Non-random radial higher-order chromatin arrangements in nuclei of diploid human cells

A quantitative comparison of higher-order chromatin arrangements was performed in human cell types with three-dimensionally (3D) preserved, differently shaped nuclei. These cell types included flat-ellipsoid nuclei of diploid amniotic fluid cells and fibroblasts and spherical nuclei of B and T lymphocytes from peripheral human blood. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) was performed with chromosome paint probes for large (#1–5) and small (#17–20) autosomes, and for the two sex chromosomes. Other probes delineated heterochromatin blocks of numerous larger and smaller human chromosomes. Shape differences correlated with distinct differences in higher order chromatin arrangements: in the spherically shaped lymphocyte nuclei we noted the preferential positioning of the small, gene dense #17, 19 and 20 chromosome territories (CTs) in the 3D nuclear interior – typically without any apparent connection to the nuclear envelope. In contrast, CTs of the gene-poor small chromosomes #18 and Y were apparently attached at the nuclear envelope. CTs of large chromosomes were also preferentially located towards the nuclear periphery. In the ellipsoid nuclei of amniotic fluid cells and fibroblasts, all tested CTs showed attachments to the upper and/or lower part of the nuclear envelope: CTs of small chromosomes, including #18 and Y, were located towards the centre of the nuclear projection (CNP), while the large chromosomes were positioned towards the 2D nuclear rim. In contrast to these highly reproducible radial arrangements, 2D distances measured between heterochromatin blocks of homologous and heterologous CTs were strikingly variable. These results as well as CT painting let us conclude that nuclear functions in the studied cell types may not require reproducible side-by-side arrangements of specific homologous or non-homologous CTs. 3D-modelling of statistical arrangements of 46 human CTs in spherical nuclei was performed under the assumption of a linear correlation between DNA content of each chromosome and its CT volume. In a set of modelled nuclei, we noted the preferential localization of smaller CTs towards the 3D periphery and of larger CTs towards the 3D centre. This distribution is in clear contrast to the experimentally observed distribution in lymphocyte nuclei. We conclude that presently unknown factors (other than topological constraints) may play a decisive role to enforce the different radial arrangements of large and small CTs observed in ellipsoid and spherical human cell nuclei.

[1]  J. Hindley,et al.  Cloning of human satellite III DNA: different components are on different chromosomes. , 1979, Nucleic acids research.

[2]  M. Kirsch‐Volders,et al.  The central localization of the small and early replicating chromosomes in human diploid metaphase figures , 2004, Human Genetics.

[3]  H. G. Schwarzacher.  Chromosomes: in Mitosis and Interphase , 1976 .

[4]  H. Willard,et al.  Genomic organization of alpha satellite DNA on human chromosome 7: evidence for two distinct alphoid domains on a single chromosome , 1987, Molecular and cellular biology.

[5]  James K. M. Brown,et al.  The spatial localization of homologous chromosomes in human fibroblasts at mitosis , 1994, Human Genetics.

[6]  A. Leitch,et al.  Different distributions of homologous chromosomes in adult human Sertoli cells and in lymphocytes signify nuclear differentiation. , 1996, Journal of cell science.

[7]  D. Callahan,et al.  The experimental homologous and heterologous separation distance histograms for the centromeres of chromosomes 7, 11, and 17 in interphase human T-lymphocytes. , 1995, Experimental cell research.

[8]  F. Vogel,et al.  The internal order of the interphase nucleus , 1974, Humangenetik.

[9]  R. Dilão,et al.  Spatial associations of centromeres in the nuclei of hematopoietic cells: evidence for cell-type-specific organizational patterns. , 2000, Blood.

[10]  L. Manuelidis,et al.  Individual interphase chromosome domains revealed by in situ hybridization , 2004, Human Genetics.

[11]  C Cremer,et al.  Distribution of chromosome 18 and X centric heterochromatin in the interphase nucleus of cultured human cells. , 1990, Experimental cell research.

[12]  R. Nagele,et al.  Chromosomes exhibit preferential positioning in nuclei of quiescent human cells. , 1999, Journal of cell science.

[13]  H. Yokota,et al.  Size-dependent positioning of human chromosomes in interphase nuclei. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[14]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[15]  J. Schmidtke,et al.  Characterisation of a human Y chromosome repeated sequence and related sequences in higher primates , 2004, Chromosoma.

