Practising Language Interaction via Social Networking Sites: the "expert student's" perspective on personalized language learning

This chapter reports on the evaluation of language learning SNSs carried out by “expert students” who are training to become Teachers of English as a Foreign Language (TEFL) at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels. While stressing the positive features available on these sites and novel ways in which they can enable personalised language learning, this study also focuses on some troublesome aspects that occur when learners engage with Web 2.0 tools. It discusses how initial motivation towards these tools can turn into frustration, mirroring the results of a previous autoethnographic study carried out on SNSs. It also illustrates how these global ubiquitous platforms pose a dilemma for language practitioners who work within institutional teaching settings. Teachers recognize the language learning potential of these tools, but are also worried by the ethical threat they can pose, which can normally be avoided, or at least moderated, within institutional proprietary and “less exciting” platforms. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-2821-2.ch003

[1]  R. Lyster.  RECASTS, REPETITION, AND AMBIGUITY IN L2 CLASSROOM DISCOURSE , 1998, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[2]  David Little,et al.  Language Learner Autonomy: Some Fundamental Considerations Revisited , 2007 .

[3]  Rebecca W. Black,et al.  Second Language Use, Socialization, and Learning in Internet Interest Communities and Online Gaming , 2009 .

[4]  Douglas Jarrell,et al.  Willingness to communicate: can online chat help?1 , 2006 .

[5]  Susan M. Gass,et al.  Second Language Research: Methodology and Design , 2021 .

[6]  Michael Thomas,et al.  Identity in Online Communities: Social Networking Sites and Language Learning , 2009 .

[7]  Hussain Hafiz Sajjad,et al.  Task Based Language Learning and Teaching , 2015 .

[8]  J. Bruner.  Acts of meaning , 1990 .

[9]  Marina Orsini-Jones,et al.  Supporting a course in new literacies and skills for linguists with a Virtual Learning Environment. Results from a staff/student collaborative action-research project at Coventry University , 2004, ReCALL.

[10]  Congcong Wang,et al.  Pre-Service Teachers' Perceptions of Learning a Foreign Language Online: Preparing Teachers to Work with Linguistic, Cultural, and Technological Diversity , 2012, Int. J. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. Teach..

[11]  Marina Orsini-Jones,et al.  Shared Spaces and ‘Secret Gardens': The Troublesome Journey from Undergraduate Students to Undergraduate Scholars Via PebblePad , 2010 .

[12]  Glenn Stockwell,et al.  Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Introduction , 2012 .

[13]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[14]  Phil Benson,et al.  Teaching and Researching: Autonomy in Language Learning , 2001 .

[15]  Edith Ackermann,et al.  Perspective-Taking and Object Construction: Two Keys to Learning , 2012 .

[16]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  Learners experiences: how pervasive and integrative tools influence expectations of study , 2010 .

[17]  Phil Benson,et al.  Autonomy and information technology in the educational discourse of the information age , 2005 .

[18]  Joy Egbert,et al.  Moving Forward: Anecdotes and Evidence Guiding the Next Generation of CALL , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. Teach..

[19]  Sarah Guth.  Personal Learning Environments for Language Learning , 2009 .

[20]  Robert Godwin-Jones,et al.  Skype and Podcasting: Disruptive Technologies for Language Learning , 2005 .

[21]  John T. Guthrie,et al.  Contexts for Engagement and Motivation in Reading. , 2001 .

[22]  Paul Gruba,et al.  The use of social networking sites for foreign language learning: An autoethnographic study of Livemocha , 2010 .

[23]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Network-Based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice , 2000 .

[24]  Mike Levy,et al.  REVIEW OF CALL DIMENSIONS: OPTIONS AND ISSUES IN COMPUTER-ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING CALL Dimensions: Options and Issues in Computer-Assisted Language Learning , 2007 .

[25]  Billy Brick,et al.  Grammar learning through the social networking site for language learning www.busuu.com , 2014 .

[26]  Panagiota Alevizou,et al.  A literature review of the use of Web 2.0 tools in Higher Education , 2010 .

[27]  Jessica Williams.  The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form , 2001 .

[28]  Claudia Fernández,et al.  CALL Dimensions: Options and Issues in Computer-Assisted Language Learning by LEVY, MIKE, & GLENN STOCKWELL , 2007 .

[29]  Billy Brick,et al.  Social Networking Sites and Language Learning , 2011, Int. J. Virtual Pers. Learn. Environ..

[30]  M. Warschauer,et al.  Learning, Change, and Power: , 2008 .

[31]  Lesley Shield.  MOO as a language learning tool , 2003 .

[32]  Carol A. Chappelle.  Innovative language learning: achieving the vision , 2001, ReCALL.

[33]  David Little.  The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Content, purpose, origin, reception and impact , 2006, Language Teaching.

[34]  Elwyn Lloyd,et al.  Language Learners' "Willingness to Communicate" through Livemocha.com , 2012 .

[35]  David Crystal,et al.  Internet Linguistics: A Student Guide , 2011 .

[36]  Ann Barnes,et al.  Beyond the “wow” factor—Evaluating multimedia language learning software from a pedagogical viewpoint , 1998 .

[37]  Brian Tomlinson,et al.  Materials Development in Language Teaching , 2011 .

[38]  Bryan Smith.  Computer–Mediated Negotiated Interaction: An Expanded Model , 2003 .

[39]  Elena Polisca,et al.  Language learning and the raising of cultural awareness through Internet telephony: a case study , 2011 .

[40]  D. McDowell.  Foreword , 1999 .

[41]  Z. Dörnyei.  Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, de Z. Dörnyei , 2010 .

[42]  L. Vygotsky,et al.  Thought and Language , 1963 .

[43]  Cyrus C. M. Mody.  Nanotechnology and the Modern University , 2006 .

[44]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  AUDIENCE, AUTHORSHIP, AND ARTIFACT: THE EMERGENT SEMIOTICS OF WEB 2.0 , 2007, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.