This paper describes an experimental comparison of three variants of a meeting browser. This browser incorporates innovative, multimodal technologies to enable storage and smart retrieval of captured meeting. Over a hundred subjects had to work in a design team in which they had to prepare and carry out a final meeting, while supported by one of the browser variants. In one condition, teams worked without such support. Measures on individual characteristics, the team, the process and outcome of the project, and the usability of the browsers were taken. The results indicate that a multimodal meeting browser can indeed improve meetings. Further analysis of the now available data will provide additional insight into how browsers can contribute to more efficient and satisfactory meetings, improved team performance and higher quality project outcomes.
[1]
Anita H. M. Cremers,et al.
The Project Browser: Supporting Information Access for a Project Team
,
2007,
HCI.
[2]
Mirjam Huis in 't Veld,et al.
Evaluating meeting support tools
,
2008,
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.
[3]
Anton Nijholt,et al.
Augmented Multi-party Interaction with Distance Access (AMIDA)
,
2006
.
[4]
Wilfried Post,et al.
A research environment for meeting behavior
,
2004
.
[5]
S. Rogelberg,et al.
"Not another meeting!" Are meeting time demands related to employee well-being?
,
2006,
The Journal of applied psychology.