Gap Acceptance Based Safety Assessment Of Autonomous Overtaking Function

Safety testing of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and advanced driving functions (ADF) is a challenging task due to the impossibility of performing a sufficient road testing. In order to overcome this limitation, simulations are usually included in testing. In a previous work, the safety of and autonomous overtaking function – proposed as a part of ADAS – has been evaluated with respect to collision rate performance for a particular scenario. Notwithstanding the advantages of that approach, there are also limits, in particular when a reaction from other traffic participants can significantly alter the collision risk, e.g. when an overtaking autonomous vehicle is reached by another vehicle on the overtaking lane during the maneuver. According to when and how this vehicle will brake, the collision risk will strongly change independently from the ADAS reaction. Against this background, instead of modeling the human driver's response to a cut-in maneuver, we suggest using three key variables, namely Time-To-Collision, Time-Headway and inter-vehicle distance, which in some way capture the instantaneous behavior of the vehicle coming from the rear. These variables are then used as an alternative performance assessment metrics for the autonomous overtaking function.

[1]  Dennis A. Guenther,et al.  Analysis of Human Driver Behavior in Highway Cut-in Scenarios , 2017 .

[2]  Luigi del Re,et al.  Risk functions oriented autonomous overtaking , 2017, 2017 11th Asian Control Conference (ASCC).

[3]  Luigi del Re,et al.  Safety Verification Of ADAS By Collision-free Boundary Searching Of A Parameterized Catalog , 2018, 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC).

[4]  Luigi del Re,et al.  Reduced Complexity Safety Testing for ADAS & ADF , 2017 .

[5]  Hesham Rakha,et al.  Characterizing Driver Behavior on Signalized Intersection Approaches at the Onset of a Yellow-Phase Trigger , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[6]  Saravanan Gurupackiam,et al.  Empirical Study of Accepted Gap and Lane Change Duration Within Arterial Traffic under Recurrent and Non-Recurrent Congestion , 2012 .

[7]  Halil Beglerovic,et al.  Model-based safety validation of the automated driving functio highway pilot , 2017 .

[8]  Ben Waterson,et al.  Modeling the Dynamic Cut-In Situation , 2002 .

[9]  Luigi del Re,et al.  On-line Maneuver Identification in Highway Traffic Using Elastic Template Matching , 2018 .

[10]  Limian Wang,et al.  Analysis of Driver Brake Operation In Near-Crash Situation Using Naturalistic Driving Data , 2011 .

[11]  Erwin de Gelder,et al.  Assessment of Automated Driving Systems using real-life scenarios , 2017, 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[12]  Luigi del Re,et al.  Identification of critical cases of ADAS safety by FOT based parameterization of a catalogue , 2017, 2017 11th Asian Control Conference (ASCC).

[13]  Ding Zhao,et al.  Accelerated evaluation of automated vehicles using extracted naturalistic driving data , 2016 .

[14]  Hermann Winner Safe Driving Despite Uncertainties , 2013 .

[15]  Santokh Singh,et al.  Critical Reasons for Crashes Investigated in the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey , 2015 .

[16]  Zuduo Zheng,et al.  Recent developments and research needs in modeling lane changing , 2014 .

[17]  Tomasz Stańczyk,et al.  Driver reaction time to lateral entering pedestrian in a simulated crash traffic situation , 2014 .

[18]  Michel Verhaegen,et al.  Probabilistic validation of advanced driver assistance systems , 2005 .