Zooming in on the human-mouse comparative map: genome conservation re-examined on a high-resolution scale.

Over the past decade, conservation of genetic linkage groups has been shown in mammals and used to great advantage, fueling significant exchanges of gene mapping and functional information especially between the genomes of humans and mice. As human physical maps increase in resolution from chromosome bands to nucleotide sequence, comparative alignments of mouse and human regions have revealed striking similarities and surprising differences between the genomes of these two best-mapped mammalian species. Whereas, at present, very few mouse and human regions have been compared on the physical level, existing studies provide intriguing insights to genome evolution, including the observation of recent duplications and deletions of genes that may play significant roles in defining some of the biological differences between the two species. Although high-resolution conserved marker-based maps are currently available only for human and mouse, a variety of new methods and resources are speeding the development of comparative maps of additional organisms. These advances mark the first step toward establishment of the human genome as a reference map for vertebrate species, providing evolutionary and functional annotation to human sequence and vast new resources for genetic analysis of a variety of commercially, medically, and ecologically important animal models.

[1]  L. Ashworth,et al.  Tandem zinc-finger gene families in mammals: insights and unanswered questions. , 1998, DNA sequence : the journal of DNA sequencing and mapping.

[2]  G. Rappold,et al.  Man to mouse--lessons learned from the distal end of the human X chromosome. , 1997, Genome research.

[3]  Y. Chagnon,et al.  Identification of an obesity quantitative trait locus on mouse chromosome 2 and evidence of linkage to body fat and insulin on the human homologous region 20q. , 1997, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[4]  T. P. Smith,et al.  Mutations in myostatin (GDF8) in double-muscled Belgian Blue and Piedmontese cattle. , 1997, Genome research.

[5]  Michel Georges,et al.  A deletion in the bovine myostatin gene causes the double–muscled phenotype in cattle , 1997, Nature Genetics.

[6]  J. Ellison,et al.  PHOG, a candidate gene for involvement in the short stature of Turner syndrome. , 1997, Human molecular genetics.

[7]  S. O’Rahilly,et al.  Congenital leptin deficiency is associated with severe early-onset obesity in humans , 1997, Nature.

[8]  L. Ashworth,et al.  The human homolog of a mouse-imprinted gene, Peg3, maps to a zinc finger gene-rich region of human chromosome 19q13.4. , 1997, Genome research.

[9]  A. Rosenthal,et al.  Pseudoautosomal deletions encompassing a novel homeobox gene cause growth failure in idiopathic short stature and Turner syndrome , 1997, Nature Genetics.

[10]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Large-scale comparative sequence analysis of the human and murine Bruton's tyrosine kinase loci reveals conserved regulatory domains. , 1997, Genome research.

[11]  D. Watkins-Chow,et al.  Genetic mapping of 21 genes on mouse chromosome 11 reveals disruptions in linkage conservation with human chromosome 5. , 1997, Genomics.

[12]  H. Kehrer-Sawatzki,et al.  The second case of a t(17;22) in a family with neurofibromatosis type 1: sequence analysis of the breakpoint regions , 1997, Human Genetics.

[13]  T. F. Laughlin,et al.  Comparative anchor tagged sequences (CATS) for integrative mapping of mammalian genomes , 1997, Nature Genetics.

[14]  D. Largaespada,et al.  Mouse models of human disease. Part II: recent progress and future directions. , 1997, Genes & development.

[15]  A. Schinzel,et al.  Unequal interchromosomal rearrangements may result in elastin gene deletions causing the Williams-Beuren syndrome. , 1996, Human molecular genetics.

[16]  E. Bakker,et al.  Evidence for subtelomeric exchange of 3.3 kb tandemly repeated units between chromosomes 4q35 and 10q26: implications for genetic counselling and etiology of FSHD1. , 1996, Human molecular genetics.

[17]  K. Lange,et al.  Selected locus and multiple panel models for radiation hybrid mapping. , 1996, American journal of human genetics.

[18]  L. Ashworth,et al.  Detailed comparative map of human chromosome 19q and related regions of the mouse genome. , 1996, Genomics.

[19]  C. Disteche,et al.  A new region of conservation is defined between human and mouse X chromosomes. , 1996, Genomics.

[20]  A V Carrano,et al.  Sequence analysis of the ERCC2 gene regions in human, mouse, and hamster reveals three linked genes. , 1996, Genomics.

[21]  J. W. Foster,et al.  Construction of a mouse whole-genome radiation hybrid panel and application to MMU11. , 1996, Genomics.

[22]  E. van den Berg,et al.  Fine mapping of the 1q21 breakpoint of the papillary renal cell carcinoma-associated (X;1) translocation , 1996, Human Genetics.

[23]  M. Seldin,et al.  Human/mouse homology relationships. , 1996, Genomics.

[24]  E. Salido,et al.  High frequency de novo alterations in the long–range genomic structure of the mouse pseudoautosomal region , 1996, Nature Genetics.

[25]  G. Gyapay,et al.  A radiation hybrid map of the human genome. , 1996, Human molecular genetics.

[26]  J. Graves,et al.  BREAK THE RULES : Genetics of Marsupials and Monotremes , 2005 .

[27]  J. Eppig,et al.  Comparative maps: the mammalian jigsaw puzzle. , 1995, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[28]  J. Wienberg,et al.  Chromosome painting in mammals as an approach to comparative genomics. , 1995, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[29]  Tom Slezak,et al.  An integrated metric physical map of human chromosome 19 , 1995, Nature Genetics.

