Coordination in Consultant-Assisted IS Projects: An Agency Theory Perspective

Increasingly, consulting firms are employed by client organizations to participate in the implementation of enterprise systems projects. Such consultant-assisted information systems projects differ from internal and outsourced IS projects in two important respects. First, the joint project team consists of members from client and consulting organizations that may have conflicting goals and incompatible work practices. Second, close collaboration between the client and consulting organizations is required throughout the course of the project. Consequently, coordination is more complex for consultant-assisted projects and is critical for project success. Drawing from coordination and agency theories and the trust literature, we developed a research model to investigate how interorganizational coordination could help build relationships based on trust and goal congruence and achieve higher project performance. Hypotheses derived from the model were tested using data collected from 324 projects. The results provide strong support for the model. Interorganizational coordination was found to have the largest overall significant effect on performance. However, its effect was achieved indirectly by building trust and goal congruence and by reducing technical and requirements uncertainty. The positive effects of trust and goal congruence on project performance demonstrate the importance of managing the client-consultant relationship in such projects. Project uncertainty, including both technical and requirements uncertainty, was found to negatively affect goal congruence and trust, as expected. This study represents a step toward the development of a new theory on the role of interorganizational coordination.

[1]  R. Casadesus-Masanell Trust in Agency , 2004 .

[2]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[3]  Jeffrey K. Pinto,et al.  Critical Success Factors in Effective Project Implementation , 2008 .

[4]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  A Contingency Approach to Software Project Coordination , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  L. Donaldson The Ethereal Hand: Organizational Economics and Management Theory , 1990 .

[6]  Edward C. Tomlinson,et al.  Models of Interpersonal Trust Development: Theoretical Approaches, Empirical Evidence, and Future Directions , 2006 .

[7]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effectsof Interorganizational and Interpersonaltrust on Performance , 1998 .

[8]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The outsourcing of information services: transforming the nature of business in the information industry , 1995, J. Inf. Technol..

[9]  S. Webber Blending Service Provider-Client Project Teams to Achieve Client Trust: Implications for Project Team Trust, Cohesion, and Performance , 2008 .

[10]  R. Hirschheim Information Systems Outsourcing , 2002 .

[11]  L. Hosmer TRUST: THE CONNECTING LINK BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL THEORY AND PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS , 1995 .

[12]  Francis T. Hartman,et al.  Construction contracts: the cost of mistrust , 2003 .

[13]  P Shekpuiwong Trust in construction partnering: views from parties of the partnering dance , 2004 .

[14]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships , 1996 .

[15]  Jonathon N. Cummings Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[16]  Henry L. Tosi,et al.  Disaggregating The Agency Contract: The Effects Of Monitoring, Incentive Alignment, And Term In Office On Agent Decision Making , 1997 .

[17]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Packaged software development teams: what makes them different? , 1998, Inf. Technol. People.

[19]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  A market-based perspective on information systems development , 2001, CACM.

[20]  R. Bachmann,et al.  The Coordination of Relations Across Organizational Boundaries , 2003 .

[21]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations , 1976 .

[22]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  The interdisciplinary study of coordination , 1994, CSUR.

[23]  Kumar Neeraj Jha,et al.  Commitment, coordination, competence and the iron triangle , 2007 .

[24]  Robert D. Austin,et al.  The Effects of Time Pressure on Quality in Software Development: An Agency Model , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  T. Das,et al.  The Risk-Based View of Trust: A Conceptual Framework , 2004 .

[26]  Michele Williams In Whom we Trust: Group Membership as an Affective Context for Trust Development , 2001 .

[27]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[28]  Guy G. Gable,et al.  A multidimensional model of client success when engaging external consultants , 1996 .

[29]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  The evolution of coordination in outsourced software development projects: a comparison of client and vendor perspectives , 2003, Inf. Organ..

[30]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  K. Eisenhardt Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[32]  L. Sproull,et al.  Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams , 2000 .

[33]  J. C. Henderson,et al.  Technology-process fit: perspectives on achieving prototyping effectiveness , 1990, Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[34]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[35]  Russell L. Purvis,et al.  Controlling Information Systems Development Projects: The View from the Client , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[36]  Sherwin Rosen,et al.  Contracts and the Market for Executives , 1990 .

