A wavelet-based approach to assessing timing errors in hydrologic predictions

Summary Streamflow predictions typically contain errors in both the timing and the magnitude of peak flows. These two types of error often originate from different sources (e.g. rainfall–runoff modeling vs. routing) and hence may have different implications and ramifications for both model diagnosis and decision support. Thus, where possible and relevant, they should be distinguished and separated in model evaluation and forecast verification applications. Distinct information on timing errors in hydrologic prediction could lead to more targeted model improvements in a diagnostic evaluation context, as well as better-informed decisions in many practical applications, such as flood prediction, water supply forecasting, river regulation, navigation, and engineering design. However, information on timing errors in hydrologic predictions is rarely evaluated or provided. In this paper, we discuss the importance of assessing and quantifying timing error in hydrologic predictions and present a new approach, which is based on the cross wavelet transform (XWT) technique. The XWT technique transforms the time series of predictions and corresponding observations into a two-dimensional time-scale space and provides information on scale- and time-dependent timing differences between the two time series. The results for synthetic timing errors (both constant and time-varying) indicate that the XWT-based approach can estimate timing errors in streamflow predictions with reasonable reliability. The approach is then employed to analyze the timing errors in real streamflow simulations for a number of headwater basins in the US state of Texas. The resulting timing error estimates were consistent with the physiographic and climatic characteristics of these basins. A simple post-factum timing adjustment based on these estimates led to considerably improved agreement between streamflow observations and simulations, further illustrating the potential for using the XWT-based approach for timing error estimation.

[1]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  Real-Time Variational Assimilation of Hydrologic and Hydrometeorological Data into Operational Hydrologic Forecasting , 2003 .

[2]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Application of temporal streamflow descriptors in hydrologic model parameter estimation , 2005 .

[3]  Yuqiong Liu,et al.  Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation , 2008 .

[4]  Douglas Maraun,et al.  Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics , 2000 .

[5]  Patrick Willems,et al.  A time series tool to support the multi-criteria performance evaluation of rainfall-runoff models , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[6]  E. Zehe,et al.  Hydrological model performance and parameter estimation in the wavelet-domain , 2009 .

[7]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  Do Nash values have value? , 2007 .

[8]  Josyane Ronchail,et al.  Recent advances in wavelet analyses: Part 2—Amazon, Parana, Orinoco and Congo discharges time scale variability , 2005 .

[9]  J. Ramsay,et al.  Curve registration , 2018, Oxford Handbooks Online.

[10]  Aslak Grinsted,et al.  Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics Application of the Cross Wavelet Transform and Wavelet Coherence to Geophysical Time Series , 2022 .

[11]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  A process‐based diagnostic approach to model evaluation: Application to the NWS distributed hydrologic model , 2008 .

[12]  Yi-Ru Chung,et al.  Derivation of variable IUH corresponding to time-varying rainfall intensity during storms / Dérivation d'un HUI variable correspondant à l'évolution temporelle de l'intensité pluviométrique durant les averses , 2008 .

[13]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  On the dialog between experimentalist and modeler in catchment hydrology: Use of soft data for multicriteria model calibration , 2002 .

[14]  K. Gerald van den Boogaart,et al.  Statistical Methods for the Qualitative Assessment of Dynamic Models with Time Delay (R Package qualV) , 2007 .

[15]  A. Heppenstall,et al.  Timing error correction procedure applied to neural network rainfall—runoff modelling , 2007 .

[16]  Tempei Hashino,et al.  Distributions-Oriented Verification of Ensemble Streamflow Predictions , 2004 .

[17]  H. Hersbach Decomposition of the Continuous Ranked Probability Score for Ensemble Prediction Systems , 2000 .

[18]  Paulin Coulibaly,et al.  Wavelet analysis of variability in annual Canadian streamflows , 2004 .

[19]  Jan Seibert,et al.  On the need for benchmarks in hydrological modelling , 2001 .

[20]  Yuqiong Liu,et al.  Uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Toward an integrated data assimilation framework , 2007 .

[21]  E. Foufoula‐Georgiou,et al.  Linkage of scaling and thermodynamic parameters of rainfall: Results from midlatitude mesoscale convective systems , 1996 .

[22]  Keith Beven,et al.  Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology , 2001 .

[23]  A. H. Murphy,et al.  Diagnostic verification of probability forecasts , 1992 .

[24]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling , 2009 .

[25]  Dong Jun Seo,et al.  Fast and efficient optimization of hydrologic model parameters using a priori estimates and stepwise line search , 2008 .

