Uncovering Strengths and Weaknesses of Radial Visualizations---an Empirical Approach

Radial visualizations play an important role in the information visualization community. But the decision to choose a radial coordinate system is rather based on intuition than on scientific foundations. The empirical approach presented in this paper aims at uncovering strengths and weaknesses of radial visualizations by comparing them to equivalent ones in Cartesian coordinate systems. We identified memorizing positions of visual elements as a generic task when working with visualizations. A first study with 674 participants provides a broad data spectrum for exploring differences between the two visualization types. A second, complementing study with fewer participants focuses on further questions raised by the first study. Our findings document that Cartesian visualizations tend to outperform their radial counterparts especially with respect to answer times. Nonetheless, radial visualization seem to be more appropriate for focusing on a particular data dimension.

[1]  Z. Eviatar Reading Direction and Attention - Effects on Lateralized Ignoring , 1995, Brain and Cognition.

[2]  Michael Burch,et al.  Timeline trees: visualizing sequences of transactions in information hierarchies , 2008, AVI '08.

[3]  Hongbin Wang,et al.  Object location memory: The interplay of multiple representations , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Michael Burch,et al.  TimeRadarTrees: Visualizing Dynamic Compound Digraphs , 2008, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[5]  Colin Ware,et al.  Visual Thinking for Design , 2008 .

[6]  Georges G. Grinstein,et al.  DNA visual and analytic data mining , 1997, Proceedings. Visualization '97 (Cat. No. 97CB36155).

[7]  Richard F. Riesenfeld,et al.  A Survey of Radial Methods for Information Visualization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[8]  Michael Burch,et al.  Cartesian vs. Radial - A Comparative Evaluation of Two Visualization Tools , 2008, ISVC.

[9]  Mats Lind,et al.  2D vs 3D, implications on spatial memory , 2001, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2001. INFOVIS 2001..

[10]  Andy Cockburn,et al.  Revisiting 2D vs 3D Implications on Spatial Memory , 2004, AUIC.

[11]  Robert McGill,et al.  An Experiment in Graphical Perception , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[12]  Ellen Peters,et al.  Graph Comprehension: An Experiment in Displaying Data as Bar Charts, Pie Charts and Tables With and Without the Gratuitous 3rd Dimension , 2008 .

[13]  Christopher M. Schlick,et al.  The Effect of Structure on Object-Location Memory , 2004 .

[14]  Keith Andrews,et al.  A Comparative Study of Four Hierarchy Browsers using the Hierarchical Visualisation Testing Environment (HVTE) , 2007, 2007 11th International Conference Information Visualization (IV '07).

[15]  Alfred Kobsa User Experiments with Tree Visualization Systems , 2004, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization.

[16]  John T. Stasko,et al.  An evaluation of space-filling information visualizations for depicting hierarchical structures , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[17]  F. Nightingale,et al.  Florence Nightingale : measuring hospital care outcomes : excerpts from the books Notes on matters affecting the health, efficiency, and hospital administration of the British Army founded chiefly on the experience of the late war and Notes on hospitals , 1999 .

[18]  William Playfair,et al.  The statistical breviary : shewing, on a principle entirely new, the resources of every state and kingdom in Europe : illustrated with stained copper-plate charts, representing the physical powers of each distinct nation with ease and prespicuity , 2022 .