[16]  R. Nagele,et al.  Precise Spatial Positioning of Chromosomes During Prometaphase: Evidence for Chromosomal Order , 1995, Science.

[17]  L. Manuelidis.  A view of interphase chromosomes , 1990, Science.

[18]  Juliet A. Ellis,et al.  The spatial organization of human chromosomes within the nuclei of normal and emerin-mutant cells. , 2001, Human molecular genetics.

[19]  D. Comings,et al.  Arrangement of chromatin in the nucleus , 1980, Human Genetics.

[20]  Peter Teague,et al.  Differences in the Localization and Morphology of Chromosomes in the Human Nucleus , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[21]  J. Gray,et al.  Induction of chromosome damage by ultraviolet light and caffeine: correlation of cytogenetic evaluation and flow karyotype. , 2005, Cytometry.

[22]  Huntington F. Willard,et al.  Chromosome-specific subsets of human alpha satellite DNA: Analysis of sequence divergence within and between chromosomal subsets and evidence for an ancestral pentameric repeat , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[23]  M. Kozubek,et al.  Spatial arrangement of genes, centromeres and chromosomes in human blood cell nuclei and its changes during the cell cycle, differentiation and after irradiation , 2004, Chromosome Research.

[24]  W. Bickmore,et al.  Re-modelling of nuclear architecture in quiescent and senescent human fibroblasts , 2000, Current Biology.

[25]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  The localization of chromosome domains in human interphase nuclei. Three‐dimensional distance determinations of fluorescence in situ hybridization signals from confocal laser scanning microscopy , 1993 .

[26]  Andrea L. Nestor,et al.  Evidence for a Relatively Random Array of Human Chromosomes on the Mitotic Ring , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[27]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Arrangements of macro- and microchromosomes in chicken cells , 2004, Chromosome Research.

[28]  K. Zang,et al.  Quantitative studies on the arrangement of human metaphase chromosomes. IX. Arrangement of chromosomes with and without spindle apparatus , 2004, Human Genetics.

[29]  P. Devilee,et al.  Two subsets of human alphoid repetitive DNA show distinct preferential localization in the pericentric regions of chromosomes 13, 18, and 21. , 1986, Cytogenetics and cell genetics.

[30]  J. Roder,et al.  Organization of a repetitive human 1.8 kb KpnI sequence localized in the heterochromatin of chromosome 15 , 2005, Chromosoma.

[31]  R. Eils,et al.  Simulation of the distribution of chromosome targets in cell nuclei under topological constraints , 1995 .

[32]  C. E. Hildebrand,et al.  Human chromosome-specific repetitive DNA sequences: novel markers for genetic analysis , 2004, Chromosoma.

[33]  M. Kirsch‐Volders,et al.  Analysis of chromosome positions in the interphase nucleus of Chinese hamster cells by laser-UV-microirradiation experiments , 2004, Human Genetics.

[34]  Wendy A. Bickmore,et al.  The distribution of CpG islands in mammalian chromosomes , 1994, Nature Genetics.

[35]  D. Ward,et al.  Cell cycle-dependent distribution of telomeres, centromeres, and chromosome-specific subsatellite domains in the interphase nucleus of mouse lymphocytes. , 1993, Experimental cell research.

[36]  D. Ward,et al.  Cell cycle dependent chromosomal movement in pre-mitotic human T-lymphocyte nuclei , 1992, Chromosoma.

[37]  J. S. Heslop-Harrison,et al.  Chromosome arrangements in human fibroblasts at mitosis , 1991, Human Genetics.

[38]  M. Kozubek,et al.  Topography of Genetic Loci in Tissue Samples: Towards New Diagnostic Tool Using Interphase FISH and High-Resolution Image Analysis Techniques , 2000, Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

[39]  T. Cremer,et al.  Epithelial character and morphologic diversity of cell cultures from human amniotic fluids examined by immunofluorescence microscopy and gel electrophoresis of cytoskeletal proteins. , 1983, Differentiation; research in biological diversity.

[40]  Marion Spaeter.  Nichtzufällige Verteilung homologer Chromosomen (Nr. 9 und YY) in Interphasekernen Menschlicher Fibroblasten , 1975, Humangenetik.

[41]  S. O’Brien,et al.  The promise of comparative genomics in mammals. , 1999, Science.