[30]  J. Ellison,et al.  Characterization of a YAC contig spanning the pseudoautosomal region. , 1995, Genomics.

[31]  K Lange,et al.  Experimental design and error detection for polyploid radiation hybrid mapping. , 1995, Genome research.

[32]  A. Ashworth,et al.  A contravention of Ohno's law in mice , 1995, Nature Genetics.

[33]  A. Monaco,et al.  High-resolution comparative mapping of the proximal region of the mouse X chromosome. , 1995, Genomics.

[34]  N. Copeland,et al.  Localization of new genes and markers to the distal part of the human major histocompatibility complex (MHC) region and comparison with the mouse: new insights into the evolution of mammalian genomes. , 1995, Genomics.

[35]  A. Carrano,et al.  Genomic sequence comparison of the human and mouse XRCC1 DNA repair gene regions. , 1995, Genomics.

[36]  S. Povey,et al.  Comparative mapping of 50 human chromosome 9 loci in the laboratory mouse. , 1995, Genomics.

[37]  B. Rudy,et al.  Clustering of six human 11p15 gene homologs within a 500-kb interval of proximal mouse chromosome 7. , 1994, Genomics.

[38]  T. Rabbitts,et al.  Chromosomal translocations in human cancer , 1994, Nature.

[39]  L. Hood,et al.  The human T-cell receptor TCRAC/TCRDC (C alpha/C delta) region: organization, sequence, and evolution of 97.6 kb of DNA. , 1994, Genomics.

[40]  S. Laval,et al.  New insights into the man-mouse comparative map of the X chromosome. , 1994, Genomics.

[41]  W. Bickmore,et al.  The human serum amyloid A protein (SAA) superfamily gene cluster: mapping to chromosome 11p15.1 by physical and genetic linkage analysis. , 1994, Genomics.

[42]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Comparative chromosome painting discloses homologous segments in distantly related mammals , 1994, Nature Genetics.

[43]  E. Lander,et al.  A genetic linkage map of the mouse: current applications and future prospects. , 1993, Science.

[44]  H. Willard,et al.  Pulsed-field map of Xq13 in the region of the human X inactivation center. , 1993, Genomics.

[45]  D. Schlessinger,et al.  Report of the Fifth International Workshop on Human X Chromosome Mapping 1994 (Part 1 of 4) , 1993 .

[46]  S. Rastan,et al.  Physical mapping of 2000 kb of the mouse X chromosome in the vicinity of the Xist locus. , 1993, Genomics.

[47]  K. Buetow,et al.  Universal mapping probes and the origin of human chromosome 3. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  L. Hood,et al.  Human and mouse T-cell-receptor loci: the importance of comparative large-scale DNA sequence analyses. , 1993, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[49]  G. Evans,et al.  Isolation and expression of linked zinc finger gene clusters on human chromosome 11q. , 1992, Genomics.

[50]  J. Breslow,et al.  Characterization of the mouse apolipoprotein Apoa-1/Apoc-3 gene locus: genomic, mRNA, and protein sequences with comparisons to other species. , 1992, Genomics.

[51]  M. Seldin,et al.  Construction of a physical map on mouse and human chromosome 1: comparison of 13 Mb of mouse and 11 Mb of human DNA. , 1992, Human molecular genetics.

[52]  L. Hood,et al.  Organization, structure, and function of 95 kb of DNA spanning the murine T-cell receptor CαCδ region , 1992 .

[53]  A. Kulozik,et al.  A deletion/inversion rearrangement of the beta-globin gene cluster in a Turkish family with delta beta zero-thalassemia intermedia. , 1992, Blood.

[54]  D. Duboule,et al.  Comparison of mouse and human HOX‐4 complexes defines conserved sequences involved in the regulation of Hox‐4.4. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[55]  Daniel F. Schorderet,et al.  The human pseudoautosomal GM–CSF receptor α subunit gene is autosomal in mouse , 1992, Nature Genetics.

[56]  J. Mattick,et al.  The conservation of dinucleotide microsatellites among mammalian genomes allows the use of heterologous PCR primer pairs in closely related species. , 1991, Genomics.

[57]  M. Caron,et al.  Genomic organization of adrenergic and serotonin receptors in the mouse: linkage mapping of sequence-related genes provides a method for examining mammalian chromosome evolution. , 1991, Genomics.

[58]  A. Ashworth,et al.  X-chromosome inactivation may explain the difference in viability of XO humans and mice , 1991, Nature.

[59]  D. Stoppa-Lyonnet,et al.  Clusters of intragenic Alu repeats predispose the human C1 inhibitor locus to deleterious rearrangements. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  Eric O Long,et al.  Mapping of the class II region of the human major histocompatibility complex by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis , 1986, Nature.

[61]  Ryszard S. Romaniuk,et al.  Tracts of high or low sequence divergence in the mouse major histocompatibility complex. , 1984, The EMBO journal.

[62]  R. Flavell,et al.  Organization and evolution of the class I gene family in the major histocompatibility complex of the C57BL/10 mouse , 1984, Nature.

[63]  J. Haldane THE COMPARATIVE GENETICS OF COLOUR IN RODENTS AND CARNIVORA , 1927 .