifying multiple modeling alternatives (SUMMA), Version 1.0: Technical Description , 2015 .

[43]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Parameterization improvements and functional and structural advances in Version 4 of the Community Land Model , 2011 .

[44]  E. Martin,et al.  The detailed snowpack scheme Crocus and its implementation in SURFEX v 7 . 2 , 2011 .

[45]  S. Colbeck,et al.  A Theory of Water Percolation in Snow , 1972, Journal of Glaciology.

[46]  清水 弘,et al.  Air permeability of deposited snow , 1969 .

[47]  R. H. Brooks,et al.  Hydraulic Properties of Porous Media and Their Relation to Drainage Design , 1964 .