Modifications of the Hurwicz’s decision rule

The Hurwicz’s criterion is one of the classical decision rules applied in decision making under uncertainty as a tool enabling to find an optimal pure strategy both for interval and scenarios uncertainty. The interval uncertainty occurs when the decision maker knows the range of payoffs for each alternative and all values belonging to this interval are theoretically probable (the distribution of payoffs is continuous). The scenarios uncertainty takes place when the result of a decision depends on the state of nature that will finally occur and the number of possible states of nature is known and limited (the distribution of payoffs is discrete). In some specific cases the use of the Hurwicz’s criterion in the scenarios uncertainty may lead to quite illogical and unexpected results. Therefore, the author presents two new procedures combining the Hurwicz’s pessimism-optimism index with the Laplace’s approach and using an additional parameter allowing to set an appropriate width for the ranges of relatively good and bad payoffs related to a given decision. The author demonstrates both methods on the basis of an example concerning the choice of an investment project. The methods described may be used in each decision making process within which each alternative (decision, strategy) is characterized by only one criterion (or one synthetic measure).

[1]  Selected Papers in Statistics and Probability. , 1955 .

[2]  Massimo Marinacci,et al.  Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude , 2004, J. Econ. Theory.

[3]  Leonard J. Savage,et al.  The Foundations of Statistics Reconsidered , 1961 .

[4]  Marcello Basili,et al.  Ambiguity and uncertainty in Ellsberg and Shackle , 2010 .

[5]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[6]  D. Ellsberg,et al.  Risk, ambiguity, and decision , 2001 .

[7]  Meilin Wen,et al.  Fuzzy facility location-allocation problem under the Hurwicz criterion , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Henry E. Kyburg,et al.  Studies in Subjective Probability , 1965 .

[9]  Marcello Basili,et al.  A Rational Decision Rule with Extreme Events , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  Madeleine E Groenewald,et al.  Comparison of decision-making under uncertainty investment strategies with the money market , 2011 .

[11]  Vladik Kreinovich,et al.  On Decision Making under Interval Uncertainty: A New Justification of Hurwicz Optimism-Pessimism Approach and its Use in Group Decision Making , 2009, 2009 39th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic.

[12]  Massimo Marinacci,et al.  Probabilistic Sophistication and Multiple Priors , 2002 .

[13]  Bert De Reyck,et al.  Optimal investment under operational flexibility, risk aversion, and uncertainty , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Karmen Pažek,et al.  DECISION MAKING UNDER CONDITIONS OF UNCERTAINTY IN AGRICULTURE: A CASE STUDY OF OIL CROPS , 2009 .

[15]  Alain Chateauneuf,et al.  Precautionary Principle as a Rule of Choice with Optimism on Windfall Gains and Pessimism on Catastrophic Losses , 2008 .

[16]  Cezary Dominiak,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Aid under Uncertainty , 2006 .

[17]  Jr. Hanna Stair,et al.  Quantitative Analysis for Management , 1982 .

[18]  Abraham Wald,et al.  Statistical Decision Functions , 1951 .