[26]  Richard A. Levine,et al.  Wavelets and Field Forecast Verification , 1997 .

[27]  Huan Meng,et al.  Development and testing of a terrain-based hydrologic model for spatial Hortonian Infiltration and Runoff/On , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[28]  L. Shawn Matott,et al.  Evaluating uncertainty in integrated environmental models: A review of concepts and tools , 2009 .

[29]  Ramesh S. V. Teegavarapu,et al.  Fuzzy set based error measure for hydrologic model evaluation , 2005 .

[30]  Joseph G. Teti,et al.  SAR ocean image representation using wavelets , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[31]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods , 2000 .

[32]  P. Reed,et al.  Characterization of watershed model behavior across a hydroclimatic gradient , 2008 .

[33]  P. Krause,et al.  COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT EFFICIENCY CRITERIA FOR HYDROLOGICAL MODEL ASSESSMENT , 2005 .

[34]  François Anctil,et al.  Non-stationary temporal characterization of the temperature profile of a soil exposed to frost in south-eastern Canada , 2008 .

[35]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information , 1998 .

[36]  Keith Beven,et al.  Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling , 1993 .

[37]  Neil McIntyre,et al.  Towards reduced uncertainty in conceptual rainfall‐runoff modelling: dynamic identifiability analysis , 2003 .

[38]  Stuart N. Lane,et al.  Assessment of rainfall‐runoff models based upon wavelet analysis , 2007 .

[39]  Bettina Schaefli,et al.  What drives high flow events in the Swiss Alps? Recent developments in wavelet spectral analysis and their application to hydrology , 2007 .

[40]  Dong Jun Seo,et al.  Automatic state updating for operational streamflow forecasting via variational data assimilation , 2009 .

[41]  Eric Gilleland,et al.  Intercomparison of Spatial Forecast Verification Methods , 2009 .

[42]  Erwin Zehe,et al.  Analysing the temporal dynamics of model performance for hydrological models , 2008 .

[43]  Yuqiong Liu,et al.  Linking science with environmental decision making: Experiences from an integrated modeling approach to supporting sustainable water resources management , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[44]  Yuqiong Liu,et al.  The Ensemble Verification System (EVS): A software tool for verifying ensemble forecasts of hydrometeorological and hydrologic variables at discrete locations , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[45]  Dennis McLaughlin,et al.  Data assimilation by field alignment , 2007 .

[46]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Using Image and Curve Registration for Measuring the Goodness of Fit of Spatial and Temporal Predictions , 2004, Biometrics.

[47]  Xu Liang,et al.  On the assessment of the impact of reducing parameters and identification of parameter uncertainties for a hydrologic model with applications to ungauged basins , 2006 .

[48]  Laurence C. Smith,et al.  Stream flow characterization and feature detection using a discrete wavelet transform , 1998 .

[49]  R. Stouffer,et al.  Stationarity Is Dead: Whither Water Management? , 2008, Science.

[50]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[51]  Guido Zolezzi,et al.  Assessing hydrological alterations at multiple temporal scales: Adige River, Italy , 2009 .

[52]  Michael Smith,et al.  Hydrology laboratory research modeling system (HL-RMS) of the US national weather service , 2004 .

[53]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  The role of hydrograph indices in parameter estimation of rainfall–runoff models , 2005 .

[54]  Chong-Yu Xu,et al.  Possible influence of ENSO on annual maximum streamflow of the Yangtze River, China , 2007 .

[55]  Robert J. Abrahart,et al.  HydroTest: A web-based toolbox of evaluation metrics for the standardised assessment of hydrological forecasts , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[56]  Victor Koren,et al.  Runoff response to spatial variability in precipitation: an analysis of observed data , 2004 .

[57]  Peter A. Troch,et al.  The future of hydrology: An evolving science for a changing world , 2010 .

[58]  C. Torrence,et al.  A Practical Guide to Wavelet Analysis. , 1998 .

[59]  S. Jevrejeva,et al.  Influence of the Arctic Oscillation and El Niño‐Southern Oscillation (ENSO) on ice conditions in the Baltic Sea: The wavelet approach , 2003 .

[60]  P. Webster,et al.  Interdecadal changes in the ENSO-monsoon system , 1999 .

[61]  E. Foufoula‐Georgiou,et al.  Wavelet analysis for geophysical applications , 1997 .

[62]  Julie Demargne,et al.  Application of Forecast Verification Science to Operational River Forecasting in the U.S. National Weather Service , 2009 .