Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Mike Thelwall,et al. Search markets and search results: The case of Bing , 2013 .
[2] Emilio Delgado López-Cózar,et al. Google Scholar as a source for scholarly evaluation: A bibliographic review of database errors , 2017 .
[3] C. Lee Giles,et al. Accessibility of information on the Web , 2000, INTL.
[4] Mary Shultz,et al. Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar. , 2007, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.
[5] Steve Mirsky,et al. About the Size of It. , 2002 .
[6] John Mingers,et al. Normalizing Google Scholar data for use in research evaluation , 2017, Scientometrics.
[7] Enrique Orduña-Malea,et al. Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a multidisciplinary comparison , 2018, Scientometrics.
[8] Péter Jacsó,et al. Using Google Scholar for journal impact factors and the h‐index in nationwide publishing assessments in academia – siren songs and air‐raid sirens , 2012 .
[9] Peter Bailey,et al. Measuring Search Engine Quality , 2001, Information Retrieval.
[10] Concepción S. Wilson,et al. The Literature of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and Informetrics , 2001, Scientometrics.
[11] Rupesh K. Kesharwani,et al. Syngeneic Cardiac and Bone Marrow Stromal Cells Display Tissue-Specific microRNA Signatures and microRNA Subsets Restricted to Diverse Differentiation Processes , 2013, PloS one.
[12] Enrique Orduña-Malea,et al. Does Google Scholar contain all highly cited documents (1950-2013)? , 2014, ArXiv.
[13] Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al. Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: A comparison with Web of Science data , 2016 .
[14] Philipp Mayr,et al. An exploratory study of Google Scholar , 2007, Online Inf. Rev..
[15] Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent,et al. A systematic analysis of duplicate records in Scopus , 2015, J. Informetrics.
[16] M. HamidR.Jamali,et al. Google and the scholar: the role of Google in scientists' information-seeking behaviour , 2010, Online Inf. Rev..
[17] Andrew D. Asher,et al. College Libraries and Student Culture: What We Now Know , 2011 .
[18] Lutz Bornmann,et al. Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[19] Masood Fooladi,et al. A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases , 2013, ArXiv.
[20] Mike Thelwall,et al. Introduction to Webometrics: Quantitative Web Research for the Social Sciences , 2009, Introduction to Webometrics.
[21] Joost C. F. de Winter,et al. The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: a longitudinal study , 2013, Scientometrics.
[22] Henk F. Moed,et al. Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation - Review of the Literature , 2017, J. Informetrics.
[23] Cornelia Caragea,et al. CiteSeer x : A Scholarly Big Dataset , 2014, ECIR.
[24] Madian Khabsa,et al. Digital commons , 2020, Internet Policy Rev..
[25] Amanda Spink,et al. An Analysis of Web Documents Retrieved and Viewed , 2003, International Conference on Internet Computing.
[26] Jeanene Light,et al. Information-seeking behavior of basic science researchers: implications for library services. , 2010, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.
[27] Enrique Orduña-Malea,et al. Methods for estimating the size of Google Scholar , 2014, Scientometrics.
[28] Anne-Wil Harzing,et al. A longitudinal study of Google Scholar coverage between 2012 and 2013 , 2013, Scientometrics.
[29] Mansaf Alam,et al. A survey on scholarly data: From big data perspective , 2017, Inf. Process. Manag..
[30] Andrei Z. Broder,et al. A Technique for Measuring the Relative Size and Overlap of Public Web Search Engines , 1998, Comput. Networks.
[31] José Luis Ortega. Academic search engines : a quantitative outlook , 2014 .
[32] Judit Bar-Ilan,et al. Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century - A review , 2008, J. Informetrics.
[33] Enrique Orduña-Malea,et al. Google Scholar as a data source for research assessment , 2018, Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators.
[34] Bernard J. Jansen,et al. Coverage, relevance, and ranking: The impact of query operators on Web search engine results , 2003, TOIS.
[35] Enrique Orduña-Malea,et al. Empirical Evidences in Citation-Based Search Engines: Is Microsoft Academic Search dead? , 2014, Online Inf. Rev..
[36] Isidro F. Aguillo. Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis , 2012, Scientometrics.
[37] Mike Thelwall,et al. Bibliometrics to webometrics , 2008, J. Inf. Sci..
[38] Richard Van Noorden. Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network , 2014, Nature.
[39] Enrique Orduña-Malea,et al. Google Scholar Metrics evolution: an analysis according to languages , 2013, Scientometrics.
[40] Lokman I. Meho,et al. Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[41] Mark Levene,et al. Search Engines: Information Retrieval in Practice , 2011, Comput. J..
[42] Mike Thelwall,et al. Search engine coverage bias: evidence and possible causes , 2004, Inf. Process. Manag..
[43] David Bawden,et al. Is Google enough? Comparison of an internet search engine with academic library resources , 2005, Aslib Proc..
[44] Mike Thelwall,et al. Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories , 2018, J. Informetrics.
[45] Emilio Delgado López-Cózar,et al. Can we use Google Scholar to identify highly-cited documents? , 2017, J. Informetrics.
[46] Mike Thelwall,et al. Microsoft Academic Automatic Document Searches: Accuracy for Journal Articles and Suitability for Citation Analysis , 2017, J. Informetrics.
[47] Vincas Grigas,et al. 'Just Google it' - the scope of freely available information sources for doctoral thesis writing , 2017, Inf. Res..
[48] Péter Jacsó,et al. Google Scholar revisited , 2008, Online Inf. Rev..
[49] Helen Georgas,et al. Google vs. the Library (Part II): Student Search Patterns and Behaviors when Using Google and a Federated Search Tool , 2014 .
[50] C. Lee Giles,et al. CiteSeerX data: semanticizing scholarly papers , 2016, SBD '16.
[51] Martin P. Brändle,et al. The coverage of Microsoft Academic: analyzing the publication output of a university , 2017, Scientometrics.
[52] Rebecca Reznik-Zellen,et al. Trends in Large-Scale Subject Repositories , 2010, D Lib Mag..
[53] Satu Alakangas,et al. Microsoft Academic is one year old: the Phoenix is ready to leave the nest , 2017, Scientometrics.
[54] R Brian Haynes,et al. Retrieving Clinical Evidence: A Comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar for Quick Clinical Searches , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.
[55] Karen Hill,et al. International Directory of Company Histories , 2009 .