[42]  M. Spaeter.  [Non-random position of homologous chromosomes (no. 9 and YY) in interphase nuclei of human fibroblasts (author's transl)]. , 1975, Humangenetik.

[43]  A. Jauch,et al.  Double in situ hybridization in combination with digital image analysis: a new approach to study interphase chromosome topography. , 1989, Experimental cell research.

[44]  C Cremer,et al.  Role of chromosome territories in the functional compartmentalization of the cell nucleus. , 1993, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[45]  P. Lijnzaad,et al.  A physical map of 30,000 human genes. , 1998, Science.

[46]  F. Vogel,et al.  Position of chromosomes in the human interphase nucleus , 1982, Human Genetics.

[47]  T. Cremer,et al.  Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[48]  A. Leitch,et al.  Higher Levels of Organization in the Interphase Nucleus of Cycling and Differentiated Cells , 2000, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[49]  T. Cremer,et al.  Sex chromosome positions in human interphase nuclei as studied by in situ hybridization with chromosome specific DNA probes , 1984, Human Genetics.

[50]  Donald Ervin Knuth,et al.  The Art of Computer Programming , 1968 .

[51]  T. Cremer,et al.  Removal of repetitive sequences from FISH probes using PCR-assisted affinity chromatography , 1997, Human Genetics.

[52]  K. Schütze,et al.  Laser microdissection and laser pressure catapulting for the generation of chromosome-specific paint probes. , 1999, BioTechniques.

[53]  P. Devilee,et al.  Detection of chromosome aberrations in the human interphase nucleus by visualization of specific target DNAs with radioactive and non-radioactive in situ hybridization techniques: diagnosis of trisomy 18 with probe L1.84 , 2004, Human Genetics.

[54]  Comings De.  The rationale for an ordered arrangement of chromatin in the interphase nucleus. , 1968 .

[55]  H. Willard,et al.  Detection of restriction fragment length polymorphisms at the centromeres of human chromosomes by using chromosome-specific alpha satellite DNA probes: implications for development of centromere-based genetic linkage maps. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  T. Cremer,et al.  Correlation between interphase and metaphase chromosome arrangements as studied by laser-uv-microbeam experiments , 1984 .

[57]  C Cremer,et al.  Chromosome territories, interchromatin domain compartment, and nuclear matrix: an integrated view of the functional nuclear architecture. , 2000, Critical reviews in eukaryotic gene expression.

[58]  I. Dunham,et al.  Rapid generation of chromosome-specific alphoid DNA probes using the polymerase chain reaction , 2004, Human Genetics.

[59]  C Cremer,et al.  Unscheduled DNA synthesis after partial UV irradiation of the cell nucleus. Distribution in interphase and metaphase. , 1979, Experimental cell research.

[60]  N E Morton,et al.  Parameters of the human genome. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  T. Cremer,et al.  Laser UV microirradiation of interphase nuclei and post-treatment with caffeine , 1976, Human Genetics.

[62]  R. Nagele,et al.  Chromosome spatial order in human cells: evidence for early origin and faithful propagation , 1998, Chromosoma.

[63]  J. V. Moran,et al.  Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. , 2001, Nature.

[64]  J. Langowski,et al.  Translocation Frequencies for X and Y Chromosomes Predicted by Computer Simulations of Nuclear Structure , 2002 .

[65]  H. Ropers,et al.  Isolation and characterization of alphoid DNA sequences specific for the pericentric regions of chromosomes 4, 5, 9, and 19. , 1988, Cytogenetics and cell genetics.

[66]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Nuclear Organization of Mammalian Genomes , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[67]  M. Nikiforova,et al.  Proximity of chromosomal loci that participate in radiation-induced rearrangements in human cells. , 2000, Science.

[68]  T. Cremer,et al.  A complete set of repeat-depleted, PCR-amplifiable, human chromosome-specific painting probes , 1999, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[69]  M. Bobrow,et al.  Technique for Identifying Y Chromosomes in Human Interphase Nuclei , 1970, Nature.

[70]  T. Cremer,et al.  Specific staining of human chromosomes in Chinese hamster x man hybrid cell lines demonstrates interphase chromosome territories , 2004, Human Genetics.

[71]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Erratum: Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome: International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium (Nature (2001) 409 (860-921)) , 2001 .

[72]  T. Cremer,et al.  FISH on three-dimensionally preserved nuclei , 2002 .