The Grammaticalisation of Nominal Type Noun Constructions with kind/sort of: Chronology and Paths of Change

Denison distinguishes three main NP constructions with type nouns such as sort/kind/type of in Present-day English, namely the head, postdeterminer and qualifier constructions. The latter two developed from the binominal construction in which lexically full sort/kind/type is the head followed by a second noun designating a superordinate class. In the chronology he posits the postdeterminer construction as an early reanalysis of the binominal construction (c.1390 for all kind of and c.1550 for kind and sort of), whereas the qualifying constructions developed later from it (c.1580 for kind of and c.1710 for sort of), via the mediation of the postdeterminer construction. However, in recent synchronic corpus studies we have distinguished two additional NP constructions with type nouns, namely quantifier and descriptive modifier, on the basis of syntactic, semantic and collocational features. In the present article we consider the diachronic import of these newly distinguished constructions and argue that they are key pivots in the developmental paths that have led from the head construction to constructions in which the type noun is not the head. By thus refining Denison's proposed chronology, we argue that new constructions emerge as the result of complex interlocking paths in which the quantifier and descriptive modifier constructions pre-dated, and helped facilitate and entrench, the postdeterminer and qualifying constructions.

[1]  Bas Aarts,et al.  Syntactic gradience : the nature of grammatical indeterminacy , 2007 .

[2]  E. Traugott On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change , 1989 .

[3]  M. Haspelmath,et al.  Why is grammaticalization irreversible? , 1999 .

[4]  Lieselotte Brems Measure Noun constructions : an instance of semantically-driven grammaticalization , 2003 .

[5]  Carita Paradis,et al.  Reinforcing adjectives: A cognitive semantic perspective on grammaticalization , 2000 .

[6]  Merja Kytö,et al.  Manual to the diachronic part of the Helsinki Corpus of English texts : cording conventions and lists of source texts , 1993 .

[7]  Herman Wekker,et al.  Studies in English Language and Teaching , 1997 .

[8]  E. König,et al.  Pathways of lexicalization , 2001 .

[9]  Elizabeth Closs Traugott,et al.  Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Subjectification in grammaticalisation , 1995 .

[10]  Michael Halliday,et al.  An Introduction to Functional Grammar , 1985 .

[11]  Etsko Kruisinga A Handbook of present-day English , 1925 .

[12]  G. Lorenz Really worthwhile or not really significant ?: A corpus-based approach to the delexicalization and grammaticalization of intensifiers in Modern English , 2002 .

[13]  Karin Aijmer,et al.  English discourse particles , 2002 .

[14]  K. Davidse,et al.  Adjectives of Comparison: The Grammaticalization of their Attribute Uses into Postdeterminer and Classifier Uses , 2003 .

[15]  Hendrik De Smet,et al.  A corpus of late modern English texts , 2005 .

[16]  E. Finegan,et al.  English discourse particles : Evidence from a corpus , 2012 .

[17]  K. Davidse,et al.  Type noun uses in the English NP: A case of right to left layering , 2008 .

[18]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .