Posterior condylar offset and flexion in posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized TKA

BackgroundAnterior tibial translation associated with posterior impingement has been reported to be one of the factors limiting flexion after posterior cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA), especially when posterior condylar offset is decreased postoperatively. On the other hand, its effect on postoperative motion in posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA remains unknown. It has been demonstrated that PS TKA exhibits a consistent posterior femoral rollback during flexion. Thus, we hypothesized that the problem of posterior impingement can be avoided by use of PS TKA. In this study, we examined the relationship between postoperative posterior condylar offset and knee flexion in CR and PS TKAs.MethodsIn this study, analysis was performed for 20 subjects who underwent bilateral TKAs (one CR and one PS TKA) as well as another group of 50 PS TKAs. All patients could be tracked for a minimum of 2 years. The range of flexion was measured before operation and at follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative posterior condylar offset was evaluated on true lateral radiographs.ResultsAt the follow-up examination, the mean flexion angle was 123° in the CR knees and 131° in the PS knees with a significantly greater improvement observed for the latter group. In the roentgenographic measurement of the posterior condylar offset, no significant difference was observed between the preoperative and postoperative values both in the CR and PS knees. We divided the patients into two groups according to the change of posterior condylar offset. The first group (Group I) showed a decrease in the posterior condylar offset after surgery and the second group (Group II) showed no change or an increase. Subsequently, postoperative change in flexion was compared between Groups I and II for the CR and PS knees. A significant difference between Groups I and II was observed in the CR knees, while no difference was observed in the PS knees. The magnitude of postoperative posterior condylar offset did not correlate with an improvement in maximum flexion angle in the 50 PS knees.ConclusionsIt was shown that the magnitude of posterior condylar offset correlated with a postoperative change in flexion angle in CR knees, while no such correlation was observed in PS knees.

[1]  S. Banks,et al.  Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  F. Sim,et al.  Limited range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: etiology, treatment, and prognosis. , 1997, Orthopedics.

[3]  円山 茂樹 Functional comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty , 2005 .

[4]  Johan Bellemans,et al.  Knee Motions During Maximum Flexion in Fixed and Mobile-Bearing Arthroplasties , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  J. Elting,et al.  Range of Motion in Total Knee Replacement , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  S A Banks,et al.  In vivo kinematics of cruciate-retaining and -substituting knee arthroplasties. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  Timothy M Wright,et al.  Impingement of acetabular cups in a hip simulator: comparison of highly cross-linked and conventional polyethylene. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  D A Dennis,et al.  In Vivo Knee Kinematics Derived Using an Inverse Perspective Technique , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  Lotke Pa,et al.  The posterior cruciate ligament in total knee surgery. Save, sacrifice, or substitute? , 1994 .

[10]  P. Lotke*,et al.  The posterior cruciate ligament in total knee surgery. Save, sacrifice, or substitute? , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  Richard D Komistek,et al.  In vivo comparison of femorotibial contact positions for press-fit posterior stabilized and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  Shinichi Yoshiya,et al.  In vivo kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasties under passive and weight-bearing conditions. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[13]  W J Maloney,et al.  The effects of implant design on range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Total condylar versus posterior stabilized total condylar designs. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  J. Bellemans,et al.  Kinematics of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining and -substituting total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised outcome study. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[15]  J. Stiehl,et al.  Comparison of range of motion after posterior cruciate ligament retention or sacrifice with a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. , 1997, The American journal of knee surgery.

[16]  J. Stiehl,et al.  In vivo kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate ligament retention or sacrifice with a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. , 2000, The American journal of knee surgery.

[17]  T. O'Halloran,et al.  The effect of continuous passive motion duration and increment on range of motion in total knee arthroplasty patients. , 1997, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[18]  L. Dorr,et al.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  R. Pelker,et al.  Rollback in posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty. A radiographic analysis. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[20]  J B Stiehl,et al.  Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: the effect of implant design and weight-bearing conditions. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[21]  K. Yamamoto,et al.  Factors influencing the postoperative range of motion in total knee arthroplasty. , 1994, Bulletin (Hospital for Joint Diseases (New York, N.Y.)).

[22]  H. Shoji,et al.  Improved range of motion with the Y/S total knee arthroplasty system. , 1987, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.