CONVERGENCE OF NEWTON'S METHOD FOR A MINIMIZATION PROBLEM IN IMPULSE NOISE REMOVAL ∗1)

Recently, two-phase schemes for removing salt-and-pepper and random-valued impulse noise are proposed in [6, 7]. The first phase uses decision-based median filters to locate those pixels which are likely to be corrupted by noise (noise candidates). In the second phase, these noise candidates are restored using a detail-preserving regularization method which allows edges and noise-free pixels to be preserved. As shown in [18], this phase is equivalent to solving a one-dimensional nonlinear equation for each noise candidate. One can solve these equations by using Newton’s method. However, because of the edgepreserving term, the domain of convergence of Newton’s method will be very narrow. In this paper, we determine the initial guesses for these equations such that Newton’s method will always converge.

[1]  John Law,et al.  Robust Statistics—The Approach Based on Influence Functions , 1986 .

[2]  Sung-Jea Ko,et al.  Center weighted median filters and their applications to image enhancement , 1991 .

[3]  J. Astola,et al.  Fundamentals of Nonlinear Digital Filtering , 1997 .

[4]  Stan Z. Li,et al.  On Discontinuity-Adaptive Smoothness Priors in Computer Vision , 1995, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Jyh-Charn Liu,et al.  Selective removal of impulse noise based on homogeneity level information , 2003, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[6]  Michael J. Black,et al.  On the unification of line processes, outlier rejection, and robust statistics with applications in early vision , 1996, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[7]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  A fast two-dimensional median filtering algorithm , 1979 .

[8]  Kenneth E. Barner,et al.  Rank conditioned rank selection filters for signal restoration , 1994, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[9]  Ken D. Sauer,et al.  A generalized Gaussian image model for edge-preserving MAP estimation , 1993, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[10]  Michael J. Black,et al.  On the unification of line processes , 1996 .

[11]  Gonzalo R. Arce,et al.  Detail-preserving ranked-order based filters for image processing , 1989, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[12]  H. Wu,et al.  Space variant median filters for the restoration of impulse noise corrupted images , 2001 .

[13]  Yrjö Neuvo,et al.  Detail-preserving median based filters in image processing , 1994, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[14]  Ja-Chen Lin,et al.  Minimum-maximum exclusive mean (MMEM) filter to remove impulse noise from highly corrupted images , 1997 .

[15]  Michel Barlaud,et al.  Deterministic edge-preserving regularization in computed imaging , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[16]  Yong Hoon Lee,et al.  Generalized median filtering and related nonlinear filtering techniques , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[17]  P. Green Bayesian reconstructions from emission tomography data using a modified EM algorithm. , 1990, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[18]  Chen Hu,et al.  An iterative procedure for removing random-valued impulse noise , 2004, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[19]  L. Rudin,et al.  Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms , 1992 .

[20]  Mila Nikolova,et al.  Regularizing Flows for Constrained Matrix-Valued Images , 2004, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[21]  Ioannis Pitas,et al.  Nonlinear mean filters in image processing , 1986, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[22]  Richard A. Haddad,et al.  Adaptive median filters: new algorithms and results , 1995, IEEE Trans. Image Process..