[37]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Managing the Next Wave of Enterprise Systems: Leveraging Lessons from ERP , 2003, MIS Q. Executive.

[38]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  Information systems project management: an agency theory interpretation , 2003, J. Syst. Softw..

[39]  Kumar Neeraj Jha,et al.  Critical determinants of project coordination , 2006 .

[40]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[41]  Walfried M. Lassar,et al.  STRATEGY AND CONTROL 1IN SUPPLER DISTRIBUTOR RELATIONSHIPS, AN AGENCY PERSPECTIVIE , 1996 .

[42]  Daniel J. McAllister Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[43]  L. M Farrell,et al.  Principal-agency risk in project finance , 2003 .

[44]  A. Kadefors Trust in project relationships-inside the black box , 2004 .

[45]  R. Gulati Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances , 1995 .

[46]  Thomas A. Kochan,et al.  Interorganizational Relationships: Patterns and Motivations. , 1977 .

[47]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  One Size Does Not Fit All Projects: Exploring Classical Contingency Domains , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[48]  D. Gefen,et al.  Nurturing clients’ trust to encourage engagement success during the customization of ERP systems , 2002 .

[49]  Francis T. Hartman Ten Commandments of Better Contracting: A Practical Guide to Adding Value to an Enterprise Through More Effective Smart Contracting , 2003 .

[50]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  What Happens After ERP Implementation: Understanding the Impact of Interdependence and Differentiation on Plant-Level Outcomes , 2005, MIS Q..

[51]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Toward an Assessment of Software Development Risk , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[52]  Michael Doane SAP Blue Book, A Concise Business Guide to the World of SAP , 1998 .

[53]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  The Grammars of Trust: A Model and General Implications , 1998 .

[54]  Tony Moynihan,et al.  Coping with client-based 'people-problems': the theories-of-action of experienced IS/software project managers , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[55]  N. L. Chervany,et al.  Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships , 1998 .

[56]  Sandy D. Jap Pie-Expansion Efforts: Collaboration Processes in Buyer–Supplier Relationships , 1999 .

[57]  James J. Jiang,et al.  Mediators between coordination and IS project performance , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[58]  Jehoshua Eliashberg,et al.  Multiple Business Goals Sets as Determinants of Marketing Channel Conflict: An Empirical Study , 1984 .

[59]  William J. Doll,et al.  The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1988, MIS Q..

[60]  Steven Sawyer,et al.  Packaged software: implications of the differences from custom approaches to software development , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[61]  François Chiocchio,et al.  Project Team Performance: A Study of Electronic Task and Coordination Communication , 2007 .

[62]  R. Nolan,et al.  How to Manage an IT Outsourcing Alliance , 1995 .

[63]  R. Müller,et al.  On the nature of the project as a temporary organization , 2003 .

[64]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[65]  R. Müller,et al.  The impact of principal–agent relationship and contract type on communication between project owner and manager , 2005 .

[66]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  A study of escalating commitment in principal–agent relationships: Effects of monitoring and personal responsibility. , 1998 .

[67]  Sarma R. Nidumolu A Comparison of the Structural Contingency and Risk-Based Perspectives on Coordination in Software Development Projects , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[68]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Net-Enabled Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[69]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  Clients, Contractors, and Consultants: The Consequences of Organizational Fragmentation in Contemporary Project Environments , 2001 .

[70]  Judy E. Scott,et al.  Managing risks in enterprise systems implementations , 2002, CACM.

[71]  Sandy D. Jap,et al.  Safeguarding Interorganizational Performance and Continuity Under Ex Post Opportunism , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[72]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Coordination in software development , 1995, CACM.

[73]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Trust in relationships: A model of development and decline. , 1995 .

[74]  Wenhong Luo,et al.  The Effect of Client - Consultant Coordination on is Project Performance: An Agency Theory Perspective , 2007, PICMET '07 - 2007 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology.

[75]  Rajesh Mirani,et al.  Procedural coordination and offshored software tasks: Lessons from two case studies , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[76]  P. Ring,et al.  Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships , 1994 .

[77]  Sarma R. Nidumolu The Effect of Coordination and Uncertainty on Software Project Performance: Residual Performance Risk as an Intervening Variable , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[78]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[79]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Uncertainty orientation and trust in close relationships: individual differences in cognitive styles , 1995 .