Meta-Analyses of Cluster Randomization Trials

A commonly cited purpose for conducting a meta-analysis of randomized trials is to increase the statistical power for detecting the effect of an intervention on a specified set of endpoints. At the same time, it also has been noted by several authors that many large-scale cluster randomization trials have not had the power to detect small or even moderate effect sizes. The loss of efficiency associated with cluster randomization relative to individual randomization, and the frequent failure of investigators to take this loss of efficiency into account at the planning stage of a trial, undoubtedly contributes to this problem. In this article, the authors present an approach that may be used to estimate the power of a planned meta-analysis that includes trials that are cluster randomized. Two examples are presented.

[1]  Allan Donner,et al.  Issues in the meta‐analysis of cluster randomized trials , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  Allan Donner,et al.  Some aspects of the design and analysis of cluster randomization trials , 2002 .

[3]  A Donner,et al.  Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of cluster randomization trials , 2001, Statistical methods in medical research.

[4]  L. Hedges,et al.  The power of statistical tests in meta-analysis. , 2001, Psychological methods.

[5]  A. Koch,et al.  Why are Some Meta-Analyses More Credible than Others?* , 2001 .

[6]  M. Mugford,et al.  WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care , 2001, The Lancet.

[7]  M. Mugford,et al.  WHO systematic review of randomised controlled trials of routine antenatal care , 2001, The Lancet.

[8]  D. Heisey,et al.  The Abuse of Power , 2001 .

[9]  J. Hoenig,et al.  Statistical Practice The Abuse of Power: The Pervasive Fallacy of Power Calculations for Data Analysis , 2001 .

[10]  Allan Donner,et al.  Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research , 2001 .

[11]  N. Duan,et al.  Maintaining mammography adherence through telephone counseling in a church-based trial. , 2000, American journal of public health.

[12]  Allan Donner,et al.  Cluster randomization trials , 2000 .

[13]  R. Bauserman,et al.  A meta-analytic examination of assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college samples. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  S. Thompson The merits of matching in community intervention trials: a cautionary tale. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  A Donner,et al.  The merits of matching in community intervention trials: a cautionary tale. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  R. Mcduffie,et al.  Effect of frequency of prenatal care visits on perinatal outcome among low-risk women , 1996 .

[17]  G. Lindmark,et al.  Randomised controlled trial of a reduced-visits programme of antenatal care in Harare, Zimbabwe , 1996, The Lancet.

[18]  M. Fishbein Great expectations, or do we ask too much from community-level interventions? , 1996, American journal of public health.

[19]  R. Mcduffie,et al.  Effect of frequency of prenatal care visits on perinatal outcome among low-risk women. A randomized controlled trial. , 1996, JAMA.

[20]  N. Smeeton,et al.  A randomised controlled trial comparing two schedules of antenatal visits: the antenatal care project , 1996, BMJ.

[21]  P Diehr,et al.  Breaking the matches in a paired t-test for community interventions when the number of pairs is small. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  G. Wolde‐Tsadik,et al.  Alternative prenatal care. Impact of reduced visit frequency, focused visits and continuity of care. , 1995, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[23]  M. Susser The tribulations of trials--intervention in communities. , 1995, American journal of public health.

[24]  R. Martorell,et al.  Vitamin A Supplementation and Child Morbidity and Mortality in Developing Countries , 1994 .

[25]  T D Koepsell,et al.  The effect of matching on the power of randomized community intervention studies. , 1993, Statistics in medicine.

[26]  A. Scott,et al.  A simple method for the analysis of clustered binary data. , 1992, Biometrics.

[27]  M. Gail,et al.  Aspects of statistical design for the Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT). , 1992, Controlled clinical trials.

[28]  R F Woolson,et al.  Sample size for case-control studies using Cochran's statistic. , 1986, Biometrics.

[29]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .